Cited by 92Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesMale Reproductive Health Studies

Prediction of pregnancy by intrauterine insemination using CASA estimates and strict criteria in patients with male factor infertility

Open access
Shibahara, Hiroaki, Obara, Hiromi, Ayustawati, Hirano, Yuki, Suzuki, Tatsuya, Ohno, Akiko, Takamizawa, Satoru, Suzuki, Mitsuaki·2004·International Journal of Andrology

Abstract

Summary: This study was performed to predict pregnancy by intrauterine insemination (IUI) using computer‐aided sperm analysis (CASA) estimates and strict criteria in patients with male factor infertility. IUI was performed in 682 cycles on 160 male factor infertile patients. Semen examinations were carried out by CASA and strict criteria before and after sperm preparation using continuous‐step density gradient centrifugation. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed for assessment of the effectiveness of each individual parameter in predicting pregnancy by IUI. A clinically acceptable threshold was calculated when sensitivity plus specificity were maximum. The average cycle of IUI performed was 4.3 ± 2.4. Pregnancy rate per cycle and per patient were 7.2% (49/682) and 28.1% (45/160), respectively. Using ROC curve, it was shown that normal sperm morphology assessed by the strict criteria before sperm separation and five parameters after sperm separation including rapid, progressive motility, average path velocity (VAP), curvilinear velocity (VCL), and straight line velocity (VSL) were able to predict pregnancy by IUI. Correlation between sperm parameters and pregnancy outcome was examined by the logistic regression model. In a multivariate analysis normal morphology before sperm separation ≥15.5% [odds ratio (OR) = 2.2, p = 0.02], rapid after sperm separation ≥25.5% [OR = 3.9, p = 0.029], and VCL after sperm separation ≥102.65 μm/sec [OR = 3.2, p = 0.002] were the parameters of predictive value for pregnancy outcome. Adjustment of the model for female age, female infertility factors, and the methods of ovulation induction did not change this finding, and the final model still had the same covariates. Pregnancy rates per cycle according to the number (0, 1, 2 and 3) of variables satisfied with the three parameters were 0% (0/110), 1.6% (3/183), 9.7% (21/217) and 15.1% (23/151), respectively. Three semen parameters including normal morphology before sperm separation, rapid and VCL after sperm separation were identified as predictors of pregnancy by IUI. These variables would be helpful when counselling patients before they make the decision to proceed with in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)‐ET.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0105-6263.2004.00437.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other smaller studies observed that sperm morphology affected the outcome of IUI.

    “Other studies of smaller series also observed that sperm morphology affected the outcome of IUI [86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93].”

    From Recommendations for Human Sperm Morphology Assessment in 2025: An Expert Review From the French BLEFCO Group (2026) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Results of IUI treatment report that normal sperm morphology predicted pregnancy after IUI, supporting the main point. The Discussion describes this study as a “large series of 682 consecutive IUI”; our copy does not establish that it was a smaller series relative to the citing study. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Aitken, R. J., Sutton, M., Warner, P. & Richardson, D. W. (1985) Relationship between the movement characteristics of human spermatozoa and their ability to penetrate cervical mucus and zona-free hamster oocytes. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 73, 441-449.
  2. Allen, N. C., Herbert III, C. M., Maxson, W. S., Rogers, B. J., Diamond, M. P. & Wentz, A. C. (1985) Intrauterine in- semination: a critical review. Fertility and Sterility 44, 569-580.
  3. Hirano, Y., Shibahara, H., Obara, H., Suzuki, T., Takamizawa, S., Yamaguchi, C., Tsunoda, H. & Sato, I. (2001) Relationships between sperm motility characteristics assessed by the computer-aided sperm analysis (CASA) and fertilization rates in vitro. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 18, 213-218.
  4. Hosmer, D.W. Jr & Lemeshaw, S. (1989) Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Jeulin, C., Feneux, D., Serres, C., Jouannet, P., Guillet-Rosso, F., Belaisch-Allart, J., Frydman, R. & Testart, J. (1986) Sperm factors related to failure of human in-vitro fertilization. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 76, 735-744.
  6. Katz, D. F., Overstreet, J. W., Samuels, S. J., Niswander, P. W., Bloom, T. D. & Lewis, E. L. (1986) Morphometric analysis of spermatozoa in the assessment of human male fertility. Journal of Andrology 7, 203-210.
  7. Lindheim, S. R., Barad, D. H., Zinger, M., Witt, B., Amin, H., Cohen, B., Fisch, H. & Barg, P. (1996) Abnormal sperm morphology in highly predictive of pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemina- tion. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 13, 569-572.
  8. Obara, H., Shibahara, H., Tsunoda, H., Taneichi, A., Fujiwara, H., Takamizawa, S., Idei, S. & Sato, I. (2001) Prediction of un- expectedly poor fertilization and pregnancy outcome using the strict criteria for sperm morphology before and after sperm se- paration in IVF-ET. International Journal of Andrology 24, 102- 108.
  9. Ombelet, W., Cox, A. & Jansen, M. (1996) Artificial insemination 2: using the husband's sperm. In: Human Spermatozoa in Assisted Reproduction, 2nd edn (eds A. A. Acosta & T. F. Kruger), pp. 399-412. Parthenon Publishing Group, New York.
  10. Shibahara, H., Naito, S., Hasegawa, A. Mitsuo, M., Shigeta, M. & Koyama, K. (1997) Evaluation of sperm fertilizing ability using the Sperm Quality Analyzer. International Journal of Andrology 20, 112-117.
  11. Shibahara, H., Hamada, Y., Hasegawa, A., Wakimoto, E., Toji, H., Shigeta, M. & Koyama, K. (1999) Relationship between the sperm motility index assessed by the Sperm Quality Analyzer and the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 16, 540-545.
  12. Shibahara, H., Yamanaka, H., Hirano, Y., Kikuchi, K., Yamanaka, S., Suzuki, T., Takamizawa, S. & Suzuki, M. (2003) Analysis of factors associated with multinucleate formation in human IVF. International Journal of Andrology 26, 211-214.
  13. Shulman, A., Hauser, R., Lipitz, S., Frenkel, Y., Dor, J., Bider, D., Mashiach, S., Yogev, L. & Yavetz, H. (1998) Sperm motility is a major determinant of pregnancy outcome following intrauterine insemination. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 6, 381- 385.
  14. Suzuki, T., Shibahara, H., Tsunoda, H., Hirano, Y., Taneichi, A., Obara, H., Takamizawa, S. & Sato, I. (2002) Comparison of the Sperm Quality Analyzer IIC variables with the computer-aided sperm analysis estimates. International Journal of Andrology 25, 49- 54.
  15. Van Waart, J., Kruger, T. F., Lombard, C. J. & Ombelet, W. (2001) Predictive value of normal sperm morphology in in- trauterine insemination (IUI): a structured literature review. Human Reproduction Update 7, 495-500.
  16. World Health Organization (1999) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interac- tion, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shibahara, H., Obara, H., Ayustawati, Hirano, Y., Suzuki, T., Ohno, A., Takamizawa, S., & Suzuki, M.
Affiliations
Jichi Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Shibahara, Hiroaki
Venue
International Journal of Andrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03-05
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
63-68
ISSN
  • 0105-6263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2605
OpenAlex
W2017922757
Cited by
92
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Andrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
intrauterine insemination, male factor infertility, computer-assisted sperm analysis, sperm motility, sperm morphology, sperm preparation, density gradient centrifugation, pregnancy prediction, curvilinear velocity, ovulation induction, patient counseling, logistic regression
MeSH terms
Adult, Electronic Data Processing, Female, Humans, Infertility, Male, Insemination, Artificial, Homologous, Male, Pregnancy, Prognosis, ROC Curve, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Pregnancy Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review