Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is There an Elite Hold? Traditional Media to Social Media Agenda Setting Influence in Blog Networks

Open access
Meraz, Sharon·2009·Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Abstract

According to several 2008 reports, blogging continues to attract writers and readers (Comscore Media Matrix, 2008; eMarketer, 2008; Sifry, 2008; Universal McCann, 2008). This form of Web content creation has matured beyond public personal journaling to support citizen journalism or journalism produced by independent bloggers unaffiliated with professional newsrooms (Lenhart & Fox, 2006). The popularity of blogs is in part fueled by its interactive format: The blog tool is popularly believed to be a vehicle of democracy because it fosters decentralized citizen control as opposed to hierarchical, elite control (Crumlish, 2004; Levine, Locke, Searls, & Weinberger, 2001; Rosen, 2006; Scoble & Israel, 2006; Suroweicki, 2005; Weinberger, 2003, 2008). This inversion of elite control is the social outcome of a more interactive format. Blogs are popularly viewed as a form of social media, or media that is architected by design to readily support participation, peer-to-peer conversation, collaboration, and community (O’Reilly, 2004). Social media tools such as blogs enable Web content creators to circumvent the high transaction costs that once characterized usage of earlier media technologies (Gillmor, 2004; Benkler, 2006; Bowman & Willis, 2003; Shirky, 2008). Independent political bloggers that comment on day-to-day news command a readership rivaling that of traditional media entities (Armstrong & Moulitsas Zuniga, 2006). The initial public derision heaped by traditional media entities on these independent bloggers unaffiliated with traditional, professional newsrooms (Rosen, 2005) continues to wane as these bloggers gain respect among Web readers (Johnson & Kaye, 2004). Top independent political bloggers have played an influential role in holding public officials accountable from Trent Lott to Dan Rather (Meraz, 2008). The blog form has matured to resemble traditional journalism in form and practice: Top, independent bloggers now hire editors, blog full-time, and engage in investigative journalism acts (Stoller, 2007; Strupp, 2008). The growth in the independent political blogger's credibility has taken place against the backdrop of traditional media's loss of a media monopoly on news creation and dissemination (Gillmor, 2004; Rosen, 2006). In an effort to survive, traditional newsrooms have embraced newsroom blogs as an alternative vehicle for news delivery (Meraz, 2008). This trend in traditional media blogging first grew to public visibility in the United States during the 2004 Democratic and Republican national conventions when traditional media bloggers showed up to “live-blog” these events with top independent political bloggers who were given press passes (Meraz, 2005). This study questions the agenda setting and social influence of elite traditional media outlets both among top independent political bloggers and among elite newsroom blogs. Using the hyperlink as an external marker of source influence, this study assesses hyperlink usage across three diverse issues in 2007 within the 11 newsroom political blogs of the New York Times and the Washington Post and within 18 top U.S. independent political blogs across the political spectrum. The timeliness of this study is underscored by two central concerns. Firstly, blogs have been widely heralded as a “democratizing innovation” (Von Hippel, 2005, Bruns, 2005, 2008); yet, this study questions whether citizen media outlets are really inverting the power structure between citizens and elite traditional media entities (Armstrong & Moulitsas Zuniga, 2006; Reynolds, 2006) through analyzing source influence. Secondly, this study examines how traditional media is utilizing the blog tool. The question can be posed: Do elite media entities utilize their newsroom political blogs as tools for forging networked conversations with the best of independent political blogging, or has it continued to “normalize the blog form” (Singer, 2005) with insular and parochial linking practices to other traditional mass media newsrooms? Such practices would indicate that this “more of the same journalism” may not be an effective gatekeeping practice for traditional newsrooms who seek to reconnect with engaged Web publics. Agenda setting has systematically sought to document the effects of mass media on the audience's cognitions. By virtue of creating a shared, national pseudo-environment, mass media fulfill the important function of building a public consensus on the important issues of the day (Lippmann, 1949; McCombs, 1997; McCombs, 2004). As one of the more enduring and most researched theories in mass communication and political communication (Bryant & Miron, 2004; McCombs, 2004; Weaver, 2007), agenda setting has matured as a theory to include a second-level agenda setting component (attribute agenda setting), a psychological component to explain individual-level agenda setting effects (need for orientation), an emphasis on how the media's agenda is shaped, and an explanation for the

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01458.x

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Anderson, 2006, The long tail: Why the future of business is selling more of less.
  2. Bowers, 2007, New establishment rising: The end of the flat blogosphere, Journal of Netroots Ideas
  3. Comscore Media Matrix. (2008). Huffington Post and Politico lead wave of explosive growth at independent political blogs and news sites this election season. Retrieved October 28, 2008, from http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=2525.
  4. Cornfield, 2005, Buzz, blogs, and beyond: The Internet and the national discourse in the fall of 2004, Pew Internet & American Life Project
  5. Crumlish, 2004, The power of many: How the living Web is transforming politics, business, and everyday life.
  6. Einsiedel, 1984, Crime effects of media exposure and personal experience on issue salience, Journalism Quarterly, 61, 131, 10.1177/107769908406100118 · doi:10.1177/107769908406100118
  7. Glaser, 200828, Distinction between bloggers, journalists, blurring more than ever, MediaShift
  8. Katz, 1992, The end of journalism? Notes on watching the war, Journal of Communication, 42, 5, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00793.x · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00793.x
  9. Kottke, 2003, Weblogs and power laws, Kottke
  10. Lasica, 1996, Net gain, American Journalism Review, 18, 20
  11. Leadbeater, 2004, The Pro-Am revolution, Demos
  12. Lim, 2006, A Cross lagged analysis of agenda setting among online media, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 298, 10.1177/107769900608300205 · doi:10.1177/107769900608300205
  13. Lippmann, 1949, Public opinion.
  14. Lopez-Escobar, 1998, Two levels of agenda setting among advertising and news in the 1995 Spanish general elections, Political Communication, 15, 225, 10.1080/10584609809342367 · doi:10.1080/10584609809342367
  15. MacKuen, 1981, More than news: Media power in public affairs.
  16. Meraz, 2008, Women, men, and news.
  17. Moore, J. (2003). The second superpower rears its beautiful head. Retrieved October 27, 2008, from http://www.extremedemocracy.com/chapters/Chapter%20Two-Moore.pdf.
  18. Reese, 1989, Communication campaigns about drugs: Government, media, public, 29
  19. Rosen, 2006, The people formerly called the audience, PressThink
  20. Rosen, 2005, Bloggers vs journalists is over, PressThink
  21. Shoemaker, 1991, Mediating the message: Theories of influence on mass media content.
  22. Sifry, 2008, State of the blogosphere, Technorati
  23. Smith, 1987, Newspaper coverage and public concern about community issues: A time series analysis, Journalism Monographs, 101
  24. Stoller, 2007, What is this new movement, TPM Café
  25. Suroweicki, 2005, The wisdom of crowds.
  26. Thompson, 2006, Blogs to riches: The haves and have nots of the blogging boom, New York Magazine
  27. Trench, 2003, Online news and changing models of journalism, Irish Communication Review
  28. Tremayne, 2004, The web of context: Applying network theory to the use of hyperlinks in journalism on the web, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 237, 10.1177/107769900408100202 · doi:10.1177/107769900408100202
  29. Weaver, 1981, Media agenda-setting in a presidential election: Issues, images, and interests.
  30. Weinberger, 2008, Everything is miscellaneous.
  31. Winter, 1982, Issue-specific agenda setting: The whole as less than the sum of its parts, Canadian Journal of Communication, 8, 1, 10.22230/cjc.1982v8n2a268 · doi:10.22230/cjc.1982v8n2a268
  32. Yagade, 1990, The media agenda-setting effect of concrete versus abstract issues, Journalism Quarterly, 67, 3, 10.1177/107769909006700102 · doi:10.1177/107769909006700102
  33. Zucker, 1978, Communication yearbook, 225

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Meraz, S.
Venue
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Published
2009-04
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
682-707
ISSN
1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095065410
Cited by
431
References
59
FWCI
55.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 2344 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is There an Elite Hold? Traditional Media to Social Media Agenda Setting Influence in Blog Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01458.x
The paper
Meraz, S. (2009). Is There an Elite Hold? Traditional Media to Social Media Agenda Setting Influence in Blog Networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01458.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.