The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect
Abstract
This paper attempts to take the politics of affect as not just incidental but central to the life of cities, given that cities are thought of as inhuman or transhuman entities and that politics is understood as a process of community without unity. It is in three main parts. The first part sets out the main approaches to affect that conform with this approach. The second part considers the ways in which the systematic engineering of affect has become central to the political life of Euro‐American cities, and why. The third part then sets out the different kinds of progressive politics that might become possible once affect is taken into account. There are some brief conclusions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The expression of the emotions in man and animals.
Darwin, C. (1872) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.1037/10001-000 · Cited by 11,657
Handbook of Affective Sciences
(2002) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195126013.001.0001 · Cited by 5,073
Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation
Massumi, B. (2002) · doi:10.1215/9780822383574 · Cited by 4,627
Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840715 · Cited by 4,347
Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1946 · Cited by 3,771
Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-4883 · Cited by 3,163
Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity
Sedgwick, E. K. (2003) · doi:10.1215/9780822384786 · Cited by 2,464
Performance Studies: An Introduction
Kolin, P. C., & Schechner, R. (2003) · World Literature Today · doi:10.2307/40158341 · Cited by 2,271
Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain
Gross, H. S. (2004) · Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000130139.70393.da · Cited by 2,051
Looking for Spinoza : Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain
Damásio, A. R. (2003) · Dominican Scholar (Dominican University of California) · Cited by 1,879
Cited by
Affective spaces, melancholic objects: ruination and the production of anthropological knowledge*
Navaro‐Yashin, Y. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.01527.x · Cited by 494
Tolia‐Kelly, D. P. (2006) · Area · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00682.x · Cited by 448
Globalized fear? Towards an emotional geopolitics
Pain, R. (2009) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132508104994 · Cited by 438
The matter of ‘virtual’ geographies
Kinsley, S. (2014) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132513506270 · Cited by 313
‘Sending Dollars Shows Feeling’ – Emotions and Economies in Filipino Migration
Mckay, D. (2007) · Mobilities · doi:10.1080/17450100701381532 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Thrift, N.
- Venue
- Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-78
- ISSN
- 0435-3684 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-0467
- OpenAlex
- W1999042206
- Cited by
- 1,919
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 178.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x
- The paper
- Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.