The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative and reproducible murine model of excisional wound healing
Abstract
The goal of animal wound healing models is to replicate human physiology and predict therapeutic outcomes. There is currently no model of wound healing in rodents that closely parallels human wound healing. Rodents are attractive candidates for wound healing studies because of their availability, low cost, and ease of handling. However, rodent models have been criticized because the major mechanism of wound closure is contraction, whereas in humans reepithelialization and granulation tissue formation are the major mechanisms involved. This article describes a novel model of wound healing in mice utilizing wound splinting that is accurate, reproducible, minimizes wound contraction, and allows wound healing to occur through the processes of granulation and reepithelialization. Our results show that splinted wounds have an increased amount of granulation tissue deposition as compared to controls, but the rate of reepithelialization is not affected. Thus, this model eliminates wound contraction and allows rodents' wounds to heal by epithelialization and granulation tissue formation. Given these analogies to human wound healing, we believe that this technique is a useful model for the study of wound healing mechanisms and for the evaluation of new therapeutic modalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Therapeutic effects of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in diabetic mice.
Coleman, D. L., Leiter, E. H., & Schwizer, R. W. (1982) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.31.9.830 · Cited by 317
Cited by
Chen, L., Tredget, E. E., Wu, P. Y. G., & Wu, Y. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001886 · Cited by 1,610
Calreticulin: non‐endoplasmic reticulum functions in physiology and disease
Gold, L. I., Eggleton, P., Sweetwyne, M. T., Van Duyn, L. B., Greives, M. R., Naylor, S., Michalak, M., & Murphy‐Ullrich, J. E. (2010) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.09-145482 · Cited by 382
Schierle, C. F., De la Garza, M., Mustoe, T. A., & Galiano, R. D. (2009) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2009.00489.x · Cited by 311
Self-citationSantos, J. M., Camões, S. P., Filipe, E., Cipriano, M., Barcia, R. N., Filipe, M., Teixeira, M., Simões, S., Gaspar, M., Mosqueira, D., et al. (2015) · Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13287-015-0082-5 · Cited by 196
The Tumor Microenvironment in Tumorigenesis and Therapy Resistance Revisited
Dzobo, K., Senthebane, D. A., & Dandara, C. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15020376 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Galiano, R. D., Michaels, V, Dobryansky, M., Levine, J. P., & Gurtner, G. C.
- Venue
- Wound Repair and Regeneration
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-19
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 485-492
- ISSN
- 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-475X
- OpenAlex
- W2029497643
- Cited by
- 738
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative and reproducible murine model of excisional wound healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.12404.x
- The paper
- Galiano, R. D., Michaels, V, Dobryansky, M., Levine, J. P., & Gurtner, G. C. (2004). Quantitative and reproducible murine model of excisional wound healing. Wound Repair and Regeneration. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.12404.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.