The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A hierarchy of gambling disorders in the community
Abstract
Aims To help refine the definition and diagnosis of gambling disorders, we investigated the distribution among US gamblers of the 10 DSM‐IV criteria for Pathological Gambling. Design We drew data from two stratified random surveys (n = 2417, n= 530) of gambling behavior and consequences among community‐based samples of US adults. A fully structured questionnaire, administered by trained lay interviewers, screened for the life‐time prevalence of problem and Pathological Gambling. Per DSM‐IV definitions, anyone meeting five or more of 10 itemized criteria was considered a pathological gambler. We analyzed these criteria among all gamblers who met one or more criteria (n = 399). Findings Most gamblers who met only one or two criteria reported ‘chasing their losses’. At subclinical levels (three to four criteria), gamblers also reported elevated rates of gambling‐related fantasy: lying, gambling to escape and preoccupation. Pathological gamblers with five to seven criteria reported marked elevations of loss of control, withdrawal symptoms and tolerance (internalizing dimensions of dependence); risking their social relationships and needing to be bailed out financially (externalizing dimensions). Most of the highest‐level pathological gamblers (eight to 10 criteria) reported committing illegal acts to support gambling. Conclusion Dependence in a biobehavioral sense appears to be a hallmark of Pathological Gambling, but it marks only one threshold in a qualitative hierarchy of disorders beginning with a common subclinical behavior, ‘chasing’. Epidemiological assessments and future DSM revisions might consider explicit recognition of a problem gambling disorder, identifying people presenting some cognitive symptoms of Pathological Gambling but not clear signs of dependence. Pathological gamblers in turn appear to have two distinct levels of severity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling
Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x · Cited by 2,013
Toward DSM—V and the classification of psychopathology.
Widiger, T. A., & Clark, L. A. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.946 · Cited by 540
The categorical versus dimensional assessment controversy in the sociology of mental illness
Kessler, R. C. (2002) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/3090195 · Cited by 275
Cited by
Should addictive disorders include non-substance-related conditions?
Potenza, M. N. (2006) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01591.x · Cited by 663
Pathological gambling: Etiology, comorbidity, and treatment.
Petry, N. M. (2005) · doi:10.1037/10894-000 · Cited by 659
Evaluating the Problem Gambling Severity Index
Holtgraves, T. (2009) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-008-9107-7 · Cited by 300
Gender differences in the associations between past-year gambling problems and psychiatric disorders
Desai, R. A., & Potenza, M. N. (2008) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-007-0283-z · Cited by 206
MacKillop, J., Anderson, E. J., Castelda, B. A., Mattson, R. E., & Donovick, P. J. (2006) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-006-9021-9 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Toce‐Gerstein, M., Gerstein, D. R., & Volberg, R. A.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1661-1672
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2069647770
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A hierarchy of gambling disorders in the community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00545.x
- The paper
- Toce‐Gerstein, M., Gerstein, D. R., & Volberg, R. A. (2003). A hierarchy of gambling disorders in the community. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00545.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.