Cited by 400Personality Traits and PsychologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Online Impression Management: Personality Traits and Concerns for Secondary Goals as Predictors of Self-Presentation Tactics on Facebook

Open access
Rosenberg, Jenny, Egbert, Nichole·2011·Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Abstract

This study investigates the utility of personality traits and secondary goals as predictors of self-presentation tactics employed by Facebook users. A structural equation model of self-presentation tactics on Facebook was proposed and tested. Although fit of the initial model was good, the final model, eliminating three paths and adding two others, yielded a significantly better fitting model. Findings show that personality traits predicted concern for secondary goals (N = 477) and that secondary goals predicted the use of various self-presentation tactics used on Facebook. Results indicated that these personality traits and secondary goals are both theoretically and empirically sound components for the conceptualization of online impression management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01560.x

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Daly, 1994, Strategic interpersonal communication, 109
  2. Fager, 2010, 60 Minutes: Mark Zuckerberg & Facebook [Television broadcast].
  3. Stutzman, 2006, An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities., Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association, 3, 10

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 400

Metadata

Authors
Rosenberg, J., & Egbert, N.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rosenberg, Jenny
Venue
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Published
2011-10
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026082410
Cited by
399
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 10
FWCI
22.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
self-presentation tactics, personality traits, Facebook, social networking sites, self-presentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review