The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender and alcohol consumption: patterns from the multinational GENACIS project
Open accessAbstract
Aims To evaluate multinational patterns of gender‐ and age‐specific alcohol consumption. Design and participants Large general‐population surveys of men's and women's drinking behavior (n's > 900) in 35 countries in 1997–2007 used a standardized questionnaire (25 countries) or measures comparable to those in the standardized questionnaire. Measurements Data from men and women in three age groups (18–34, 35–49, 50–65) showed the prevalence of drinkers, former drinkers, and lifetime abstainers; and the prevalence of high‐frequency, high‐volume, and heavy episodic drinking among current drinkers. Analyses examined gender ratios for prevalence rates and the direction of changes in prevalence rates across age groups. Findings Drinking per se and high‐volume drinking were consistently more prevalent among men than among women, but lifetime abstention from alcohol was consistently more prevalent among women. Among respondents who had ever been drinkers, women in all age groups were consistently more likely to have stopped drinking than men were. Among drinkers, the prevalence of high‐frequency drinking was consistently greatest in the oldest age group, particularly among men. Unexpectedly, the prevalence of drinking per se did not decline consistently with increasing age, and declines in high‐volume and heavy episodic drinking with increasing age were more typical in Europe and English‐speaking countries. Conclusions As expected, men still exceed women in drinking and high‐volume drinking, although gender ratios vary. Better explanations are needed for why more women than men quit drinking, and why aging does not consistently reduce drinking and heavy drinking outside Europe and English‐speaking countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Binge Drinking Among US Adults
Naimi, T. S., Brewer, R. D., Mokdad, A., Denny, C., Serdula, M. K., & Marks, J. S. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.1.70 · Cited by 987
Cited by
Sharma, R., Abbasi-Kangevari, M., Abd-Rabu, R., Abidi, H., Abu-Gharbieh, E., Acuna, J. M., Adhikari, S., Advani, S. M., Afzal, M. S., Aghaie Meybodi, M., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00044-9 · Cited by 650
Slade, T., Chapman, C., Swift, W., Keyes, K., Tonks, Z., & Teesson, M. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011827 · Cited by 463
White, A., Castle, I. P., Chen, C. M., Shirley, M., Roach, D., & Hingson, R. (2015) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.12815 · Cited by 378
Gender and prescription opioids: Findings from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health
Back, S. E., Payne, R. L., Simpson, A. N., & Brady, K. T. (2010) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.06.018 · Cited by 240
Graham, K., Bernards, S., Wilsnack, S. C., & Gmel, G. (2011) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260510370596 · Cited by 220
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilsnack, R. W., Wilsnack, S. C., Kristjanson, A. F., Vogeltanz‐Holm, N. D., & Gmel, G.
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-08-03
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1487-1500
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- OpenAlex
- W2141740943
- Cited by
- 714
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender and alcohol consumption: patterns from the multinational GENACIS project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02696.x
- The paper
- Wilsnack, R. W., Wilsnack, S. C., Kristjanson, A. F., Vogeltanz‐Holm, N. D., & Gmel, G. (2009). Gender and alcohol consumption: patterns from the multinational GENACIS project. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02696.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.