The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chewing behavior and salivary secretion
Abstract
We determined the salivary flow rate in 16 healthy subjects in rest and while chewing artificial and natural foods (Parafilm, Melba toast with and without margarine, and three different volumes of breakfast cake and cheese). We also determined the duration of a chewing cycle, the number of chewing cycles until swallowing, and the time until swallowing. The physical characteristics of the foods were quantified from force‐deformation experiments. The flow rates of the saliva as obtained without stimulation, with Parafilm stimulation, and with chewing on the various foods were significantly correlated. An increase in chewing cycle duration, number of chewing cycles until swallowing, and time until swallowing was observed as a function of the volume of the food. More chewing cycles were required for Melba toast than for an equal volume of cake or cheese. This may be caused by the low water and fat percentage of the Melba toast. The number of chewing cycles and the time until swallowing significantly decreased when the Melba toast was buttered. The decrease may be caused by facilitation in bolus formation and lubrication of the food due to buttering the toast. The number of chewing cycles until swallowing was not correlated to the salivary flow rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A standardised static in vitro digestion method suitable for food – an international consensus
Minekus, M., Alminger, M., Alvito, P., Ballance, S., Bohn, T., Bourlieu, C., Carrière, F., Boutrou, R., Corredig, M., Dupont, D., et al. (2014) · Food Funct. · doi:10.1039/c3fo60702j · Cited by 5,824
A Human Gastric Simulator (HGS) to Study Food Digestion in Human Stomach
Kong, F., & Singh, R. P. (2010) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01856.x · Cited by 428
Bolus formation and disintegration during digestion of food carbohydrates
Bornhorst, G. M., & Singh, R. P. (2012) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2011.00172.x · Cited by 160
Influence of oral processing on appetite and food intake—A systematic review and meta-analysis
Krop, E. M., Hetherington, M. M., Nekitsing, C., Miquel, S., Postelnicu, L., & Sarkar, A. (2018) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.018 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Gavião, M. B. D., Engelen, L., & Van Der Bilt, A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Oral Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-24
- ISSN
- 0029-845X (ISSN-L)
- 0909-8836
- 1600-0722
- OpenAlex
- W2007827344
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chewing behavior and salivary secretion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0909-8836.2004.00105.x
- The paper
- Gavião, M. B. D., Engelen, L., & Van Der Bilt, A. (2004). Chewing behavior and salivary secretion. European Journal of Oral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0909-8836.2004.00105.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.