The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Authority and Expertise: The Professionalisation of International Development and the Ordering of Dissent
Abstract
I explore how the increasing professionalisation of international development has enabled the expansion of the neoliberal agenda of development agencies and, at the same time, the co-optation of so-called “alternative” approaches onto this agenda. The focus is on the key figure of the development “expert” as an agent involved in consolidating unilinear notions of modernising progress. First, there is an examination of the post-war production of the development expert and the reproduction of systems of expertise and forms of authority that they articulate. Research with former UK colonial officers who worked in the post-independence development industry is subsequently drawn upon to exemplify the continuities and divergences from colonial rule to contemporary discourses of development. Then, there is a demonstration of the co-optation of potentially critical discourses, focusing upon the creation of professionals and the exclusive forms of knowledge that surround the practice of participatory development. Finally, in the conclusion, I argue that increasing professionalisation within the development industry supports the neoliberal development agenda and that there remains a need to identify how critical discourses can be effective within it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harvey, D. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199264315.001.0001 · Cited by 7,037
Jehlen, M., & Said, E. W. (1994) · The William and Mary Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2946944 · Cited by 6,527
Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World.
Greenhalgh, S., & Escobar, A. (1995) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2137509 · Cited by 5,455
Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses
Mohanty, C. (1988) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.1988.42 · Cited by 4,855
(2001) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 4,566
Chambers, R. (1997) · Practical Action Publishing eBooks · doi:10.3362/9781780440453 · Cited by 1,568
Sibley, D. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203430545 · Cited by 1,286
(1992) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.9302 · Cited by 1,213
The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith
Valk, P. D., & Rist, G. (1998) · The International Journal of African Historical Studies · doi:10.2307/220904 · Cited by 1,167
Rahnema, M., & Bawtree, V. (1997) · Cited by 1,130
Cited by
Travelling technocrats, embodied knowledges: Globalising privatisation in telecoms and water
Larner, W., & Laurie, N. (2010) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.11.005 · Cited by 278
Spatialising Participatory Approaches: The Contribution of Geography to a Mature Debate
Kesby, M. (2007) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a38326 · Cited by 182
Arnall, A. (2014) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.1111/geoj.12036 · Cited by 101
Sandwick, T., Fine, M., Greene, A. C., Stoudt, B. G., Torre, M. E., & Patel, L. (2018) · Urban Education · doi:10.1177/0042085918763513 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Kothari, U.
- Venue
- Antipode
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 425-446
- ISSN
- 0066-4812 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8330
- OpenAlex
- W2107574162
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 37.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Authority and Expertise: The Professionalisation of International Development and the Ordering of Dissent. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00505.x
- The paper
- Kothari, U. (2005). Authority and Expertise: The Professionalisation of International Development and the Ordering of Dissent. Antipode. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00505.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.