Delay discounting by adolescents experimenting with cigarette smoking
Open accessAbstract
Aims To evaluate delay discounting and self‐reported impulsive behavior in a sample of adolescents experimenting with cigarette smoking compared with adolescents who had never smoked or were daily smokers. Design A cross‐sectional design was used to compare smoking‐status groups. Setting Columbus, Ohio, a city of approximately 780 000 people. Participants A sample of 141 male and female adolescents with a mean age of 15.37 (standard deviation = 1.09) years. Measurements Primary measures included a computerized assessment of delay discounting, a self‐report assessment of impulsivity [Barratt Impulsiveness Scale—adolescent (BIS‐11‐A)] and verifications of cigarette smoking status (breath carbon monoxide and urinary cotinine level). Findings Smokers discounted more by delay and had higher impulsivity scores than non‐smokers. Experimenters had scores intermediate to those of smokers and non‐smokers on both measures. In some analyses the difference between experimenters and non‐smokers was significant, with experimenters showing greater delay discounting, but in no case did experimenters differ significantly from the smokers. Conclusions Young people who experiment with cigarettes appear to be similar to those who smoke regularly in terms of tendency to discount future gains and report impulsive tendencies, and generally higher in these traits than non‐smokers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Impatience is linked to greater substance use and risk-taking in adolescents.
“research indicates that impatience is related to increased adolescent substance use and risk-taking (10 -13).”
From Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 72
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [9]Rachlin H Brown J Cross D Discounting in judgments of delay and probability Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2000 13 2 145 159
- [30]Kaufman AS Kaufman NL Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition: Manual 2004 2nd ed Circle Pines AGS
- Authors
- Reynolds, B., & Fields, S.
- Affiliations
- Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reynolds, Brady
- ORCID
- Fields, Sherecce
- Venue
- Addiction
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01-17
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 417-424
- ISSN
- 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0443
- PMC
- PMC3260343
- OpenAlex
- W1558731097
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Addiction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA020423)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- delay discounting, adolescent smoking, impulsivity, smoking status, tobacco use
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Ohio, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Smoking, Time Factors, Area Under Curve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review