Cited by 684Medicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionMedicinal Plant Extracts EffectsMedicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds

Herbal extracts and phytochemicals: Plant secondary metabolites and the enhancement of human brain function

Open access
Kennedy, David O., Wightman, Emma L.·2011·Advances in Nutrition

Abstract

Humans consume a wide range of foods, drugs, and dietary supplements that are derived from plants and which modify the functioning of the central nervous sytem (CNS). The psychoactive properties of these substances are attributable to the presence of plant secondary metabolites, chemicals that are not required for the immediate survival of the plant but which are synthesized to increase the fitness of the plant to survive by allowing it to interact with its environment, including pathogens and herbivorous and symbiotic insects. In many cases, the effects of these phytochemicals on the human CNS might be linked either to their ecological roles in the life of the plant or to molecular and biochemical similarities in the biology of plants and higher animals. This review assesses the current evidence for the efficacy of a range of readily available plant-based extracts and chemicals that may improve brain function and which have attracted sufficient research in this regard to reach a conclusion as to their potential effectiveness as nootropics. Many of these candidate phytochemicals/extracts can be grouped by the chemical nature of their potentially active secondary metabolite constituents into alkaloids (caffeine, nicotine), terpenes (ginkgo, ginseng, valerian, Melissa officinalis, sage), and phenolic compounds (curcumin, resveratrol, epigallocatechin-3-gallate, Hypericum perforatum, soy isoflavones). They are discussed in terms of how an increased understanding of the relationship between their ecological roles and CNS effects might further the field of natural, phytochemical drug discovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/an.110.000117

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The formation and concentration of phenols is species and stressor dependent.

    “whose formation and concentration is species and stressor dependent [22,24]”

    From Mars Regolith Simulant Ameliorated by Compost as in situ Cultivation Substrate Improves Lettuce Growth and Nutritional Aspects (2020) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Phenolics section says phenolic compounds are induced by bacterial or fungal attack, supporting stressor-dependent formation. It does not establish that their formation or concentration varies by plant species, or that concentration varies by stressor. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 95

  1. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years. J Nat Prod. 2007;70:461-77.
  2. National Institute of Clinical Excellence. NICE technology appraisal guidance. Donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine (review) and meman- tine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (amended). London: Na- tional Institute of Clinical Excellence; 2009.
  3. Bent S. Herbal medicine in the United States: review of efficacy, safety, and regulation. Grand rounds at University of California, San Francis- co Medical Center. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:854-9.
  4. Pimentel D, Andow DA. Pest-management and pesticide impacts. In- sect Sci Appl. 1984;5:141-9.
  5. Reymond P, Weber H, Damond M, Farmer EE. Differential gene ex- pression in response to mechanical wounding and insect feeding in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2000;12:707-19.
  6. Hermsmeier D, Schittko U, Baldwin IT. Molecular interactions be- tween the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingi- dae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. I. Large-scale changes in the accumulation of growth-and defense-related plant mRNAs. Plant Physiol. 2001;125:683-700.
  7. Harborne J. R. Introduction to ecological biochemistry. 4th ed. Lon- don: Elsevier; 1993.
  8. Gershenzon J. The cost of plant chemical defense against herbivory: a biochemical perspective. In: Bernays EA, editor. Insect-plant interac- tions. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1994. p. 105-73.
  9. Tahara S. A journey of twenty-five years through the ecological bio- chemistry of flavonoids. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007;71:1387-404.
  10. Wink M. Evolution of secondary metabolites from an ecological and molecular phylogenetic perspective. Phytochemistry. 2003;64:3-19.
  11. Rattan RS. Mechanism of action of insecticidal secondary metabolites of plant origin. Crop Prot. 2010;29:913-20.
  12. Wink M. Interference of alkaloids with neuroreceptors and ion chan- nels. Stud Nat Prod Chem. 2000;21:3-122.
  13. Miller AE, Heyland A. Endocrine interactions between plants and an- imals: Implications of exogenous hormone sources for the evolution of hormone signaling. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010;166:455-61.
  14. Schoonhoven L, Van Loon J, Dicke M. Insect-plant biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  15. Ødegaard F. How many species of arthropods? Erwin's estimate re- vised. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2000;71:583-97.
  16. Bernays E, Graham M. On the evolution of host specificity in phy- tophagous arthropods. Ecology. 1988;69:886-92.
  17. Ehrlich PR, Raven PH. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution. 1964;18:586-608.
  18. Kawashima K, Misawa H, Moriwaki Y, Fujii Y, Fujii T, Horiuchi Y, Yamada T, Imanaka T, Kamekura M. Ubiquitous expression of acetyl- choline and its biological functions in life forms without nervous sys- tems. Life Sci. 2007;80:2206-9.
  19. Scott JG, Liu N, Wen Z. Insect cytochromes P450: diversity, insecticide resistance and tolerance to plant toxins. 1. Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol. 1998;121:147-55.
  20. Kushiro T, Nambara E, McCourt P. Hormone evolution: the key to signalling. Nature. 2003;422:122.
  21. Palavan-Unsal N, Arisan D. Nitric oxide signalling in plants. Bot Rev. 2009;75:203-29.
  22. Dalle-Donne I, Rossi R, Colombo G, Giustarini D, Milzani A. Protein S-glutathionylation: a regulatory device from bacteria to humans. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34:85-96.
  23. Scandalios JG. Oxidative stress: molecular perception and transduc- tion of signals triggering antioxidant gene defenses. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005;38:995-1014.
  24. Lee D-S, Nioche P, Hamberg M, Raman CS. Structural insights into the evolutionary paths of oxylipin biosynthetic enzymes. Nature. 2008;455:363-8.
  25. Thoma I, Krischke M, Loeffler C, Mueller MJ. The isoprostanoid pathway in plants. Chem Phys Lipids. 2004;128:135-48.
  26. Iriti M, Faoro F. Review of innate and specific immunity in plants and animals. Mycopathologia. 2007;164:57-64.
  27. Belhadj A, Saigne C, Telef N, Cluzet S, Bouscaut J, Corio-Costet MF, Merillon JM. Methyl jasmonate induces defense responses in grape- vine and triggers protection against Erysiphe necator. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:9119-25.
  28. Cohen S, Flescher E. Methyl jasmonate: a plant stress hormone as an anti-cancer drug. Phytochemistry. 2009;70:1600-9.
  29. Nässel DR, Winther AM. Drosophila neuropeptides in regulation of physiology and behavior. Prog Neurobiol. 2010;92:42-104.
  30. Klowden MJ. Physiological systems in insects. London: Academic Press; 2007.
  31. Marder E. Searching for insight. In: North G, Greenspan RJ, editors. Invertebrate neurobiology. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2007.
  32. Wolf FW, Heberlein U. Invertebrate models of drug abuse. J Neuro- biol. 2003;54:161-78.
  33. Farooqui T. Octopamine-mediated neuromodulation of insect senses. Neurochem Res. 2007;32:1511-29.
  34. Daniels RW, Gelfand MV, Collins CA, Diantonio A. Visualizing gluta- matergic cell bodies and synapses in Drosophila larval and adult CNS. J Comp Neurol. 2008;508:131-52.
  35. Ismail N, Christine S, Robinson GE, Fahrbach SE. Pilocarpine im- proves recognition of nestmates in young honey bees. Neurosci Lett. 2008;439:178-81.
  36. Dacher M, Gauthier M. Involvement of NO-synthase and nicotinic receptors in learning in the honey bee. Physiol Behav. 2008;95: 200-7.
  37. Nakatani Y, Matsumoto Y, Mori Y, Hirashima D, Nishino H, Arikawa K, Mizunami M. Why the carrot is more effective than the stick: dif- ferent dynamics of punishment memory and reward memory and its possible biological basis. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009;92:370-80.
  38. Menzel R, Manz G. Neural plasticity of mushroom body-extrinsic neurons in the honeybee brain. J Exp Biol. 2005;208:4317-32.
  39. Matsumoto Y, Hatano A, Unoki S, Mizunami M. Stimulation of the cAMP system by the nitric oxide-cGMP system underlying the for- mation of long-term memory in an insect. Neurosci Lett. 2009;467: 81-5.
  40. Glanzman DL. Simple minds: the neurobiology of invertebrate learn- ing and memory. In: North G, Greenspan RJ, editors. Invertebrate neurobiology. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Labora- tory Press; 2007.
  41. Giurfa M. Invertebrate cognition: nonelemental learning beyond sim- ple conditioning. In: North G, Greenspan RJ, editors. Invertebrate neurobiology. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Labora- tory Press; 2007.
  42. Menzel R. Electrophysiology and optophysiology of complex brain functions in insects. In: North G, Greenspan RJ, editors. Invertebrate neurobiology. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Labora- tory Press; 2007.
  43. Mixson TA, Abramson CI, Bozi J. The behavior and social communi- cation of honey bees (Apis mellifera carnica) poll.) Under the influ- ence of alcohol 1, 2. Psychol Rep. 2010;106:701-17.
  44. Catterson JH, Knowles-Barley S, James K, Heck MM, Harmar AJ, Hartley PS. Dietary modulation of Drosophila sleep-wake behaviour. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e12062.
  45. Ho KS, Sehgal A. Drosophila melanogaster: an insect model for fun- damental studies of sleep. Methods Enzymol. 2005;393:772-93.
  46. Horiuchi J, Saitoe M. Can flies shed light on our own age-related memory impairment? Ageing Res Rev. 2005;4:83-101.
  47. Thamm M, Balfanz S, Scheiner R, Baumann A, Blenau W. Character- ization of the 5-HT 1A receptor of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) and involvement of serotonin in phototactic behavior. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67:2467-79. Plant secondary metabolites and brain function 43
  48. Mustard JA, Pham PM, Smith BH. Modulation of motor behavior by dopamine and the D1-like dopamine receptor AmDOP2 in the honey bee. J Insect Physiol. 2010;56:422-30.
  49. El Hassani AK, Dupuis JP, Gauthier M, Armengaud C. Glutamatergic and GABAergic effects of fipronil on olfactory learning and memory in the honeybee. Invert Neurosci. 2009;9:91-100.
  50. El Hassani AK, Giurfa M, Gauthier M, Armengaud C. Inhibitory neu- rotransmission and olfactory memory in honeybees. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2008;90:589-95.
  51. Guez D, Zhu H, Zhang S, Srinivasan M. Enhanced cholinergic trans- mission promotes recall in honeybees. J Insect Physiol. 2010;56:1341- 8.
  52. Schultz JC. Shared signals and the potential for phylogenetic espio- nage between plants and animals. Integr Comp Biol. 2002;42:454- 62.
  53. Zhang ZJ. Therapeutic effects of herbal extracts and constituents in animal models of psychiatric disorders. Life Sci. 2004;75:1659-99.
  54. Zulak K, Liscombe D, Ashihara H, Facchini P. Alkaloids. Plant second- ary metabolism in diet and human health. Oxford: Blackwell Publish- ing; 2006. p. 102-36.
  55. Goldman P. Herbal medicines today and the roots of modern pharma- cology. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:594-600.
  56. Zenk MH, Juenger M. Evolution and current status of the phytochem- istry of nitrogenous compounds. Phytochemistry. 2007;68:2757-72.
  57. Hagen EH, Sullivan RJ, Schmidt R, Morris G, Kempter R, Hammer- stein P. Ecology and neurobiology of toxin avoidance and the paradox of drug reward. Neuroscience. 2009;160:69-84.
  58. Ashihara H, Sano H, Crozier A. Caffeine and related purine alkaloids: biosynthesis, catabolism, function and genetic engineering. Phyto- chemistry. 2008;69:841-56.
  59. Baumann T, Gabriel H. Metabolism and excretion of caffeine during germination of Coffea arabica L. Plant Cell Physiol. 1984;25:1431.
  60. Shaw PJ, Cirelli C, Greenspan RJ, Tononi G. Correlates of sleep and waking in Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2000;287:1834.
  61. Nishi Y, Sasaki K, Miyatake T. Biogenic amines, caffeine and tonic im- mobility in Tribolium castaneum. J Insect Physiol. 2010;56:622-8.
  62. Andretic R, Kim YC, Jones FS, Han KA, Greenspan RJ. Drosophila D1 dopamine receptor mediates caffeine-induced arousal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:20392-7.
  63. Laurienti PJ, Field AS, Burdette JH, Maldjian JA, Yen YF, Moody DM. Relationship between caffeine-induced changes in resting cerebral perfusion and blood oxygenation level-dependent signal. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1607.
  64. Addicott MA, Laurienti PJ. A comparison of the effects of caffeine fol- lowing abstinence and normal caffeine use. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009;207:423-31.
  65. Sigmon SC, Herning RI, Better W, Cadet JL, Griffiths RR. Caffeine withdrawal, acute effects, tolerance, and absence of net beneficial ef- fects of chronic administration: cerebral blood flow velocity, quantita- tive EEG, and subjective effects. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009; 204:573-85.
  66. Hewlett P, Smith A. Acute effects of caffeine in volunteers with differ- ent patterns of regular consumption. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2006; 21:167-80.
  67. Reissig CJ, Strain EC, Griffiths RR. Caffeinated energy drinks: a grow- ing problem. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;99:1-10.
  68. Haskell CF, Kennedy DO, Wesnes KA, Milne AL, Scholey AB. A dou- ble-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-dose evaluation of the acute be- havioural effects of guaraná in humans. J Psychopharmacol. 2007; 21:65.
  69. Di Matteo V, Pierucci M, Di Giovanni G, Benigno A, Esposito E. The neurobiological bases for the pharmacotherapy of nicotine addiction. Curr Pharm Des. 2007;13:1269-84.
  70. Poorthuis RB, Goriounova NA, Couey JJ, Mansvelder HD. Nicotinic actions on neuronal networks for cognition: general principles and long-term consequences. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;78:668-76.
  71. Mansvelder HD, van Aerde KI, Couey JJ, Brussaard AB. Nicotinic modulation of neuronal networks: from receptors to cognition. Psy- chopharmacology (Berl). 2006;184:292-305.
  72. Heishman SJ, Kleykamp BA, Singleton EG. Meta-analysis of the acute effects of nicotine and smoking on human performance. Psychophar- macology (Berl). 2010;210:453-69.
  73. Levin ED, Conners CK, Silva D, Hinton SC, Meck WH, March J, Rose JE. Transdermal nicotine effects on attention. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1998;140:135-41.
  74. Lozano VC, Armengaud C, Gauthier M. Memory impairment in- duced by cholinergic antagonists injected into the mushroom bodies of the honeybee. J Comp Physiol A. 2001;187:249-254.
  75. Cano Lozano V, Gauthier M. Effects of the muscarinic antagonists at- ropine and pirenzepine on olfactory conditioning in the honeybee. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1998;59:903-7.
  76. Carnicella S, Pain L, Oberling P. Cholinergic effects on fear condition- ing II: nicotinic and muscarinic modulations of atropine-induced dis- ruption of the degraded contingency effect. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005;178:533-41.
  77. Bartus RT, Dean RL. Pharmaceutical treatment for cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative conditions: explor- ing new territory using traditional tools and established maps. Psy- chopharmacology (Berl). 2009;202:15-36.
  78. Kucharski R, Maleszka R. Microarray and real-time PCR analyses of gene expression in the honeybee brain following caffeine treatment. J Mol Neurosci. 2005;27:269-76.
  79. Heberlein U, Tsai LTY, Kapfhamer D, Lasek AW. Drosophila, a genetic model system to study cocaine-related behaviors: a review with focus on LIM-only proteins. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:97-106.
  80. McClung C, Hirsh J. Stereotypic behavioral responses to free-base co- caine and the development of behavioral sensitization in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 1998;8:109-12.
  81. Barron AB, Maleszka R, Helliwell PG, Robinson GE. Effects of cocaine on honey bee dance behaviour. J Exp Biol. 2009;212:163-8.
  82. Andretic R, van Swinderen B, Greenspan RJ. Dopaminergic modula- tion of arousal in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2005;15:1165-75.
  83. Caveney S, Charlet DA, Freitag H, Maier-Stolte M, Starratt AN. New observations on the secondary chemistry of World Ephedra (Ephedra- ceae). Am J Bot. 2001;88:1199-208.
  84. Gritsai OB, Dubynin VA, Pilipenko VE, Petrov OP. Effects of peptide and non-peptide opioids on protective reaction of the cockroach Per- iplaneta americana in the "hot camera". J Evol Biochem Physiol. 2004; 40:153-60.
  85. Dyakonova VE. Role of opioid peptides in behavior of invertebrates. J Evol Biochem Physiol. 2001;37:335-47.
  86. Tan J, Galligan JJ, Hollingworth RM. Agonist actions of neonicoti- noids on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed by cockroach neurons. Neurotoxicology. 2007;28:829-42.
  87. Bainton RJ, Tsai LT, Singh CM, Moore MS, Neckameyer WS, Heberlein U. Dopamine modulates acute responses to cocaine, nico- tine and ethanol in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2000;10:187-94.
  88. van den Beukel I, van Kleef R, Oortgiesen M. Differential effects of physostigmine and organophosphates on nicotinic receptors in neuro- nal cells of different species. Neurotoxicology. 1998;19:777-87.
  89. Militante J, Ma BW, Akk G, Steinbach JH. Activation and block of the adult muscle-type nicotinic receptor by physostigmine: single-channel studies. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;74:764-76.
  90. Prediger RDS, De-Mello N, Takahashi RN. Pilocarpine improves ol- factory discrimination and social recognition memory deficits in 24 month-old rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;531:176-82. 100. Rupniak NMJ, Steventon MJ, Field MJ, Jennings CA, Iversen SD. Comparison of the effects of 4 cholinomimetic agents on cognition in primates following disruption by scopolamine or by lists of objects. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989;99:189-95. 101. Ebert U, Kirch W. Review: scopolamine model of dementia: electroen- cephalogram findings and cognitive performance. Eur J Clin Invest. 1998;28:944-9. 102. Rohmer M. The discovery of a mevalonate-independent pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria, algae and higher plants. Nat Prod Rep. 1999;16:565-74. 103. de Almeida LFR, Frei F, Mancini E, De Martino L, De Feo V. Phyto- toxic activities of Mediterranean essential oils. Molecules. 2010;15: 4309-23. 104. De Martino L, Mancini E, de Almeida LFR, De Feo V. The antigermi- native activity of twenty-seven monoterpenes. Molecules. 2010;15: 6630-7. 105. Céspedes CL, Salazar JR, Martínez M, Aranda E. Insect growth regu- latory effects of some extracts and sterols from Myrtillocactus geome- trizans (Cactaceae) against Spodoptera frugiperda and Tenebrio molitor. Phytochemistry. 2005;66:2481-93. 106.
  91. Moulton PL, Boyko LN, Fitzpatrick JL, Petros TV. The effect of Ginkgo biloba on memory in healthy male volunteers. Physiol Behav. 2001;73:659-65. 133. Birks JG, Grimley E, Van Dongen M. Ginkgo biloba for cognitive im- pairment and dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;CD003120. 134. Birks J, Evans JG. Ginkgo biloba for cognitive impairment and de- mentia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009:CD003120. 135. Kaschel R. Ginkgo biloba: specificity of neuropsychological improvement- a selective review in search of differential effects. Human Psychophar- macol. 2009;24:345-70. 136. Kennedy DO, Scholey AB. The psychopharmacology of European herbs with cognition-enhancing properties. Curr Pharm Des. 2006; 12:4613-23. 137. Tittel G, Wagner H, Bos R. Chemical-composition of the essential oil from melissa. Planta Med. 1982;46:91-8. 138. Ntalli NG, Ferrari F, Giannakou I, Menkissoglu-Spiroudi U. Phyto- chemistry and nematicidal activity of the essential oils from 8 greek lamiaceae aromatic plants and 13 terpene components. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:7856-63. 139. Koliopoulos G, Pitarokili D, Kioulos E, Michaelakis A, Tzakou O. Chemical composition and larvicidal evaluation of Mentha, Salvia, and Melissa essential oils against the West Nile virus mosquito Culex pipiens. Parasitol Res. 2010;107:327-35. 140. Pereira RP, Fachinetto R, de Souza Prestes A, Puntel R, Santos da Silva G, Heinzmann B, Boschetti T, Athayde M, Bürger M, et al. Antioxidant Plant secondary metabolites and brain function 45 effects of different extracts from Melissa officinalis, Matricaria recutita and Cymbopogon citratus. Neurochem Res. 2009;34:973-83. 141. Ferreira A, Proença C, Serralheiro MLM, Araújo MEM. The in vitro screening for acetylcholinesterase inhibition and antioxidant activity of medicinal plants from Portugal. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2006;108:31-7. 142. Perry N, Court G, Bidet N, Court J, Perry E. European herbs with cholinergic activities: potential in dementia therapy. Int J Geriatr Psy- chiatry. 1996;11:1063-9. 143. Wake G, Court J, Pickering A, Lewis R, Wilkins R, Perry E. CNS ace- tylcholine receptor activity in European medicinal plants tradition- ally used to improve failing memory. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;69: 105-14. 144. Dastmalchi K, Ollilainen V, Lackman P, Gennäs GBA, Dorman HJD, Järvinen PP, Yli-Kauhaluoma J, Hiltunen R. Acetylcholinesterase in- hibitory guided fractionation of Melissa officinalis L. Bioorg Med Chem. 2009;17:867-71. 145. Salah SM, Jäger AK. Screening of traditionally used Lebanese herbs for neurological activities. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;97:145-9. 146. Awad R, Muhammad A, Durst T, Trudeau VL, Arnason JT. Bioassay- guided fractionation of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) using an in vitro measure of GABA transaminase activity. Phytother Res. 2009;23: 1075-81. 147.
  92. Khom S, Baburin I, Timin E, Hohaus A, Trauner G, Kopp B, Hering S. Valerenic acid potentiates and inhibits GABAA receptors: molecular mechanism and subunit specificity. Neuropharmacology. 2007;53:178-87. 185. Lacher SK, Mayer R, Sichardt K, Nieber K, Müller CE. Interaction of valerian extracts of different polarity with adenosine receptors: iden- tification of isovaltrate as an inverse agonist at A1 receptors. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;73:248-58. 186. Murphy K, Kubin ZJ, Shepherd JN, Ettinger RH. Valeriana officinalis root extracts have potent anxiolytic effects in laboratory rats. Phyto- medicine. 2010;17:674-8. 187. Benke D, Barberis A, Kopp S, Altmann KH, Schubiger M, Vogt KE, Rudolph U, Mohler H. GABA(A) receptors as in vivo substrate for the anxiolytic action of valerenic acid, a major constituent of valerian root extracts. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56:174-81. 188. Gerhard U, Linnenbrink N, Georghiadou C, Hobi V. Vigilanzmindernde Effekte zweier pflanzlicher Schlafmittel [Vigilance-decreasing effects of 2 plant-derived sedatives]. Revue Suisse Medecine Praxis 1996;85. 189.
  93. Weinreb O, Mandel S, Amit T, Youdim MBH. Neurological mecha- nisms of green tea polyphenols in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's dis- eases. J Nutr Biochem. 2004;15:506-16. 255. Di Carlo G, Borrelli F, Ernst E, Izzo A. St John's wort: Prozac from the plant kingdom. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001;22:292-7. 256. Beerhues L. Hyperforin. Phytochemistry. 2006;67:2201-7. 257. Meruelo D, Lavie G, Lavie D. Therapeutic agents with dramatic anti- retroviral activity and little toxicity at effective doses: aromatic polycy- clic diones hypericin and pseudohypericin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:5230. 258. Zanoli P. Role of hyperforin in the pharmacological activities of St. John's Wort. CNS Drug Rev. 2004;10:203-18. 259. Medina MA, Martínez-Poveda B, Amores-Sánchez MI, Quesada AR. Hyperforin: more than an antidepressant bioactive compound? Life Sci. 2006;79:105-11. 260. Butterweck V, Jurgenliemk G, Nahrstedt A, Winterhoff H. Flavonoids from Hypericum perforatum show antidepressant activity in the forced swimming test. Planta Med. 2000;66:3-6. 261. Butterweck V, Schmidt M. St. John's wort: role of active compounds for its mechanism of action and efficacy. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2007;157:356-61. 262. Filippini R, Piovan A, Borsarini A, Caniato R. Study of dynamic accu- mulation of secondary metabolites in three subspecies of Hypericum perforatum. Fitoterapia. 2010;81:115-9. 263. Sirvent T, Gibson D. Induction of hypericins and hyperforin in Hy- pericum perforatum L. in response to biotic and chemical elicitors* 1. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2002;60:311-20. 264. Xu MJ, Dong JF, Zhu MY. Nitric oxide mediates the fungal elicitor- induced hypericin production of Hypericum perforatum cell suspen- sion cultures through a jasmonic-acid-dependent signal pathway. Plant Physiol. 2005;139:991. 265. Knox J, Dodge A. Isolation and activity of the photodynamic pigment hypericin. Plant Cell Environ. 1985;8:19-25. 266. Butterweck V. Mechanism of action of St John's wort in depression: what is known? CNS Drugs. 2003;17:539-62. 267. Kumar V, Mdzinarishvili A, Kiewert C, Abbruscato T, Bickel U, Schyf C, Klein J. NMDA receptor-antagonistic properties of hyperforin, a constituent of St. John's Wort. J Pharmacol Sci. 2006;102:47-54. 268.
  94. Docherty J, Fu M, Stiffler B, Limperos R, Pokabla C, DeLucia A. Re- sveratrol inhibition of herpes simplex virus replication. Antiviral Res. 1999;43:135-45. 274. Faith SA, Sweet TJ, Bailey E, Booth T, Docherty JJ. Resveratrol sup- presses nuclear factor-[kappa] B in herpes simplex virus infected cells. Antiviral Res. 2006;72:242-51. 275. Baur JA, Pearson KJ, Price NL, Jamieson HA, Lerin C, Kalra A, Prabhu VV, Allard JS, Lopez-Lluch G, et al. Resveratrol improves health and survival of mice on a high-calorie diet. Nature. 2006;444:337-42. 276. Udenigwe CC, Ramprasath VR, Aluko RE, Jones PJH. Potential of re- sveratrol in anticancer and anti-inflammatory therapy. Nutr Rev. 2008;66:445-54. 277. Nijveldt RJ, van Nood E, van Hoorn DEC, Boelens PG, van Norren K, van Leeuwen PAM. Flavonoids: a review of probable mechanisms of action and potential applications. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74:418-25. 278. Soleas GJ, Diamandis EP, Goldberg DM. Resveratrol: a molecule whose time has come? And gone? Clin Biochem. 1997;30:91-113. 279. Saiko P, Szakmary A, Jaeger W, Szekeres T. Resveratrol and its analogs: defense against cancer, coronary disease and neurodegenerative mala- dies or just a fad? Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2008;658:68-94. 280. Fan E, Zhang LJ, Jiang S, Bai YH. Beneficial effects of resveratrol on atherosclerosis. J Med Food. 2008;11:610-4. 281. Kopp P. Resveratrol, a phytoestrogen found in red wine. A possible ex- planation for the conundrum of the 'French paradox'? Eur J Endocri- nol. 1998;138:619-20. 282. Anekonda T. S. Resveratrol-A boon for treating Alzheimer's disease? Brain Research Reviews. 2006;52:316-26. 283. Chen CK, Pace-Asciak CR. Vasorelaxing activity of resveratrol and quercetin in isolated rat aorta. Gen Pharmacol. 1996;27:363-6. 284. Gojkovic-Bukarica L, Novakovic A, Kanjuh V, Bumbasirevic M, Lesic A, Heinle H. A role of ion channels in the endothelium-independent relaxation of rat mesenteric artery induced by resveratrol. J Pharmacol Sci. 2008;108:124-30. 285. Novakovic A, Bukarica LG, Kanjuh V, Heinle H. Potassium channels- mediated vasorelaxation of rat aorta induced by resveratrol. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006b;99:360-4. 286.
  95. Bryant M, Cassidy A, Hill C, Powell J, Talbot D, Dye L. Effect of con- sumption of soy isoflavones on behavioural, somatic and affective Plant secondary metabolites and brain function 49 symptoms in women with premenstrual syndrome. Br J Nutr. 2005; 93:731-9. 311. Basaria S, Wisniewski A, Dupree K, Bruno T, Song MY, Yao F, Ojumu A, John M, Dobs AS. Effect of high-dose isoflavones on cognition, quality of life, androgens, and lipoprotein in post-menopausal women. J Endocrinol Invest. 2009;32:150-5. 312. Hooper L, Ryder JJ, Kurzer MS, Lampe JW, Messina MJ, Phipps WR, Cassidy A. Effects of soy protein and isoflavones on circulating hor- mone concentrations in pre-and post-menopausal women: a system- atic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:423-40. 313. Casini M, Marelli G, Papaleo E, Ferrari A, D'Ambrosio F, Unfer V. Psychological assessment of the effects of treatment with phytoestro- gens on postmenopausal women: a randomized, double-blind, cross- over, placebo-controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:972-8. 314. File S, Hartley D, Elsabagh S, Duffy R, Wiseman H. Cognitive im- provement after 6 weeks of soy supplements in postmenopausal women is limited to frontal lobe function. Menopause. 2005;12:193. 315. Zhao L, Brinton RD. WHI and WHIMS follow-up and human studies of soy isoflavones on cognition. Expert Rev Neurother. 2007;7:1549-64. 316. Thorp A, Sinn N, Buckley J, Coates A, Howe P. Soya isoflavone sup- plementation enhances spatial working memory in men. Br J Nutr. 2009;102:1348-54. 317. Pauling L. Evolution and the need for ascorbic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1970;67:1643. 318. Benzie IFF. Evolution of dietary antioxidants. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Int Physiol. 2003;136:113-126. 319. Bhat KPL, Kosmeder JW, Pezzuto JM. Biological effects of resveratrol. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2001;3:1041-1064. 320. Baur JA, Sinclair DA. Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: the in vivo evidence. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:493-506. 321. Samuelsson G. Drugs of natural origin: a textbook of pharmacognosy. Stockholm: 5th Swedish Pharmaceutical Press; 2004. 322. Humphrey AJ, Beale MH. Terpenes. In: Crozier A, Clifford MH, Ashihara H, editors. Plant secondary metabolites: occurence, structure and role in the human diet. Oxford: Blackwell Publish- ing; 2006. 323. Singh M, Arseneault M, Sanderson T, Murthy V, Ramassamy C. Chal- lenges for research on polyphenols from foods in Alzheimer's disease: bioavailability, metabolism, and cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56:4855-73. 324. Williamson EM. Synergy and other interactions in phytomedicines. Phytomedicine. 2001;8:401-9. 325. Spinella M. The importance of pharmacological synergy in psychoac- tive herbal medicines. Altern Med Rev. 2002;7:130-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kennedy, D. O., & Wightman, E. L.
Affiliations
Northumbria University (GB)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, David O.
Venue
Advances in Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
32-50
ISSN
  • 2156-5376 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-8313
OpenAlex
W2158258935
Cited by
684
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
Keywords
plant secondary metabolites, phytochemicals, nootropic drugs, brain function, central nervous system, alkaloids, caffeine, nicotine, terpenes, Ginkgo biloba, ginseng, Valeriana officinalis, lemon balm, sage, phenolic compounds, curcumin, resveratrol, epigallocatechin gallate, Hypericum perforatum, soy isoflavones, psychoactive plants, natural product drug discovery
MeSH terms
Animals, Antioxidants, Brain, Flavonoids, Panax, Humans, Insecta, Phytotherapy, Phenols, Plant Extracts, Plants, Plant Physiological Phenomena, Ginkgo biloba, Salvia officinalis, Melissa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review