The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical Tests of Neutrality of Mutations Against Population Growth, Hitchhiking and Background Selection
Open accessAbstract
The main purpose of this article is to present several new statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against a class of alternative models, under which DNA polymorphisms tend to exhibit excesses of rare alleles or young mutations. Another purpose is to study the powers of existing and newly developed tests and to examine the detailed pattern of polymorphisms under population growth, genetic hitchhiking and background selection. It is found that the polymorphic patterns in a DNA sample under logistic population growth and genetic hitchhiking are very similar and that one of the newly developed tests, FS, is considerably more powerful than existing tests for rejecting the hypothesis of neutrality of mutations. Background selection gives rise to quite different polymorphic patterns than does logistic population growth or genetic hitchhiking, although all of them show excesses of rare alleles or young mutations. We show that Fu and Li's tests are among the most powerful tests against background selection. Implications of these results are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hitchhiking Under Positive Darwinian Selection
Fay, J. C., & Wu, C.-I. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.3.1405 · Cited by 1,819
Molecular Signatures of Natural Selection
Nielsen, R. (2005) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112420 · Cited by 1,641
Genetic Evidence for an East Asian Origin of Domestic Dogs
Savolainen, P., Zhang, Y.-P., Luo, J., Lundeberg, J., & Leitner, T. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1073906 · Cited by 960
PopGenome: An Efficient Swiss Army Knife for Population Genomic Analyses in R
Pfeifer, B., Wittelsbürger, U., Ramos-Onsins, S. E., & Lercher, M. J. (2014) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msu136 · Cited by 939
Detecting Natural Selection in Genomic Data
Vitti, J. J., Grossman, S. R., & Sabeti, P. C. (2013) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133526 · Cited by 694
Metadata
- Authors
- Fu, Y.-X.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 915-925
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2100444509
- Cited by
- 7,164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Tests of Neutrality of Mutations Against Population Growth, Hitchhiking and Background Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/147.2.915
- The paper
- Fu, Y.-X. (1997). Statistical Tests of Neutrality of Mutations Against Population Growth, Hitchhiking and Background Selection. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/147.2.915
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.