The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The biology and ecology of narrow endemic and widespread plants: a comparative study of trait variation in 20 congeneric pairs
Abstract
The objective of this study is to examine whether habitat, herbivory and traits related to resource acquisition, resource conservation, reproduction and dispersal differ between narrow endemic plant species and their widespread congeners. We undertook pairwise contrasts of 25 ecological characteristics and biological traits in 20 congeneric pairs of narrow endemic and widespread plant species in the French Mediterranean region. Within each pair, the two species had the same life‐form, pollination mode and dispersal mode. Endemic species differed significantly from widespread congeners for a number of attributes. Endemic species occur in habitats on steeper slopes, with higher rock cover and in lower and more open vegetation than their widespread congeners. Endemic species are significantly smaller than widespread species, but show no differences in traits related to resource acquisition (specific leaf area, leaf nitrogen content, maximum photosynthetic rate) or resource conservation (leaf dry matter content). After accounting for their smaller stature, endemic species produce fewer and smaller flowers with less stigma‐anther separation and lower pollen/ovule ratios and produce fewer seeds per plant than their widespread congeners. No consistent variation in seed mass and propagule structure was found between congeneric species. Herbivory levels did not differ between congeneric species. Ecological characteristics, notably the occupation of rocky habitats with low aboveground competition, may thus have played an important role in the differentiation of narrow endemic species in the Western Mediterranean. Morphological and ecophysiological traits of narrow endemic species indicate that they are not more stress‐tolerant than their widespread congeners. Lower investment in pollen transfer and seed production suggest that local persistence is a key feature of the population ecology of narrow endemic species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002501 · Cited by 31,710
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The comparative method in evolutionary biology
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-5104 · Cited by 4,931
Lohrli, A. (1985) · Notes and Queries · doi:10.1093/notesj/32.3.377-a · Cited by 4,352
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology
Manly, B. F. J. (2018) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315273075 · Cited by 4,194
Plant Ecological Strategies: Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species
Westoby, M., Falster, D. S., Moles, A. T., Vesk, P. A., & Wright, I. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452 · Cited by 3,069
From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning
Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., & Ellsworth, D. S. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.25.13730 · Cited by 2,423
Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants
van der Pijl, L. (1982) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-87925-8 · Cited by 2,189
The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies
Ragin, C. C. (2014) · doi:10.1525/9780520957350 · Cited by 2,130
Cited by
Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology
Garland, T., Bennett, A. F., & Rezende, E. L. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01745 · Cited by 692
The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species
Westphal, M. I., Browne, M., MacKinnon, K., & Noble, I. (2008) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-007-9138-5 · Cited by 516
Gonzalez, A., Mouquet, N., & Loreau, M. (2009) · Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.003.0010 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Lavergne, S., Thompson, J. D., Garnier, E., & Debussche, M.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10-21
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 505-518
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2041375445
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The biology and ecology of narrow endemic and widespread plants: a comparative study of trait variation in 20 congeneric pairs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13423.x
- The paper
- Lavergne, S., Thompson, J. D., Garnier, E., & Debussche, M. (2004). The biology and ecology of narrow endemic and widespread plants: a comparative study of trait variation in 20 congeneric pairs. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13423.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.