Cited by 2,176Political Philosophy and EthicsPhilosophical Ethics and TheoryWar, Ethics, and Justification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Problem of Global Justice

NAGEL, THOMAS·2005·Philosophy & Public Affairs

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00027.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • International norms often frame, or even determine, political decisions within individual states.

    “International norms often frame, or even determine, political decisions within individual states.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
NAGEL, T.
Corresponding author
NAGEL, THOMAS
Venue
Philosophy & Public Affairs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
113-147
ISSN
  • 0048-3915 (ISSN-L)
  • 1088-4963
OpenAlex
W2054081676
Cited by
2,176
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 253 · 2018: 114 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 310 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 101
FWCI
261.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophy & Public Affairs (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › War, Ethics, and Justification
Keywords
global justice, distributive justice, global poverty, global ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review