Cited by 72Smoking Behavior and CessationDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Delay discounting by adolescents experimenting with cigarette smoking

Open access
Reynolds, Brady, Fields, Sherecce·2012·Addiction

Abstract

Aims To evaluate delay discounting and self‐reported impulsive behavior in a sample of adolescents experimenting with cigarette smoking compared with adolescents who had never smoked or were daily smokers. Design A cross‐sectional design was used to compare smoking‐status groups. Setting Columbus, Ohio, a city of approximately 780 000 people. Participants A sample of 141 male and female adolescents with a mean age of 15.37 (standard deviation = 1.09) years. Measurements Primary measures included a computerized assessment of delay discounting, a self‐report assessment of impulsivity [Barratt Impulsiveness Scale—adolescent (BIS‐11‐A)] and verifications of cigarette smoking status (breath carbon monoxide and urinary cotinine level). Findings Smokers discounted more by delay and had higher impulsivity scores than non‐smokers. Experimenters had scores intermediate to those of smokers and non‐smokers on both measures. In some analyses the difference between experimenters and non‐smokers was significant, with experimenters showing greater delay discounting, but in no case did experimenters differ significantly from the smokers. Conclusions Young people who experiment with cigarettes appear to be similar to those who smoke regularly in terms of tendency to discount future gains and report impulsive tendencies, and generally higher in these traits than non‐smokers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03644.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 72

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]Rachlin H Brown J Cross D Discounting in judgments of delay and probability Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2000 13 2 145 159
  2. [30]Kaufman AS Kaufman NL Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Second Edition: Manual 2004 2nd ed Circle Pines AGS

Authors
Reynolds, B., & Fields, S.
Affiliations
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Reynolds, Brady
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-17
Volume
107
Issue
2
Pages
417-424
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1558731097
Cited by
72
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA020423)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
delay discounting, adolescent smoking, impulsivity, smoking status, tobacco use
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Ohio, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Smoking, Time Factors, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review