Cited by 25Hair Growth and DisordersFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesDermatologic Treatments and Research

Efficacy and safety of bimatoprost 0.03% versus minoxidil 3% in enhancement of eyebrows: A randomized, double‐blind, split‐face comparative study

SUWANCHATCHAI, Warisorn, TANGLERTSAMPAN, Chuchai, PENGSALAE, Nopparat, MAKORNWATTANA, Manchima·2012·The Journal of Dermatology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2012.01579.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SUWANCHATCHAI, W., TANGLERTSAMPAN, C., PENGSALAE, N., & MAKORNWATTANA, M.
Affiliations
  • Mae Fah Luang University Hospital (TH)
  • Thammasat University (TH)
Corresponding author
TANGLERTSAMPAN, Chuchai
Venue
The Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-17
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
865-866
ISSN
  • 0385-2407 (ISSN-L)
  • 1346-8138
OpenAlex
W2102699836
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
bimatoprost, minoxidil, split-face comparison, hair growth agents
MeSH terms
Bimatoprost, Adult, Amides, Cloprostenol, Dermatitis, Contact, Double-Blind Method, Eyebrows, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Minoxidil, Vasodilator Agents, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review