Phylogenetic analysis and classification of fossil and recent Alcelaphini Mammalia: Bovidae
Abstract
Cladistic principles are applied to a group of antelope species, three-quarters of which are extinct. Only cranial and mandibular characters are used. The present phylogenetic hypothesis suggests diat the Alcelaphini are monophyletic; that the genera Parmularius and Damaliscus share a recent common ancestry; and that die extant Hunter's hartebeest should not be removed from Damaliscus into a separate genus Beatragus as several authors have done. A re-evaluation is suggested of die systematic position of Lichtenstein's hartebeest, as being phylogenetically closer to me wildebeests, genus Connochaetes, than to the type species of the hartebeest genus Alcelaphus. Some problems arising in the application of cladistic principles to such a low ranking group, treating die fossil majority exactly equivalently with recent taxa, are discussed. Comments on recency of common ancestry as it affects hybridization potential in bovids, on speciation and extinction rates arise.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lag in compensation for Damaliscus hunteri is ~2.5 Myr, the minimum estimate of the divergence time for D. hunteri and D. dorcas.
“This lag in compensation is ~2.5 Myr, the minimum estimate of the divergence time for D. hunteri and D. dorcas (Vrba 1979(Vrba , 1985)).”
From Phylogeny of the Bovidae (Artiodactyla, Mammalia), based on mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. (1992) · cites this paper as Vrba 1979
Convergent evolution is rampant in the Bovidae as well as in other ruminants.
“First, it has been demonstrated that convergent evolution is rampant in the Bovidae as well as in other ruminants (Vrba 1979;Janis and Scott 1987).”
From Phylogeny of the Bovidae (Artiodactyla, Mammalia), based on mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. (1992) · cites this paper as Vrba 1979
Cites
Origin and Evolution of the Elephantidae
Maglio, V. J. (1973) · Transactions of the American Philosophical Society · doi:10.2307/1006229 · Cited by 588 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phylogeny of the Bovidae (Artiodactyla, Mammalia), based on mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences.
(1992) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040734 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
- Authors
- VRBA, E. S.
- Affiliations
- Ditsong National Museum of Natural History (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- VRBA, E. S.
- Venue
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1979-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 207-228
- ISSN
- 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028084189
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Keywords
- Bovidae, antelope, phylogenetic classification, fossil taxon, monophyly, Connochaetes, hybridization potential, speciation and extinction rates, cladistic analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review