Cited by 139Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMental Health Treatment and AccessOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socio-demographic risk factors for alcohol and drug dependence: the 10-year follow-up of the national comorbidity survey

Open access

Abstract

AIMS: Continued progress in etiological research and prevention science requires more precise information concerning the specific stages at which socio-demographic variables are implicated most strongly in transition from initial substance use to dependence. The present study examines prospective associations between socio-demographic variables and the subsequent onset of alcohol and drug dependence using data from the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) and the NCS Follow-up survey (NCS-2). DESIGN: The NCS was a nationally representative survey of the prevalence and correlates of DSM-III-R mental and substance disorders in the United States carried out in 1990-2002. The NCS-2 re-interviewed a probability subsample of NCS respondents a decade after the baseline survey. Baseline NCS socio-demographic characteristics and substance use history were examined as predictors of the first onset of DSM-IV alcohol and drug dependence in the NCS-2. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5001 NCS respondents were re-interviewed in the NCS-2 (87.6% of baseline sample). FINDINGS: Aggregate analyses demonstrated significant associations between some baseline socio-demographic variables (young age, low education, non-white ethnicity, occupational status) but not others (sex, number of children, residential area) and the subsequent onset of DSM-IV alcohol or drug dependence. However, conditional models showed that these risk factors were limited to specific stages of baseline use. Moreover, many socio-demographic variables that were not significant in the aggregate analyses were significant predictors of dependence when examined by stage of use. CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the potential for socio-demographic risk factors to have highly specific associations with different stages of the substance use trajectory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02622.x

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rehm J., 2004, Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors, 959
  2. First M. B., 2002, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Non‐patient Edition (SCID‐I/NP)
  3. Research Triangle Institute, 2004, SUDAAN: Professional Software for Survey Data Analysis, 9.0

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 139

Metadata

Authors
Swendsen, J., Conway, K. P., Degenhardt, L., Dierker, L., Glantz, M., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., Sampson, N., & Kessler, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (AU)
  • Wesleyan University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Swendsen, Joel
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-13
Volume
104
Issue
8
Pages
1346-1355
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2137453755
Cited by
139
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • John W. Alden Trust
  • World Health Organization
  • National Institutes of Health (5r13mh066849-04, 5r01mh069864-04, 5r01mh070884-05)
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  • Johnson and Johnson
  • Pan American Health Organization
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R13-MH-066849, ZIAMH002806, R01‐MH070884, R01MH046376, R01MH077883, Z01MH002806, U01MH060220, R01‐MH069864)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA016558, R01DA012058)
  • Fogarty International Center (R03TW006481)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
alcoholism, drug addiction, sociodemographic risk factors, substance use onset, National Comorbidity Survey, DSM-IV, low educational attainment, young age, occupational status
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, United States, Comorbidity, Substance-Related Disorders, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review