Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Alcohol Problem in America: From Temperance to Alcoholism

Levine, Harry Gene·1984·British Journal of Addiction

Abstract

Summary: This paper traces the ideology and politics of the ‘liquor problem’ in America from its invention or discovery at the end of the 18th century up to the present. In the 17th and 18th centuries alcohol was highly regarded, universally consumed, and even Puritans called it‘the Good Creature of God'. In the early 19th century, physicians and laymen developed and promulgated a new scientific and popular view of alcohol as an addicting, toxic, and dangerously unpredictable stimulant ‐ and they organized a mass movement to spread their ideas and to get people to give up drinking. Throughout the 19th century, temperance supporters regularly referred to alcohol addiction as a disease beyond the control of the will and engaged in reform and treatment efforts for habitual drunkards. They campaigned against alcohol because they believed it to be the cause of most of the major social problems in America. In short, they made alcohol a scape‐goat. The paper then discusses the passage and repeal of national Constitutional prohibition. They should be understood in the context of the new economic and political conditions of 20th century America ‐ especially the new power of the corporation, the decline of the old middle class, and the rapid growth of the industrial working class. The middle class supported prohibition as a panacea for many social problems, but the 18th Amendment's passage was achieved partly through the help of the corporate sector. Similarly, the repeal effort was led by the key elements of the corporate rich. Repeal was passed, and alcohol regulatory systems were designed and put into place, in the midst of the Great Depression ‐ in large part as a response to the political forces the Depression unleashed. Since the 1930s, concerns and policies about alcohol have focused on helping to aid the treatment and recovery of‘alcoholics'. The paper traces the development of Alcoholics Anonymous and the spread of its ideas about alcoholism and its organizational forms; it also briefly looks at new public health and social scientific ideas about ‘alcohol problems’ or ‘alcohol abuse'. The paper suggests that both alcoholism and public health conceptions have much more in common with 19th century temperance ideas than is usually thought. Indeed, nearly all present day ideas ‐ like addiction ‐ are derived from temperance ideas. Further, both 19th and 20th century forumulations have a tendency to blame drinking and individual behaviour for many problems which have much broader political and economic causes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1984.tb03845.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.15288/jsa.1978.39.143 · DOI
  2. Levine H. G., 1980, Alcohol and Drug Problems in Women
  3. Levine H. G., 1983, Alcohol and Disinhibition
  4. New York State Temperance Society, 1832, Third Annual Report of the New York Society for the Promotion of Intemperance
  5. Kobler J., 1973, Ardent Spirits: The Rise and Fall of Prohibition
  6. Krout J. A., 1925, The Origins of Prohibition
  7. Rorabaugh W. A., 1979, The Alcoholic Republic: An American Tradition
  8. Lender M. E., 1973, Drunkenness as an offense in Early New England: A Study of ‘Puritan’ Attitudes, Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 34, 353, 10.15288/qjsa.1973.34.353 · DOI
  9. Rush B., 1814, A New Deal in Liquor
  10. Wilkerson A. E., 1966, A History of the Concept of Alcoholism as a Disease
  11. Cassedy J. H., 1976, An Early American Hangover: The Medical Profession and Intemperance, 1790–1860, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 50, 405
  12. 10.2307/2090613 · DOI
  13. Clark N., 1976, Deliver Us From Evil: An Interpretation of American Prohibition
  14. 10.15288/jsa.1979.40.361 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1978.tb05805.x · DOI
  16. Epstein B. L., 1980, The Politics of Domesticity
  17. Odegard P., 1928, Pressure Politics: The Story of the Anti‐Saloon League
  18. Sinclair A., 1965, Era of Excess: A Social History of the Prohibition Movement
  19. 10.4159/harvard.9780674865495 · DOI
  20. Wiebe R. H., 1967, The Search for Order: 1877–1920
  21. Kolko G., 1963, The Triumph of Conservatism
  22. Levine H. G.(1983).The Committee of Fifty and the Origins of Alcohol Control.Journal of Drug Issues Winter. · DOI
  23. Gusfield J. R., 1968, Change and Continuity in Twentieth Century America
  24. 10.7312/warb93378 · DOI
  25. Mertz C., 1931, The Dry Decade
  26. Kyvig D. E., 1979, Repealing National Prohibition
  27. Dobyns F., 1940, The Amazing Story of Repeal
  28. Gordon E., 1943, The Wrecking of the Eighteenth Amendment
  29. Fosdick R, 1933, Toward Liquor Control
  30. Johnson B., 1973, The Alcoholism Movement
  31. Levine H. G.(1984 forthcoming) ‘What is an Alcohol‐Related Problem?Journal of Drug Issues.
  32. Cahalan D., 1970, Problem Drinkers
  33. Room R., 1978, Governing Images of Alcohol and Drug Problems
  34. Beauchamp D., 1981, Beyond Alcoholism: Alcohol and Public Health Policy
  35. Moore M., 1981, Beyond the Shadow of Prohibition: Alcohol and Public Policy

Metadata

Authors
Levine, H. G.
Venue
British Journal of Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-12
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
109-119
ISSN
  • 0952-0481
  • 2056-5178
Cited by
48
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review