Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Political elites or opinion leaders who share moralized content behave in distinct ways depending on their ideological orientations.
“Prior work illustrates that these findings translate robustly to the digital sphere -political elites or opinion leaders who share moralized content behave in distinct ways depending on their ideological orientations [4].”
From Affective Polarization in Online Climate Change Discourse on Twitter (2020) · cites this paper as [4]
Cites
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652 · see citing works
Whitmarsh, L. (2009) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662506073088 · Cited by 448 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Previous studies suggest that climate change skeptics tend to use ‘‘global warming’’ instead of ‘‘climate change’’ to discredit the authenticity of scientific claims (Schuldt et al., 2011; Villar and Krosnick, 2011; Whitmarsh, 2009).”
BackgroundPublic microblogging on climate change: One year of Twitter worldwide
Kirilenko, A. P., & Stepchenkova, S. O. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Australian politicians’ beliefs about climate change: political partisanship and political ideology
Fielding, K. S., Head, B. W., Laffan, W., Western, M., & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (2012) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2012.698887 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Jang, S. M. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.003 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media
Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662519869097 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., & Lloyd, E. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1198-6 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Brüggemann, M., & Meyer, H. (2023) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtad012 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Affective Polarization in Online Climate Change Discourse on Twitter
Tyagi, A., Uyheng, J., & Carley, K. M. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1109/asonam49781.2020.9381419 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“In other words, online discussions about climate change are interactionally polarized, implying the persistence of echo chambers between Believers and Disbelievers [17]–[19].”
BackgroundInfluentialBetween calls for action and narratives of denial: Climate change attention structures on Twitter
Meyer, H., Peach, A. K., Guenther, L., Kedar, H. E., & Brüggemann, M. (2023) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v11i1.6111 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Jang, S. M., & Oh, Y. W. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815583491 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationYuan, S., Chen, Y., Vojta, S., & Chen, Y. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221122202 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jang, S. M., & Hart, P. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- ORCID
- Hart, P. Sol
- Venue
- Global Environmental Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 32
- Pages
- 11-17
- ISSN
- 0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040403711
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 63.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Rhetoric and Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Keywords
- climate change, global warming, media frames, political polarization, red states, blue states, Twitter conversations, public opinion, environmental communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
