CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 287Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsDigital Mental Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Web-based screening and brief intervention for hazardous drinking: a double blind randomized controlled trial

Kypri, Kypros, Saunders, John B., Williams, Sheila M., McGee, Rob O., Langley, John D., Cashell‐Smith, Martine L., Gallagher, Stephen J.·2004·Addiction
DOI 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00847.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background Strong evidence exists for the efficacy of screening and brief intervention for reducing hazardous drinking. However, problems have been highlighted with respect to its implementation in health‐care systems, not least of which is a reluctance of some doctors to discuss alcohol proactively with their patients. Aims To determine the efficacy of a novel web‐based screening and brief intervention (e‐SBI) to reduce hazardous drinking. Design A double‐blind randomized controlled trial. Setting A university student health service. Participants A total of 167 students (17–26 years) were recruited in the reception area and completed a 3‐minute web‐based screen including the Alcohol Use Disorder Identifiation Test (AUDIT) questionnaire. Of these, 112 tested positive, and 104 (52 females) who consented to follow‐up were included in the trial. Measurements Drinking frequency, typical occasion quantity, total volume, heavy episode frequency (females > 80 g ethanol, males > 120 g ethanol), number of personal problems, an academic problems score. Intervention Participants were randomized to 10–15 minutes of web‐based assessment and personalized feedback on their drinking (intervention, n = 51) or to a leaflet‐only control group (n = 53). Findings Mean baseline AUDIT scores for control and intervention groups were 16.6 (SD = 6.0) and 16.6 (SD = 5.7). At 6 weeks, participants receiving e‐SBI reported significantly lower total consumption (geometric mean ratio = 0.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.56–0.96), lower heavy episode frequency (0.63; 0.42–0.92) and fewer personal problems (0.70; 0.54–0.91). At 6 months personal problems remained lower (0.76; 0.60–0.97), although consumption did not differ significantly. At 6 months, academic problems were lower in the intervention group relative to controls (0.72; 0.51–1.02). Conclusions e‐SBI reduced hazardous drinking among university students, to an extent similar to that found for practitioner‐delivered brief interventions in the general population. e‐SBI offers promise as a strategy to reduce alcohol‐related harm in a way that is non‐intrusive, appealing to the target group, and capable of being incorporated into primary care. Research is required to replicate the findings, to determine the duration of intervention effects, and to investigate the mechanisms by which the intervention operates.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00847.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nunnally J. C., 1978, Psychometric Theory

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–287 of 287

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kypri, K., Saunders, J. B., Williams, S. M., McGee, R. O., Langley, J. D., Cashell‐Smith, M. L., & Gallagher, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Kypri, Kypros
ORCID
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-24
Volume
99
Issue
11
Pages
1410-1417
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
DOI
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00847.x
OpenAlex
W1968732844
Cited by
287
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 27
FWCI
10.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
hazardous drinking, university students, alcohol consumption, personalized feedback, AUDIT questionnaire, alcohol-related harm, academic difficulties
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk, Students, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review