Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular analysis of the pathophysiological binding of the platelet aggregation‐inducing factor podoplanin to the C‐type lectin‐like receptor CLEC‐2

Open access
Kato, Yukinari, Kaneko, Mika Kato, Kunita, Akiko, Ito, Hiromi, Kameyama, Akihiko, Ogasawara, Satoshi, Matsuura, Nana, Hasegawa, Yasushi, Suzuki‐Inoue, Katsue, Inoue, Osamu, Ozaki, Yukio, Narimatsu, Hisashi·2008·Cancer Science

Abstract

The mucin‐type sialoglycoprotein podoplanin (aggrus) is involved in tumor cell‐induced platelet aggregation and tumor metastasis. C‐type lectin‐like receptor‐2 (CLEC‐2) was recently identified as an endogenous receptor of podoplanin on platelets. However, the pathophysiological importance and function of CLEC‐2 have not been elucidated. Here we clarified the pathophysiological interaction between podoplanin and CLEC‐2 in vitro and in vivo. Using several deletion mutants of CLEC‐2 expressed as Fc chimeras, we first identified an important podoplanin‐recognition domain in CLEC‐2. Furthermore, the podoplanin–CLEC‐2 interaction was confirmed using several deletion mutants of podoplanin expressed as Fc chimeras. Not only the disialyl‐core1‐attached glycopeptide but also the stereostructure of the podoplanin protein was found to be critical for the CLEC‐2‐binding activity of podoplanin. We next synthesized various glycopeptides of podoplanin that included both the platelet aggregation‐stimulating domain and O‐glycan on Thr52. Interestingly, a disialyl‐core1‐attached glycopeptide was recognized specifically by CLEC‐2. Moreover, the anti‐podoplanin monoclonal antibody NZ‐1 suppressed both the podoplanin–CLEC‐2 interaction and podoplanin‐induced pulmonary metastasis, suggesting that CLEC‐2 is the first pathophysiological receptor of podoplanin to be identified. In summary, we clarified the molecular interaction in vitro and in vivo between a platelet aggregation‐inducing factor, podoplanin, and its specific pathophysiological receptor on platelets, CLEC‐2. Podoplanin and CLEC‐2 might represent promising therapeutic targets in cancer metastasis. (Cancer Sci 2008; 99: 54–61)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00634.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Kato, Y., Kaneko, M. K., Kunita, A., Ito, H., Kameyama, A., Ogasawara, S., Matsuura, N., Hasegawa, Y., Suzuki‐Inoue, K., Inoue, O., Ozaki, Y., & Narimatsu, H.
Venue
Cancer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10-18
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
54-61
ISSN
  • 1347-9032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1349-7006
OpenAlex
W2123857764
Cited by
285
References
18
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular analysis of the pathophysiological binding of the platelet aggregation‐inducing factor podoplanin to the C‐type lectin‐like receptor CLEC‐2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00634.x
The paper
Kato, Y., Kaneko, M. K., Kunita, A., Ito, H., Kameyama, A., Ogasawara, S., Matsuura, N., Hasegawa, Y., Suzuki‐Inoue, K., Inoue, O., Ozaki, Y., & Narimatsu, H. (2008). Molecular analysis of the pathophysiological binding of the platelet aggregation‐inducing factor podoplanin to the C‐type lectin‐like receptor CLEC‐2. Cancer Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00634.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.