The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The concept of resilience revisited
Abstract
The intimate connections between disaster recovery by and the resilience of affected communities have become common features of disaster risk reduction programmes since the adoption of The Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015. Increasing attention is now paid to the capacity of disaster-affected communities to 'bounce back' or to recover with little or no external assistance following a disaster. This highlights the need for a change in the disaster risk reduction work culture, with stronger emphasis being put on resilience rather than just need or vulnerability. However, varied conceptualisations of resilience pose new philosophical challenges. Yet achieving a consensus on the concept remains a test for disaster research and scholarship. This paper reviews the concept in terms of definitional issues, the role of vulnerability in resilience discourse and its meaning, and the differences between vulnerability and resilience. It concludes with some of the more immediately apparent implications of resilience thinking for the way we view and prepare for disasters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kendra, J. M., & Wachtendorf, T. (2003) · Disasters · doi:10.1111/1467-7717.00218 · Cited by 574
Cited by
Managing the health effects of climate change
Costello, A., Abbas, M., Allen, A., Ball, S., Bell, S., Bellamy, R., Friel, S., Groce, N., Johnson, A., Kett, M., et al. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60935-1 · Cited by 3,102
Social Capital and Community Resilience
Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764214550299 · Cited by 2,331
Organizational Response to Adversity: Fusing Crisis Management and Resilience Research Streams
Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0134 · Cited by 1,945
Linnenluecke, M. K. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12076 · Cited by 1,682
Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering
Woods, D. D. (2015) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018 · Cited by 880
Metadata
- Authors
- Manyena, S. B.
- Venue
- Disasters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-11-13
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 434-450
- ISSN
- 0361-3666 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099739542
- Cited by
- 1,731
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 43.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The concept of resilience revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2006.00331.x
- The paper
- Manyena, S. B. (2006). The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2006.00331.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
