Cited by 1,157Political Philosophy and EthicsPolitical Theory and DemocracyGame Theory and Voting Systems

Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives

GOODIN, ROBERT E.·2007·Philosophy & Public Affairs

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are genuine global concerns, such as international trade, finance, and anthropogenic climate change.

    “Interestingly, even critics of global democracy acknowledge that today we are faced with genuine global concerns, such as international trade, finance, and anthropogenic climate change.”
  • The democratic boundary problem arises because the units within which democratic decision procedures operate cannot themselves be constituted democratically.

    “The democratic boundary problem arises because it appears that the units within which democratic decision procedures will operate cannot themselves be constituted democratically.”

    From Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem (2020) · cites this paper as Goodin, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GOODIN, R. E.
Corresponding author
GOODIN, ROBERT E.
Venue
Philosophy & Public Affairs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
40-68
ISSN
  • 0048-3915 (ISSN-L)
  • 1088-4963
OpenAlex
W2033133948
Cited by
1,157
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 255 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 49
FWCI
107.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Philosophy & Public Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
Keywords
enfranchisement, just compensation, property rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review