The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Problem of Global Justice
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
International norms often frame, or even determine, political decisions within individual states.
“International norms often frame, or even determine, political decisions within individual states.”
From No Global Demos, No Global Democracy? A Systematization and Critique (2014) · cites this paper as [102]
Citations
Cites
Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy
Blake, M. (2001) · Philosophy & Public Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00257.x · Cited by 982
McClennen, E. F. (1974) · Social Theory and Practice · doi:10.5840/soctheorpract19743114 · Cited by 634
Institutions and the Demands of Justice
MURPHY, L. B. (1998) · Philosophy & Public Affairs · doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00071.x · Cited by 596
Beitz, C. R. (2000) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/233369 · Cited by 275
What Self-Governing Peoples Owe to One Another: Universalism, Diversity, and the “Law of Peoples”
Macedo, S. (2005) · Brill | Nijhoff eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789047416005_010 · Cited by 79
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
No Global Demos, No Global Democracy? A Systematization and Critique
Valentini, L. (2014) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592714002138 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- NAGEL, T.
- Corresponding author
- NAGEL, THOMAS
- ORCID
- NAGEL, THOMAS
- Venue
- Philosophy & Public Affairs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-147
- ISSN
- 0048-3915 (ISSN-L)
- 1088-4963
- OpenAlex
- W2054081676
- Cited by
- 2,176
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 253 · 2018: 114 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 310 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 101
- FWCI
- 261.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophy & Public Affairs (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › War, Ethics, and Justification
- Keywords
- global justice, distributive justice, global poverty, global ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review