The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Typology of Virtual Communities: A Multi-Disciplinary Foundation for Future Research
Abstract
Despite the growing popularity of virtual communities, there is no consensus among researchers regarding the appropriate definition or types of virtual communities. In this paper, a virtual community is defined as an aggregation of individuals or business partners who interact around a shared interest, where the interaction is at least partially supported and/or mediated by technology and guided by some protocols or norms. The central objective of developing this typology was to develop a classification system that would be useful to researchers from various disciplinary perspectives such that the classification system might be used as a foundation for theory construction. The proposed typology serves its intended purposes and is evaluated against criteria put forth by Hunt (1991). The proposed typology uses establishment type and relationship orientation as the key categorization variables, reconciling problems posed by other researchers who attempt to use attributes as categorization variables. It is simple, pragmatic for practitioners and useful for researchers seeking to develop an understanding of the virtual community phenomenon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Muniz, A. M., & O'Guinn, T. C. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/319618 · Cited by 3,998
Designing Virtual Customer Environments for New Product Development: Toward a Theory
Nambisan, S. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7389914 · Cited by 1,026
Cited by
Textual paralanguage and its implications for marketing communications
Luangrath, A. W., Peck, J., & Barger, V. A. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2016.05.002 · Cited by 221
Motivational Drivers of Content Contribution to Company‐ Versus Consumer‐Hosted Online Communities
Teichmann, K., Stokburger‐Sauer, N. E., Plank, A., & Strobl, A. (2015) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20783 · Cited by 86
Russo, G., Verginer, L., Horta Ribeiro, M., & Casiraghi, G. (2023) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22184 · Cited by 32
Informal Learning Communities: The Other Massive Open Online 'C'
Hudgins, W., Lynch, M., Schmal, A., Sikka, H., Swenson, M., & Joyner, D. A. (2020) · Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale · doi:10.1145/3386527.3405926 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Porter, C. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-06-23
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 00-00
- ISSN
- 1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047031485
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 140.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.