Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phylogeography and species limits in the Gymnodactylus darwinii complex (Gekkonidae, Squamata): genetic structure coincides with river systems in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF THE GYMNODACTYLUS DARWINII COMPLEX (GEKKONIDAE, SQUAMATA)

PELLEGRINO, KATIA C. M., RODRIGUES, MIGUEL T., WAITE, AARON N., MORANDO, MARIANA, YASSUDA, YATIYO Y., SITES, JACK W.·2005·Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Abstract

Phylogenetic analyses based on mtDNA cytochrome b were performed in 42 lizards of the Gymnodactylus darwinii complex from three regions within Brazil's Atlantic Forest. Mainland regions and continental shelf islands in the south-eastern range and mainland areas from the north-east were sampled. The criteria of maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian methods were explored, with the robustness for nodes assessed by bootstrapping (MP and ML) and posterior probabilities (Bayesian searches). By all methods, three distinctive phylogroups were recovered: a south-eastern clade (SE) and two clades from northern regions (NE1 and NE2). The pattern of genetic structure of the major clades coincided with the presence of river systems in the Atlantic Forest, and based on corrected genetic distances between those clades, divergence times were tentatively estimated using mtDNA rates calibrated for squamate reptiles. The putative role of Atlantic Forest rivers in generating differentiation is discussed. We present a hypothesis of species limits for G. darwinii, based on concordant lines of evidence including cytogenetic and mtDNA analyses. Two chromosome races (cytotype A, 2n = 38; and cytotype B, 2n = 40) had distributions concordant with clades SE and NE1 + NE2, respectively. These races are interpreted to be full species on the basis of a number of empirical criteria. © 2005 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 85, 13–26.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00472.x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
PELLEGRINO, K. C. M., RODRIGUES, M. T., WAITE, A. N., MORANDO, M., YASSUDA, Y. Y., & SITES, J. W.
Venue
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Published
2005-04-25
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
13-26
ISSN
  • 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8312
OpenAlex
W2157212050
Cited by
264
References
43
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogeography and species limits in the Gymnodactylus darwinii complex (Gekkonidae, Squamata): genetic structure coincides with river systems in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF THE GYMNODACTYLUS DARWINII COMPLEX (GEKKONIDAE, SQUAMATA). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00472.x
The paper
PELLEGRINO, K. C. M., RODRIGUES, M. T., WAITE, A. N., MORANDO, M., YASSUDA, Y. Y., & SITES, J. W. (2005). Phylogeography and species limits in the Gymnodactylus darwinii complex (Gekkonidae, Squamata): genetic structure coincides with river systems in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF THE GYMNODACTYLUS DARWINII COMPLEX (GEKKONIDAE, SQUAMATA). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00472.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.