Cited by 62

The association between use of snus and quit rates for smoking: results from seven Norwegian cross-sectional studies

Lund, Karl E., Scheffels, Janne, McNeill, Ann·2011·Addiction

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03122.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [7]Stenbeck M Hagquist C Rosén M The association of snus and smoking behavior: a cohort analysis of Swedish males in the 1990s Addiction 2009 1004 1579 85 19686528
  2. [8]Ramstrom L Foulds J Role of snus in initiation and cessation of tobacco smoking in Sweden Tob Control 2006 15 210 4 16728752 PMC2564662
  3. [10]Øverland S Hetland J Aarø LE Relative harm of snus and cigarettes: what do Norwegian adolescents say? Tob Control 2008 17 422 5 18849315
  4. [11]Lund KE Tefre E Amundsen A Nordlund S Røyking, Bruk Av Snus Og Annen Risikoatferd Blant Studenter [Smoking, use of snus and other risk behaviour among university students] Tidskr nor legeforen 2008 128 1808 11 18787588
  5. [14]Lund KE McNeill A Scheffels J The use of snus for quitting smoking compared with medicinal products Nicotine Tob Res 2010 12 817 22 20622023 PMC2910876
  6. [16]Henley SJ Connell CJ Richter P Husten C Pechacek T Calle E Tobacco-related disease mortality among men who switched from cigarettes to spit tobacco Tob Control 2007 16 22 8 17297069 PMC2598436
  7. [17]Levy DT Mumford EA Cummings KM Gilpin EA Giovino G Hyland A Sweanor D The relative risks of a low-nitrosamine smokeless tobacco product compared with smoking cigarettes: estimates of a panel of experts Cancer Epidemiol Biomakers Prev 2004 13 2035 42 15598758
  8. [18]Gartner CE Hall WH Vos TH Bertram MY Wallace AL Lim SS Assessment of Swedish snus for tobacco harm reduction: an epidemiological modeling study Lancet 2007 369 2010 4 17498798
  9. [19]Gilljam H Galanti MR Role of snus (oral moist snuff) in smoking cessation and smoking reduction in Sweden Addiction 2003 98 1183 9 12930201
  10. [20]Hagquist CEI Health inequalities among adolescents: the impact of academic orientation and parents' education Eur J Public Health 2006 17 21 6 16777839
  11. [22]Timberlake DS Huh J Lakon CM Use of propensity score matching in evaluating smokeless tobacco as a gateway to smoking Nicotine Tob Res 2009 11 455 62 19307445
  12. [23]Severson HH Forester KA Biglan A Use of smokeless tobacco is a risk factor for cigarette smoking Nicotine Tob Res 2007 9 1331 7 18058351
  13. [24]Kozlowski LT Strasser AA Giovino GA Erickson PA Terza JV Applying the risk/use equilibrium: use medicinal nicotine now for harm reduction Tob Control 2001 10 201 3 11544374 PMC1747574

Authors
Lund, K. E., Scheffels, J., & McNeill, A.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-30
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
162-167
ISSN
0965-2140
Cited by
62
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review