The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Growing large in a low grade environment: size dependent foraging gain and niche shifts to cannibalism in Arctic char
Abstract
Arctic char ( Salvelinus alpinus ) living in allopatry in lakes often show a distinct size dimorphism where the large char prey upon small char. We studied the relationship between size scaling of energy intake, total metabolic costs and levels of storage energy related to the niche shift from invertebrate feeding to cannibalism in an alpine Arctic char population. Gill‐net samples consisted of two distinct size modes, small invertebrate feeding char (92–172 mm total length) and large cannibalistic char (265–606 mm total length). Food consumption was estimated for a one year period using a radioactive tracer ( 137 Cs). The energy intake followed a hump‐shaped relationship with fish size for invertebrate feeding char and increased monotonically with size for cannibalistic char. Total metabolic costs increased exponentially with size for both groups. Char feeding in the invertebrate niche had a maximum net energy gain at 140 mm total length with an upper size limit for positive net energy gain at 180 mm. For cannibals the relationship between size and net energy gain formed a hump shaped function with maximum net energy gain at 400 mm and a lower size limit for positive net energy gain at 230 mm. The size at maturation for both small and large char was close to the size for maximum energy gain in their respective niches. Immature individuals close to the upper size limit for positive net energy gain in the invertebrate niche had low levels of storage lipids but tended to have high mass specific growth rates. This may imply a reallocation from reversible (stored) energy to structural (length) growth as a strategy to transform into the size‐range where the cannibalistic niche successfully could be exploited.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Peres, C. A., & Palacios, E. (2007) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00272.x · Cited by 1,383
Size, Scaling, and the Evolution of Complex Life Cycles
Werner, E. E. (1988) · Size-Structured Populations · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-74001-5_6 · Cited by 317
Cited by
Review: Ecological networks – beyond food webs
Ings, T. C., Montoya, J. M., Bascompte, J., Blüthgen, N., Brown, L., Dormann, C. F., Edwards, F., Figueroa, D., Jacob, U., Jones, J. I., et al. (2009) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01460.x · Cited by 934
The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs.
McCann, K. S., Rasmussen, J. B., & Umbanhowar, J. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00742.x · Cited by 648
Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants
Vázquez, D. P., Morris, W. F., & Jordano, P. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00810.x · Cited by 599
Food‐web dynamics in a large river discontinuum
Cross, W. F., Baxter, C. V., Rosi-Marshall, E. J., Hall, R. O., Kennedy, T. A., Donner, K. C., Wellard Kelly, H. A., Seegert, S. E. Z., Behn, K. E., & Yard, M. D. (2013) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/12-1727.1 · Cited by 191
Predator decline leads to decreased stability in a coastal fish community
Britten, G. L., Dowd, M., Minto, C., Ferretti, F., Boero, F., & Lotze, H. K. (2014) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12354 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Finstad, A. G., Ugedal, O., & Berg, O. K.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-82
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2170748768
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.