Cited by 127Cancer Treatment and PharmacologyBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Predictive factors for response to docetaxel in human breast cancers

Open access
Noguchi, Shinzaburo·2006·Cancer Science

Abstract

Docetaxel has come into wide use recently for the treatment of breast cancer in neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic settings. Docetaxel binds to β‐tubulin and causes kinetic abnormalities in the dynamics of microtubules by increasing their polymerization and inhibiting their depolymerization, resulting in elevated levels of microtubule formation. During metaphase, defective spindle formation induced by docetaxel activates the mitotic checkpoint and leads to cell cycle arrest, culminating in apoptosis. However, docetaxel is not effective for all breast cancers. For example, in metastatic settings, the response rate to docetaxel reportedly ranges from 30 to 50%. It is therefore very important to develop a diagnostic method with high accuracy for the prediction of sensitivity to docetaxel in order to avoid unnecessary treatment. Currently it is impossible to identify, before the initiation of therapy, the patients for whom docetaxel will be effective. Various biological parameters have been studied clinically for their ability to predict response to docetaxel, such as parameters related to: (1) efflux (p‐glycoprotein) and metabolism (CYP3A4); (2) β‐tubulin (somatic mutation of β‐tubulin and changes in β‐tubulin isotypes levels); (3) cell cycle (HER2, BRCA1 and Aurora‐A); and (4) apoptosis (p53, BCL2 and thioredoxin). More recently, gene expression profiling techniques have been used for the development of a prediction model for response to docetaxel. In the present paper, clinical studies that have been conducted recently to identify predictive factors for response to docetaxel are reviewed together with a presentation of our recent work in this field. ( Cancer Sci 2006; 97: 813–820)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00265.x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noguchi, S.
Affiliations
The University of Osaka (JP)
Corresponding author
Noguchi, Shinzaburo
Venue
Cancer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-29
Volume
97
Issue
9
Pages
813-820
ISSN
  • 1347-9032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1349-7006
OpenAlex
W1981765582
Cited by
127
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
docetaxel, breast cancer, predictive biomarkers, drug response prediction, beta-tubulin mutations, P-glycoprotein, CYP3A4, HER2, BRCA1, AURKA, p53, Bcl-2, thioredoxin, gene expression profiling, microtubule dynamics, apoptosis
MeSH terms
Docetaxel, Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Biomarkers, Tumor, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Gene Expression Profiling, Taxoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review