Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are genuine global concerns, such as international trade, finance, and anthropogenic climate change.
“Interestingly, even critics of global democracy acknowledge that today we are faced with genuine global concerns, such as international trade, finance, and anthropogenic climate change.”
From No Global Demos, No Global Democracy? A Systematization and Critique (2014) · cites this paper as [63]
The democratic boundary problem arises because the units within which democratic decision procedures operate cannot themselves be constituted democratically.
“The democratic boundary problem arises because it appears that the units within which democratic decision procedures will operate cannot themselves be constituted democratically.”
From Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem (2020) · cites this paper as Goodin, 2007
Cites
A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision
May, K. O. (1952) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1907651 · Cited by 1,578 · see citing works
Margalit, A., & Raz, J. (1990) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2026968 · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
What is So Special about Our Fellow Countrymen?
Goodin, R. E. (1988) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/292998 · Cited by 668 · see citing works
Self-citationHabermas, J. (2001) · Political Theory · doi:10.1177/0090591701029006002 · Cited by 513 · see citing works
A Core Precautionary Principle*
Gardiner, S. M. (2006) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00237.x · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory
Harsanyi, J. C. (1980) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-9327-9_4 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Decision-Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional Choice
Rae, D. W. (1969) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055400261467 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Føllesdal, A. (1998) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00052 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Enfranchising the Earth, and its Alternatives
Goodin, R. E. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00337.x · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Self-citationGoodin, R. E. (1989) · Oxford Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1093/ojls/9.1.56 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Place of the Dead in Liberal Political Philosophy
Mulgan, T. (1999) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00065 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Saving Scanlon: Contractualism and Agent‐Relativity
Ridge, M. (2001) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00137 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory
Arrhenius, G. (2005) · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A problem-based approach to democratic theory
WARREN, M. E. (2017) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055416000605 · Cited by 478 · see citing works
Voting with your feet: Exit-based empowerment in democratic theory
WARREN, M. E. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055411000323 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Populism and Democratic Theory
Mansbridge, J., & Macedo, S. (2019) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042843 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
No Global Demos, No Global Democracy? A Systematization and Critique
Valentini, L. (2014) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592714002138 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Reconceiving the democratic boundary problem
Miller, D. (2020) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12707 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“1 It might be said that it points us towards global democracy: in principle, the demos is unbounded (Abizadeh, 2008; Goodin, 2007).”
BackgroundReorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory
Jourdeuil, K. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423924000416 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- GOODIN, R. E.
- Corresponding author
- GOODIN, ROBERT E.
- ORCID
- GOODIN, ROBERT E.
- Venue
- Philosophy & Public Affairs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-68
- ISSN
- 0048-3915 (ISSN-L)
- 1088-4963
- OpenAlex
- W2033133948
- Cited by
- 1,157
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 255 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 107.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophy & Public Affairs (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Keywords
- enfranchisement, just compensation, property rights
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review