Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Growing large in a low grade environment: size dependent foraging gain and niche shifts to cannibalism in Arctic char

Finstad, Anders Gravbrøt, Ugedal, Ola, Berg, Ole Kristian·2006·Oikos

Abstract

Arctic char ( Salvelinus alpinus ) living in allopatry in lakes often show a distinct size dimorphism where the large char prey upon small char. We studied the relationship between size scaling of energy intake, total metabolic costs and levels of storage energy related to the niche shift from invertebrate feeding to cannibalism in an alpine Arctic char population. Gill‐net samples consisted of two distinct size modes, small invertebrate feeding char (92–172 mm total length) and large cannibalistic char (265–606 mm total length). Food consumption was estimated for a one year period using a radioactive tracer ( 137 Cs). The energy intake followed a hump‐shaped relationship with fish size for invertebrate feeding char and increased monotonically with size for cannibalistic char. Total metabolic costs increased exponentially with size for both groups. Char feeding in the invertebrate niche had a maximum net energy gain at 140 mm total length with an upper size limit for positive net energy gain at 180 mm. For cannibals the relationship between size and net energy gain formed a hump shaped function with maximum net energy gain at 400 mm and a lower size limit for positive net energy gain at 230 mm. The size at maturation for both small and large char was close to the size for maximum energy gain in their respective niches. Immature individuals close to the upper size limit for positive net energy gain in the invertebrate niche had low levels of storage lipids but tended to have high mass specific growth rates. This may imply a reallocation from reversible (stored) energy to structural (length) growth as a strategy to transform into the size‐range where the cannibalistic niche successfully could be exploited.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2006.13990.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Finstad, A. G., Ugedal, O., & Berg, O. K.
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
73-82
ISSN
  • 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0706
OpenAlex
W2170748768
Cited by
318
References
2
FWCI
9.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.