Cited by 55Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

The development of tobacco use in adolescence among ”snus starters” and ”cigarette starters”: An analysis of the Swedish ”BROMS” cohort

Galanti, Maria Rosaria, Rosendahl, Ingvar, Wickholm, Seppo·2008·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

Whether the use of smokeless tobacco can facilitate the transition to cigarette smoking and/or to prolonged tobacco use in adolescence is unclear. We analyzed data from a cohort of 2,938 Swedish adolescents, with six follow-up assessments of tobacco use between the ages of 11 and 18 years. The majority of tobacco users (70%) started by smoking cigarettes, 11% took up snus before smoking, and 19% used both tobacco types close in time. Ever users of tobacco at baseline had a higher risk of being current smokers and/or smokeless tobacco users at the end of follow-up compared with never users, with the highest excess relative risk for "mixed users." Adolescents who initiated tobacco use with cigarettes had a non-significantly increased probability to end up as current smokers compared with snus starters (adjusted OR=1.42; 95% CI 0.98-2.10) The OR of smoking for "mixed starters" was 2.54 (95% CI 1.68-3.91). The risk of becoming current user of any tobacco was also significantly enhanced for "mixed starters." Marked sex differences were observed in these associations, as initiation with cigarettes rather than with snus predicted current smoking or tobacco use only among females. Progression of tobacco use in adolescence is not predicted by onset with snus or cigarettes, but rather by initiation with both tobacco types close in time and/or at young age. The proportion of adolescent smoking prevalence attributable to a potential induction effect of snus is likely small.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14622200701825858

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galanti, M. R., Rosendahl, I., & Wickholm, S.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Galanti, Maria Rosaria
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2008-02
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
315-323
ISSN
1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080286049
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
tobacco initiation, snus, smokeless tobacco, cigarette smoking, adolescent smoking, induction effects, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Life Style, Male, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Risk-Taking, School Health Services, Smoking, Social Environment, Students, Sweden, Tobacco Use Disorder, Tobacco, Smokeless, Prevalence, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review