The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rejection Sensitivity and the Defensive Motivational System: Insights From the Startle Response to Rejection Cues
Abstract
Rejection sensitivity (RS) is the disposition to anxiously expect, readily perceive, and intensely react to rejection. This study used the startle probe paradigm to test whether the affect-based defensive motivational system is automatically activated by rejection cues in people who are high in RS. Stimuli were representational paintings depicting rejection (by Hopper) and acceptance (by Renoir), as well as nonrepresentational paintings of either negative or positive valence (by Rothko and Miro, respectively). Eyeblink startle magnitude was potentiated in people high in RS when they viewed rejection themes, compared with when they viewed nonrepresentational negative themes. Startle magnitude was not attenuated during viewing of acceptance themes in comparison with nonrepresentational positive themes. Overall, the results provide evidence that for people high in RS, rejection cues automatically activate the defensive motivational system, but acceptance cues do not automatically activate the appetitive motivational system.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Rejection sensitivity can also be explained as a state of a defensive motivational system (Downey, Mougios, Ayduk, London, & Shoda, 2004;Romero-Canyas et al., 2010).”
From Associations between rejection sensitivity and mental health outcomes: A meta-analytic review (2017) · cites this paper as Downey et al., 2004
In the citing paper
“Compared to individuals with low rejection sensitivity, individuals with high rejection sensitivity show heightened physiological activity (Downey et al., 2004)”
From Associations between rejection sensitivity and mental health outcomes: A meta-analytic review (2017) · cites this paper as Downey et al., 2004
In the citing paper
“When rejection is the threat, activation of the rejection sensitivity system prepares individuals to detect signs of social threat, and to be ready for immediate action in order to avert the danger by being self-defensive (Downey et al., 2004).”
From Associations between rejection sensitivity and mental health outcomes: A meta-analytic review (2017) · cites this paper as Downey et al., 2004
Citations
Cites
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
Littell, R. C. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,345
Social Foundations of Thought and Action
Bandura, A. (2002) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446221129.n6 · Cited by 9,948
(1996) · Cited by 3,692
Stress and emotion: a new synthesis
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-1229 · Cited by 3,655
The psychology of fear and stress
(1988) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-2399 · Cited by 3,133
A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.1.3 · Cited by 2,931
Stress and emotion, a new synthesis
Lazanis, R. S. (1999) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2850.1999.00227-9.x · Cited by 2,831
Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.377 · Cited by 2,205
Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships
Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327 · Cited by 2,110 · cited 4×
“We have applied the term high-rejection-sensitive (HRS) to describe people who show a heightened tendency to anxiously expect, readily perceive, and intensely react to rejection ( Downey & Feldman, 1996 ).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFear and anxiety: Animal models and human cognitive psychophysiology
Lang, P. J., Davis, M., & Öhman, A. (2000) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(00)00343-8 · Cited by 1,162
Emotion, motivation, and anxiety: brain mechanisms and psychophysiology
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1998) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00275-3 · Cited by 1,043
Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear
Fanselow, M. S. (1994) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210947 · Cited by 1,000
Downey, G., Freitas, A. L., Michaelis, B., & Khouri, H. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.545 · Cited by 719
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-4881 · Cited by 683
(1987) · Cited by 514
Startle Reflex Modification: Emotion or Attention?
Bradley, M. M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (1990) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb01966.x · Cited by 403
Startle Modification: Implications for Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, and Clinical Science
Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Böhmelt, A. H. (2008) · Cited by 344
Hamm, A. O., Cuthbert, B. N., Globisch, J., & Vaitl, D. (1997) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02420.x · Cited by 308
Bradley, M. M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665523.010 · Cited by 248
Funayama, E. S., Grillon, C., Davis, M., & Phelps, E. A. (2001) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290152541395 · Cited by 225
SCL-90-R : administration, scoring and procedures
Lr, D. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 220
Anthony, B. J., & Graham, F. K. (1985) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(85)90052-3 · Cited by 157
Levy, S. R., Ayduk, Ö. N., & Downey, G. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195130157.003.0010 · Cited by 114
Putnam, L. E., & Roth, W. T. (1990) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb00383.x · Cited by 90
(1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665523 · Cited by 60
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Williams, K. D. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641 · Cited by 1,828
“…universal needs for acceptance and belonging, important individual differences exist in how peoplerespondtoimaginedoractualrejection Theseresearchersproposedade-fensive motivational system that influences and guides perceived appropriate responding in the face of rejection (Downey et al. 2004).”
Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., Bélanger, J. J., Sheveland, A., Hettiarachchi, M., & Gunaratna, R. K. (2014) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12163 · Cited by 985
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.035 · Cited by 715
“It draws on the concept of “rejection sensitivity” (Downey et al., 2004), which emphasizes how concerned someone would be to engage in an interaction that carries the potential for rejection.”
BackgroundEvaluating Six Common Stereotypes About Older Workers with Meta‐Analytical Data
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2012) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12003 · Cited by 689
Levin, R., & Nielsen, T. A. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.482 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Downey, G., Mougios, V., Ayduk, O., London, B. E., & Shoda, Y.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Long Island University (US)
- University of California, Berkeley;
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 668-673
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2135060565
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 8.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r29mh051113-01)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 51113, MH39349)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- rejection sensitivity, startle response, automatic activation, affective motivation, fear of rejection
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cues, Defense Mechanisms, Humans, Motivation, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rejection, Psychology, Reflex, Startle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
