The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How many species of arthropods? Erwin's estimate revised
Open accessAbstract
Erwin's much debated estimate of 30 million species of arthropods is revised. The original estimate is based on the evaluation of host specificity of guilds in beetle samples, and subsequent hierarchical ratio extrapolations. The growing number of studies including mass sampling of arthropods have provided several data sets suitable for obtaining an empirical basis of this estimate. The structure in this modified version is somewhat changed compared to the original estimate in order to make each hierarchical step more easily testable. Plant species are separated into different growth forms, and host specificity measures are based only on phytophagous species. Effective specialization is applied as a measure of host specificity to correct for the fauna shared between plant species. A between community correction factor is applied to correct for differences in host specificity at different spatial scales. There are still great uncertainties attended with such estimates. The largest problems refer to the between community correction factor and the proportion of canopy species to total species. Further work on host specificity and the least known hyperdiverse groups are also needed. The revised version of the estimate does not support hyperestimates of 30 100 million species. Rather, it compares nicely with estimates derived from other estimation methods, indicating a global arthropod species richness of 5–10 million species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How Many Species Are There on Earth?
May, R. M. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.241.4872.1441 · Cited by 1,187
Flora of Barro Colorado Island
S., F. A., & Croat, T. B. (1979) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/1219834 · Cited by 1,130
TROPICAL FORESTS: THEIR RICHNESS IN COLEOPTERA AND OTHER ARTHROPOD SPECIES
Erwin, T. L. (1982) · Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) · Cited by 950
Global Biodiversity: status of the Earth's living resources
(1992) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.44956 · Cited by 941
Patterns of Neotropical Plant Species Diversity
Gentry, A. H. (1982) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6968-8_1 · Cited by 914
Specialization: Species Property or Local Phenomenon?
Fox, L. R., & Morrow, P. A. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.211.4485.887 · Cited by 850
Plant Architecture and the Diversity of Phytophagous Insects
Lawton, J. H. (1983) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.28.010183.000323 · Cited by 840
Tropical Rain Forest: Ecology and Management.
Prance, G. T., Sutton, S. L., Whitmore, T. C., & Chadwick, A. C. (1984) · Brittonia · doi:10.2307/2806633 · Cited by 697
Shorrocks, B., Strong, D. R., Lawton, J. H., et al. (1984) · Cited by 603
Cited by
Sequence-Based Species Delimitation for the DNA Taxonomy of Undescribed Insects
Pons, J., Barraclough, T. G., Gomez-Zurita, J., Cardoso, A., Duran, D. P., Hazell, S., Kamoun, S., Sumlin, W. D., & Vogler, A. P. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150600852011 · Cited by 2,775
How Many Species of Insects and Other Terrestrial Arthropods Are There on Earth?
Stork, N. E. (2018) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043348 · Cited by 1,537
Kennedy, D. O., & Wightman, E. L. (2011) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.110.000117 · Cited by 684
What we know and don’t know about Earth's missing biodiversity
Scheffers, B. R., Joppa, L. N., Pimm, S. L., & Laurance, W. F. (2012) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.05.008 · Cited by 437
How many named species are valid?
Alroy, J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.062691099 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- ØDEGAARD, F.
- Venue
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 583-597
- ISSN
- 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139667401
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How many species of arthropods? Erwin's estimate revised. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1006/bijl.2000.0468
- The paper
- ØDEGAARD, F. (2000). How many species of arthropods? Erwin's estimate revised. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.2000.0468
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.