The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progressive background in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis
Abstract
A method is presented for quantitative estimation of the degree of crypsis of species seen by visual predators against known backgrounds. It is based upon a comparison between transects taken across animal and background colour patterns. The method was applied to day-resting moths in deciduous forest in New Jersey. Each species is found for two to four weeks at characteristic dates, and there is a constant turnover of species. In both moths and backgrounds there is a regular change in the colour pattern parameters from winter through spring to early summer. Moths are on average more cryptic at their normal dates than they would be if present earlier or later in the year. Species with known resting sites are on average more cryptic on their resting sites than other background habitats. Species that rest on more than one background habitat are less cryptic on their preferred habitats than are specialists. Species that rest under leaves and are not visible from above are not very cryptic. Specific v. general resemblance, disruptive coloration, and factors affecting ‘aspect diversity’ are discussed. The new method of estimating crypsis is useful for studies of crypsis as well as in sexual selection. It is necessary to know much about the resting sites and behaviour of moths, as well as other functions of colour patterns, to understand colour pattern evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences
McGinn, L. C. (1957) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(57)90766-4 · Cited by 7,204
AN INTRODUCTION TO MATHEMATICAL ECOLOGY
Levins, R. (1970) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1970.tb01782.x · Cited by 4,016
Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
Stuart, A., & Siegel, S. (1957) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2551606 · Cited by 3,383
An Introduction to the Study of Insects
(1954) · AIBS Bulletin · doi:10.1093/aibsbulletin/4.5.11f · Cited by 1,614
NATURAL SELECTION ON COLOR PATTERNS IN POECILIA RETICULATA
Endler, J. A. (1980) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04790.x · Cited by 1,424
Self-citationAdaptive Coloration in Animals
Schmidt, K. P., & Cott, H. B. (1941) · Copeia · doi:10.2307/1437762 · Cited by 1,318
A Predator’s View of Animal Color Patterns
Endler, J. A. (1978) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6956-5_5 · Cited by 1,181
Self-citationLYTHGOE, J. N. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,161
Lubchenco, J. (1978) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283250 · Cited by 1,094
The Adaptive Geometry of Trees
Wickens, G. E., & Horn, H. S. (1972) · Kew Bulletin · doi:10.2307/4109478 · Cited by 1,012
Cited by
Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals
Guilford, T., & Dawkins, M. S. (1991) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80600-1 · Cited by 1,019
Frequency-dependent selection by predators
Allen, J. A. (1988) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1988.0061 · Cited by 329
Burtt (1986) · Ornithological Monographs · doi:10.2307/40166782 · Cited by 130
Howlett, R. J., & Majerus, M. E. N. (1987) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb00286.x · Cited by 72
LIEBERT, T. G., & BRAKEFIELD, P. M. (1987) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb01985.x · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- ENDLER, J. A.
- Venue
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 187-231
- ISSN
- 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055058665
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progressive background in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb01677.x
- The paper
- ENDLER, J. A. (1984). Progressive background in moths, and a quantitative measure of crypsis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1984.tb01677.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.