Cited by 69Carbon Nanotubes in CompositesGlass properties and applicationsAdvanced ceramic materials synthesis

Fabrication of carbon-nanotube-reinforced glass–ceramic nanocomposites by ultrasonic in situ sol–gel processing

Chu, Bryan T. T., Tobias, Gerard, Salzmann, Christoph G., Ballesteros, Belén, Grobert, Nicole, Todd, Richard I., Green, Malcolm L. H.·2008·Journal of Materials Chemistry

Abstract

The addition of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to ceramic or glass matrices has the potential to provide composites with novel properties but composites with a uniform dispersion of undamaged CNTs have proved difficult to make. This paper reports a processing method that overcomes these problems by using a powderless sol–gel route to produce a low-melting point aluminoborosilicate glass matrix, in combination with a dispersion method for the CNTs that is compatible with the sol. Single-walled or multi-walled CNTs were first functionalized by treatment with nitric acid followed by an ammonia–ethanol solution and were then dispersed in a glass precursor sol via ultrasonic processing. After gelation and calcination, the powder was hot pressed to make dense, well dispersed CNT–borosilicate glass composites with CNT contents from 0.5 to 5 wt%. Raman spectroscopy showed that the CNTs had suffered little damage during processing. The formation of cristobalite initially lead to microcracking but this was successfully suppressed by further additions of alumina. The CNTs suppressed cracking around hardness indentations and substantial crack bridging by the CNTs was observed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b809369e

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The modified wood possesses improved thermal and mechanical properties and dimensional stability with increasing load of inorganic TiO2 gels, as ultrasonic treatment facilitates chemical reactions between liquid and solid phases.

    “The modified wood possesses improved the thermal and mechanical properties and dimensional stability with increasing load of inorganic TiO 2 gels, as ultrasonic treatment facilitates chemical reactions between liquid and solid phases 88,89”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Chu, B. T. T., Tobias, G., Salzmann, C. G., Ballesteros, B., Grobert, N., Todd, R. I., & Green, M. L. H.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Todd, Richard I.
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry
Published
2008
Volume
18
Issue
44
Pages
5344
ISSN
  • 0959-9428 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-5501
OpenAlex
W1989162131
Cited by
69
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Materials Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • European Commission
  • Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Glass properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Ceramics and Composites › Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
Keywords
carbon nanotubes, sol-gel synthesis, sonication, aluminoborosilicate glass, CNT dispersion, nitric acid functionalization, hot pressing, cristobalite formation, crack bridging, indentation cracking, alumina addition, single-walled carbon nanotubes, multi-walled carbon nanotubes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review