The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Severity of Alcohol Dependence Questionnaire: Its Use, Reliability and Validity
Abstract
Summary: The clinical value of assessing degree of alcohol dependence is discussed in relation to goals of treatment. Further information is then provided on the use, reliability and validity of an instrument designed for this purpose ‐the SADQ. ‘Norms’ for SADQ scores from three samples of problem drinkers are given. Data indicating that individual items, sections and also the total scores of the SADQ have consistently high test‐retest reliability coefficients are presented. A study is described in which a degree of construct validity is established by relating SADQ scores to one important component of the alcohol dependence syndrome [2]‐narrowing of drinking repertoire. In addition, it is shown that SADQ scores have low, but significant, correlations with indicators of withdrawal severity for individuals treated at a Detoxification Unit. SADQ scores failed to correlate with indices of liver functioning. These results are discussed and it is concluded the SADQ is a quick, reliable and valid instrument.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alcohol dependence: Provisional description of a clinical syndrome
Edwards, G., & Gross, M. M. (1976) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.6017.1058 · Cited by 1,163
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1979.tb02415.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1979.tb01361.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1980.tb01379.x · DOI
- Heather N., 1981, 'Controlled Drinking'
- 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1980.tb02443.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1980.tb01380.x · DOI
- Polich J. M., 1980, The Course of Alcoholism Four Years after Treatment
- 10.1016/0005-7967(76)90087-5 · DOI
- Kalant H., 1971, Biological Basis of Alcholism
- 10.1016/0005-7967(79)90009-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0005-7967(82)90072-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/0005-7967(76)90007-3 · DOI
- Murphy D. J., Tiapride and Chlormethiazide in Alcohol Withdrawal: A Double Blind Trial
- Wodak A. D. Saunders J. B. Ewvsi‐Mensah I. Davis M.andWilliams R.(1982).Assessment of Alcohol Dependence in Patients with Alcoholic Liver Disease. Unpublished.
- Stockwell T. Smail P. Hodgson R.andCanter S.(1981).Do Alcoholics' Phobias Require Treatment?Paper presented at the Grand Canyon International Conference on Addictive Behaviours Arizona U.S.A.
- Edwards G., 1978, Alcoholism, Medicine and Psychiatry: New Knowledge and New Responses
- Bernadt M. W., A comparison of questionnaire and laboratory tests in the detection of excessive drinking and alcoholism, Lancet, 1, 325
Cited by
Prevalence and correlates of personality disorder in Great Britain
Coid, J., Yang, M., Tyrer, P., Roberts, A., & Ullrich, S. (2006) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.188.5.423 · Cited by 901
Bebbington, P. E., Bhugra, D., Brugha, T., Singleton, N., Farrell, M., Jenkins, R., Lewis, G., & Meltzer, H. (2004) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.185.3.220 · Cited by 562
Patient predictors of alcohol treatment outcome: A systematic review
Adamson, S. J., Sellman, J. D., & Frampton, C. M. A. (2009) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2008.05.007 · Cited by 370
Alcohol use disorders and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Roerecke, M., & Rehm, J. (2013) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.12231 · Cited by 326
Modeling psychopathology structure: a symptom-level analysis of Axis I and II disorders
Markon, K. E. (2010) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291709990183 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Stockwell, T., Murphy, D., & Hodgson, R.
- Venue
- British Journal of Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-06
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-155
- ISSN
- 0952-0481 (ISSN-L)
- 2056-5178
- OpenAlex
- W2055130717
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
