The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The phenolic constituents of plants and their taxonomic significance: II. Monocotyledons
Abstract
The phenolic constituents of the monocotyledons are generally similar to those of the dicotyledons. Ellagic acid is, however, absent and the other ‘regular’ trihydroxy-substituted constituents myricetin and leucodelphinidin are only rarely present. Leucocyanidin is also relatively uncommon. The tendency evident in the dicotyledons for leuco-anthocyanins and flavonols to be less frequently, and navones and methoxy-substituted aromatic acids to be more frequently present in herbaceous than in woody plants is supported by the present data. Glycoflavones, i.e. navones carbon-carbon substituted with glycosyl residues, occur more frequently than in the dicotyledons, especially in the Gramineae, Iridaceae and Liliaceae. In the Iridaceae the glycoxanthone mangiferin is also frequently present. In the last family, the genera Crocus and Iris have been examined in detail. In Iris, where there is considerable morphological diversity, the chemical data support the recognized division of the genus on morphological grounds. In Crocus, where the division of the genus is less clear-cut, there is corresponding difficulty in ascertaining distinctions on chemical grounds. The bearing of the chemical evidence on possible phylogenetio relationships within the monocotyledons, and as between the monocotyledons and the dicotyledons is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative biochemistry of the flavonoids
Harborne, J. B. (1967) · Cited by 1,167
The phenolic constituents of plants and their taxonomic significance. I. Dicotyledons
BATE-SMITH, E. C. (1962) · Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Botany · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1962.tb00890.x · Cited by 525
Self-citationGreenman, J. M. (1913) · Botanical Gazette · doi:10.1086/331112 · Cited by 436
Harborne, J. B. (1965) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(00)86152-x · Cited by 251
Hegnauer, R. (1963) · Birkhäuser Basel eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-9387-9 · Cited by 173
Harborne, J. B., & Hall, E. (1964) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(00)83627-4 · Cited by 78
New Leuco-anthocyanins in Grasses
Bate-Smith, E. C., & Swain, T. (1967) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2131033a0 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
Cited by
Autofluorescence of atmospheric bioaerosols: spectral fingerprints and taxonomic trends of pollen
Pöhlker, C., Huffman, J. A., Förster, J.-D., & Pöschl, U. (2013) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-6-3369-2013 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- BATE-SMITH, E. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1968-02
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 383
- Pages
- 325-356
- ISSN
- 0368-2927 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1532033905
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 21.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The phenolic constituents of plants and their taxonomic significance: II. Monocotyledons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1968.tb00094.x
- The paper
- BATE-SMITH, E. C. (1968). The phenolic constituents of plants and their taxonomic significance: II. Monocotyledons. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Botany. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1968.tb00094.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.