Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Full participation in harm reduction programmes is associated with decreased risk for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus: evidence from the Amsterdam Cohort Studies among drug users

Open access
Van Den Berg, Charlotte, Smit, Colette, Van Brussel, Giel, Coutinho, Roel, Prins, Maria·2007·Addiction

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the impact of harm‐reduction programmes on HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) incidence among ever‐injecting drug users (DU) from the Amsterdam Cohort Studies (ACS). Methods The association between use of harm reduction and seroconversion for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) was evaluated using Poisson regression. A total of 714 DU were at risk for HIV and/or HCV during follow‐up. Harm reduction was measured by combining its two most important components—methadone dose and needle exchange programme (NEP) use—and looking at five categories of participation, ranging from no participation (no methadone in the past 6 months, injecting drug use in the past 6 months and no use of NEP) to full participation (≥ 60 mg methadone/day and no current injecting or ≥ 60 mg methadone/day and current injecting but all needles exchanged). Results Methadone dose or NEP use alone were not associated significantly with HIV or HCV seroconversion. However, with combination of these variables and after correction for possibly confounding variables, we found that full participation in a harm reduction programme (HRP) was associated with a lower risk of HIV and HCV infection in ever‐injecting drug users (DU), compared to no participation [incidence rate ratio 0.43 (95% CI 0.21–0.87) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.13–1.03), respectively]. Conclusions In conclusion, we found that full participation in HRP was associated with a lower incidence of HCV and HIV infection in ever‐injecting DU, indicating that combined prevention measures—but not the use of NEP or methadone alone—might contribute to the reduction of the spread of these infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01912.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95459110.x · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95459110.x
  2. 10.1097/01.aids.0000242824.59377.53 · doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000242824.59377.53
  3. 10.1080/09540120050123855 · doi:10.1080/09540120050123855
  4. 10.1093/ije/28.3.514 · doi:10.1093/ije/28.3.514
  5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12831-0 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12831-0

Cited by

See all 316

Metadata

Authors
Van Den Berg, C., Smit, C., Van Brussel, G., Coutinho, R., & Prins, M.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-09
Volume
102
Issue
9
Pages
1454-1462
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2164227241
Cited by
316
References
19
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Full participation in harm reduction programmes is associated with decreased risk for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus: evidence from the Amsterdam Cohort Studies among drug users. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01912.x
The paper
Van Den Berg, C., Smit, C., Van Brussel, G., Coutinho, R., & Prins, M. (2007). Full participation in harm reduction programmes is associated with decreased risk for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus: evidence from the Amsterdam Cohort Studies among drug users. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01912.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.