The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct Observation and Analysis of Indentation Cracking in Glasses and Ceramics
Abstract
A review of the observations of indentation‐induced fracture suggests that there is no simple generalization which may be made concerning crack initiation sequences. Here, we investigate the material dependence of the initiation sequence of indentation cracks (cone, radial, median, half‐penny, and lateral) using an inverted tester allowing simultaneous viewing of the fracture process and measurement of the indeter load and displacement during contact. Two normal glasses, two anomalous glasses, and seven crystalline materials are examined. Key results include (i) direct evidence that the surface traces of cracks observed at indentation contacts are those of radial cracks, rather than median‐nucleated half‐penny cracks (at least for peak contact loads <40 N) and (ii) that, in crystalline materials, radial cracks form almost immediately on loading of the indenter, in anomalous glasses at somewhat greater loads, but in normal glasses during unloading. A detailed consideration of the stress fields arising during indentation contact predicts material‐dependent initiation sequences, in agreement with observations, particularly those of radial crack formation on loading for materials with large modulus‐to‐hardness ratios. In addition, a new, unexplored crack system is demonstrated, the shallow lateral cracks, which appear to be responsible for material removal at sharp contacts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
VI. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids
Griffith, A. A. (1921) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rsta.1921.0006 · Cited by 11,052
Cited by
Indentation of Ceramics with Spheres: A Century after Hertz
Lawn, B. R. (1998) · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02580.x · Cited by 734
Photovoltaic module performance and durability following long-term field exposure
King, D. L., Quintana, M. A., Kratochvil, J. A., Ellibee, D. E., & Hansen, B. R. (2000) · Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-159x(200003/04)8:2<241::aid-pip290>3.0.co;2-d · Cited by 263
Chu, B. T. T., Tobias, G., Salzmann, C. G., Ballesteros, B., Grobert, N., Todd, R. I., & Green, M. L. H. (2008) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b809369e · Cited by 69
Qian, H., Chen, M., Qi, Z., Teng, Q., Qi, H., Zhang, L., & Shan, X. (2023) · Crystals · doi:10.3390/cryst13030428 · Cited by 33
Kruzic, J. J., & Ritchie, R. O. (2008) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.01.022 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook, R. F., & Pharr, G. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Ceramic Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-04
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 787-817
- ISSN
- 0002-7820 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-2916
- OpenAlex
- W2153396730
- Cited by
- 1,071
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct Observation and Analysis of Indentation Cracking in Glasses and Ceramics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05119.x
- The paper
- Cook, R. F., & Pharr, G. M. (1990). Direct Observation and Analysis of Indentation Cracking in Glasses and Ceramics. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05119.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.