The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Topological keystone species: measures of positional importance in food webs
Abstract
The local extinction or large fluctuation in abundance of a species may seriously affect other species in the community. The effects spread through the community by direct and indirect interactions. The network perspective on ecology can help map the pathways of these effects, for food webs, the pathways of indirect trophic interactions. Indirect interactions typically decay in intensity as they spread. Therefore, there is a conceptual maximum range in topological space beyond which interactions have no effects, even though all species remain connected. Neither the local characteristics of species, nor the global characteristics of entire webs, suitably quantify this range. We therefore apply intermediate scale indices that reflect the limitations imposed by effect damping in networks. We present a complex analysis of the topological positional importance of species in the Chesapeake Bay web. This web is a carbon‐flow network that represents trophic interactions. We present several different indices reflecting different properties and discuss which questions the different indices best answer. We look for the best indices for identifying the key players in ecosystem functioning. Our study contributes to the quantification of relative species importance and provides an exact and a priori determination of a class of candidate keystone species that can inform applied and conservation ecology as well as theoretical concerns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R., & Torres, F. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5352.860 · Cited by 4,743
A note on trophic complexity and community stability.
Paine, R. T. (1969) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282586 · Cited by 1,796
The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation.
Mills, L. S., & Doak, D. F. (1993) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1312122 · Cited by 1,306
Indirect Effects in Marine Rocky Intertidal Interaction Webs: Patterns and Importance
Menge, B. A. (1995) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937158 · Cited by 756
Metadata
- Authors
- Jordán, F., Liu, W., & Davis, A. J.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-23
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 535-546
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2126001334
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Topological keystone species: measures of positional importance in food webs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.13724.x
- The paper
- Jordán, F., Liu, W., & Davis, A. J. (2006). Topological keystone species: measures of positional importance in food webs. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.13724.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.