Cited by 33Contact Dermatitis and AllergiesDermatology and Skin DiseasesMedication Adherence and Compliance

Compliance in contact allergy with focus on cosmetic labelling: a qualitative research project

Noiesen, Eline, Larsen, Kristian, Agner, Tove·2004·Contact Dermatitis

Abstract

Elimination of the allergen is an effective remedy in allergic contact dermatitis. When contact allergy to a preservative is diagnosed, the patient is instructed to read the labelling of contents and to avoid the use of products containing the allergens. The present study, using qualitative research methods, was performed to examine how socially different groups of patients handle everyday life with allergic contact dermatitis caused by preservatives in consumer products. 8 women were interviewed about reading the ingredient labelling on cosmetic products. Observational studies were carried out as well. The study illustrates that the patients experienced problems when trying to read the labelling of contents. The problems were related to social status and ranged from not being able to read the chemical names of the preservatives to doubting the accuracy of the ingredient labelling. The study indicates that non‐compliance with instructions on reading the ingredient labelling is not only a question of patients' lack of knowledge, but also the result of patients not possessing the resources necessary to act in accordance with the medical instructions. The present study is, to our knowledge, the first to apply qualitative research methods to contact dermatitis. The study points out interesting observations about social status and resources in relation to compliance. Further research on this area is necessary to expose the extent of the problem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00442.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another Danish study reported that non-compliance with instructions on reading ingredient labelling is not only a question of patients' lack of knowledge but also the result of persons not possessing the resources necessary to act in accordance with medical instructions.

    “Another Danish study reported that non-compliance with instructions on reading the ingredient labelling is not only a question of patients' lack of knowledge but also the result of persons not possessing the resources necessary to act in accordance with the medical instructions6”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noiesen, E., Larsen, K., & Agner, T.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Noiesen, Eline
Venue
Contact Dermatitis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
189-195
ISSN
  • 0105-1873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0536
OpenAlex
W2088006870
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contact Dermatitis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
allergic contact dermatitis, preservative allergy, medication adherence, patient experience, social status, health literacy, allergen avoidance, consumer goods
MeSH terms
Adult, Cosmetics, Drug Labeling, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Social Class, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review