Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of dermatological disorders in Japan: A nationwide, cross‐sectional, seasonal, multicenter, hospital‐based study

FURUE, Masutaka, YAMAZAKI, Souji, JIMBOW, Koichi, TSUCHIDA, Tetsuya, AMAGAI, Masayuki, TANAKA, Toshihiro, MATSUNAGA, Kayoko, MUTO, Masahiko, MORITA, Eishin, AKIYAMA, Masashi, SOMA, Yoshinao, TERUI, Tadashi, MANABE, Motomu·2011·The Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

To clarify the prevalence of skin disorders among dermatology patients in Japan, a nationwide, cross‐sectional, seasonal, multicenter study was conducted in 69 university hospitals, 45 district‐based pivotal hospitals, and 56 private clinics (170 clinics in total). In each clinic, information was collected on the diagnosis, age, and gender of all outpatients and inpatients who visited the clinic on any one day of the second week in each of May, August, and November 2007 and February 2008. Among 67 448 cases, the top twenty skin disorders were, in descending order of incidence, miscellaneous eczema, atopic dermatitis, tinea pedis, urticaria/angioedema, tinea unguium, viral warts, psoriasis, contact dermatitis, acne, seborrheic dermatitis, hand eczema, miscellaneous benign skin tumors, alopecia areata, herpes zoster/postherpetic neuralgia, skin ulcers (nondiabetic), prurigo, epidermal cysts, vitiligo vulgaris, seborrheic keratosis, and drug eruption/toxicoderma. Atopic dermatitis, impetigo, molluscum, warts, acne, and miscellaneous eczema shared their top‐ranking position in the pediatric population, whereas the most common disorders among the geriatric population were tinea pedis, tinea unguium, psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis, and miscellaneous eczema. For some disorders, such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria/angioedema, prurigo, insect bites, and tinea pedis, the number of patients correlated with the average high and low monthly temperatures. Males showed a greater susceptibility to some diseases (psoriasis, erythroderma, diabetic dermatoses, inter alia), whereas females were more susceptible to others (erythema nodosum, collagen diseases, livedo reticularis/racemosa, hand eczema, inter alia). In conclusion, this hospital‐based study highlights the present situation regarding dermatological patients in the early 21st century in Japan.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2011.01209.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
FURUE, M., YAMAZAKI, S., JIMBOW, K., TSUCHIDA, T., AMAGAI, M., TANAKA, T., MATSUNAGA, K., MUTO, M., MORITA, E., AKIYAMA, M., SOMA, Y., TERUI, T., & MANABE, M.
Venue
The Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-22
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
310-320
ISSN
  • 0385-2407 (ISSN-L)
  • 1346-8138
OpenAlex
W1527974626
Cited by
208
References
1
FWCI
9.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of dermatological disorders in Japan: A nationwide, cross‐sectional, seasonal, multicenter, hospital‐based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1346-8138.2011.01209.x
The paper
FURUE, M., YAMAZAKI, S., JIMBOW, K., TSUCHIDA, T., AMAGAI, M., TANAKA, T., MATSUNAGA, K., MUTO, M., MORITA, E., AKIYAMA, M., SOMA, Y., TERUI, T., & MANABE, M. (2011). Prevalence of dermatological disorders in Japan: A nationwide, cross‐sectional, seasonal, multicenter, hospital‐based study. The Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1346-8138.2011.01209.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.