Cited by 49Marine and fisheries researchCoral and Marine Ecosystems StudiesIchthyology and Marine Biology

Impact of variable pelagic environments on natural larval growth and recruitment of the reef fish Thalassoma bifasciatum

Sponaugle, S., Pinkard, D. R.·2004·Journal of Fish Biology

Abstract

New recruits of the bluehead wrasse Thalassoma bifasciatum were censused and collected from nearshore reefs of Barbados, West Indies, every 2 weeks for 20 months. Their temporal coincidence with low salinity (<34·5) water during their pelagic larval stage was determined by comparing the otolith records of new recruits with conductivity and temperature records from a current meter moored 2 km off the west coast of the island. Larval residence in a low salinity North Brazil Current (NBC) ring appeared to have a negative impact on growth. Larvae that encountered a NBC ring for at least 7 days during either the first half of the larval period exhibited slower larval growth than those that did not encounter a ring for 7 days during any part of their larval period. As a result of this slower growth, larvae that encountered low salinity waters had a longer pelagic larval duration and were larger at the time of settlement. The magnitude of settlement was not distinctly related to the presence or absence of a NBC ring, but the largest settlement event occurred at the end of the longest ring event. Early juvenile growth did not vary between fish that had encountered a ring and those that did not, so size differences at settlement were propagated through the first week of life on the reef. The potentially opposing attributes of fast and slow‐growing larvae (e.g. fast growing larvae with shorter larval stage duration but smaller size at settlement and higher susceptibility to reef predat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2004.00279.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Larval encounter with particular water masses significantly influences larval growth and subsequent juvenile condition through carry-over processes.

    “Similarly, larval encounter with particular water masses significantly influences larval growth (4) and subsequent juvenile condition through carry-over processes (26).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sponaugle, S., & Pinkard, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Sponaugle, S.
Venue
Journal of Fish Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
34-54
ISSN
  • 0022-1112 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8649
OpenAlex
W2043384236
Cited by
49
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Fish Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Keywords
Thalassoma bifasciatum, bluehead wrasse, larval growth, larval recruitment, North Brazil Current, low salinity water, pelagic larval duration, settlement, juvenile growth, life-history trade-offs, larval retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review