Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Compared with children and adults, teens and young adults often exhibit greater impulsivity and corresponding increases in emergency room visits, accidents from drug or alcohol use, and increased mortality risk. However, it remains poorly understood how increased impulsivity during adolescence may be explained in terms of brain and cognitive development. We focused on impatience, a central component of impulsiveness. We relate impatient behavior on a decision-making task to changes in connectivity within the brain’s frontostriatal circuitry. Our results suggest that relative future orientation, not sensitivity to immediate rewards, determines adolescent impatience. These findings may help to design interventions to prevent the detrimental effects of adolescent impulsiveness and serve as a template for understanding neurodevelopmental disorders.
Verified 2026-10-07 · 1 reference not checked yet
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a cross-sectional multimodal MRI study of 50 participants aged 8–25, adolescents were more impatient on an intertemporal choice task and reported less future orientation, but not more present hedonism, than young adults. Stronger right dorsolateral prefrontal–medial striatal structural connectivity was associated with greater negative functional coupling during larger-later choices and lower discount rates, suggesting increased control and future-oriented thought drive age-related reductions in impatience.
Key findings
- Discount rates declined with age across 8–25 y (linear: r = 0.46, P < 0.001; asymptotic: r = 0.48, P < 0.001), best described by an asymptotic trajectory with accelerated decline in early adolescence. Future orientation increased with age (linear: r = 0.42, P < 0.005; asymptotic: r = 0.44, P < 0.004), while present hedonism showed no age-related change (all P > 0.45). Future orientation correlated with more patient choices (r = −0.42, P < 0.005); present hedonism did not (r = 0.22, P = 0.17), though it did when controlling for age (r = 0.29, P < 0.05).
- Right medial striatum–right dlPFC tract strength was negatively correlated with log k (r = −0.47, P < 0.001); similar trends were found for right vlPFC (r = −0.48, P = 0.007) and left vlPFC (r = −0.37, P = 0.049). Amygdala tract strength was not initially associated with discounting (r = 0.26, P < 0.11) but was positively correlated with discount rates when controlling for age (r = 0.65, P < 0.001).
- Right dlPFC showed increased negative coupling with medial striatum during decision versus baseline (t(47) = −7.321, P < 0.001), and this negative coupling was greater for larger-later versus smaller-sooner choices (t(47) = 6.63, P < 0.001). The functional connectivity difference correlated with structural connectivity (r = 0.42, P < 0.004) and discount rates (r = 0.41, P < 0.005). A serial mediation model supported an indirect path from age through structural and functional connectivity with right dlPFC to discounting (95% CI 0.05, 0.22).
- Specificity analyses: stop-signal reaction time decreased with age (linear: r = 0.55, P < 0.001; asymptotic: r = 0.58, P < 0.001), was not related to delay discounting (r = 0.25, P = 0.23), and correlated with right IFG–striatum tract strength (r = −0.31, P = 0.045) but not right dlPFC–striatum structural or functional connectivity (r = −0.15, P = 0.33; r = 0.06, P = 0.66).
Methods
- Fifty participants (26 females), ages 8–25 y (M = 16.76, SD = 4.55), completed a delay-discounting task with 130 intertemporal choices in and outside the scanner, the Zimbardo Time Perspective Index (present hedonism and future orientation), a stop-signal task, Raven Standard Progressive Matrices, and pubertal status on a subset.
- DTI probabilistic tractography used striatal seed masks and 10 a priori target regions; striatal voxels were classified by highest connection probability, and tract strength was correlated with log k. fMRI during delay discounting was analyzed with PPI using functionally defined right dlPFC/right vlPFC ROIs and structurally defined striatal segments.
- Analyses used robust linear regressions testing linear, adolescent-peak, and asymptotic age trends; Bayesian model comparison; a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P < 4.545 × 10⁻³ for 11 tracts; and serial mediation via Hayes’ PROCESS.
Limitations
- Stated: the authors found no support for immediate-reward sensitivity driving adolescent impatience and note this may be due to the low affective content of the stimuli; they suggest social or emotional contexts may reveal reward-sensitivity effects.
- Stated: probabilistic tractography and PPI cannot resolve the direction of connectivity, so the top-down control interpretation needs further testing, for example with dynamic causal modeling. Impulsivity is multidimensional, and intertemporal choice taps mainly impatience; more tasks and a wider age range are needed.
- Evident from the text: the cross-sectional design and mediation analysis cannot establish causal developmental direction; the modest sample (n = 50) and pubertal data available only in a subset further limit power and generalizability.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 47 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 4
Participants with greater future orientation made more patient choices on the intertemporal choice task.
“we found that those participants who showed increased future orientation also made more patient choices in the intertemporal choice task ( r = -0.42, P < 0.005; Fig. 1 E ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 4
Present hedonism was significantly related to discounting when age was controlled.
“we found that there was a significant relationship between individual differences in present hedonism and discounting when controlling for age ( r = 0.29, P < 0.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Findingown data§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2
Delay discount rates decreased with age across adolescence in the sample.
“We report that adolescents were more impatient on an intertemporal choice task”
- Also stated in: § Results · p. 4 · plain
“there was a decline in impatience across adolescence among our subjects.”
- Also stated in: § Results · p. 3 · hedged
“Discount rates estimated from the delay-discounting task were smaller with age across adolescence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Also stated in: § Results · p. 4 · plain
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 5
The right medial striatum region overlapped with the striatal segment identified in structural analyses to be connected with the dlPFC.
“the right medial striatum region overlapped with the striatal segment that we identified in the structural analyses to be connected with the dlPFC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 4
An asymptotic developmental trajectory with accelerated decline in impulsive choices in early adolescence best described changes in discount rates with age.
“Bayesian model comparisons indicated that an asymptotic developmental trajectory with an accelerated decline in impulsive choices in early adolescence provided the best description of changes in discount rates with age (Table S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 5
There were no significant responses for the opposite SS-LL contrast.
“We did not find any significant responses for the opposite (SS -LL) contrast.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 6
The difference in dlPFC-striatal functional connectivity between larger, later and smaller, sooner trials correlated with discount rates.
“Finally, the difference in dlPFC -striatal functional connectivity between LL and SS trials correlated with structural connectivity ( r = 0.42, P < 0.004; Fig. 4 E ), and discount rates ( r = 0.41, P < 0.005; Fig. 4 F ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 6
Negative coupling between the right dlPFC and the medial striatum was greater for choices of larger, later rewards than for smaller, sooner rewards.
“More importantly, the negative coupling between the right dlPFC and the medial striatum was greater for choices of LL versus SS rewards [ t (47) = 6.63, P < 0.001; Fig. 4 D ].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 5
There was an overall reduction of striatal activity with age.
“a post hoc ANOVA ROI analysis, which indicated that there was an overall reduction of striatal activity with age ( F = 6.26, P < 0.015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 6
The right vlPFC did not show a significant change in functional connectivity with the medial striatum during the decision period compared with baseline.
“These analyses revealed that the right dlPFC, but not the right vlPFC, showed a significant change in connectivity with the medial striatum during the decision period versus baseline [ t (47) = -7.321, P < 0.001, and t (47) = -0.92, P = 0.83, respectively].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2
Future orientation increased with age across adolescence in the sample.
“reported less future orientation, but not more present hedonism, than young adults”
- Also stated in: § Results · p. 4 · plain
“we found an increase in reported future orientation with age (linear: r = 0.42, P < 0.005; asymptotic: r = 0.44, P < 0.004; Fig. 1 D ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · p. 4 · plain
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 6
In the serial mediation analysis, the 95% confidence interval around the indirect path was entirely above zero, from 0.05 to 0.22.
“The 95% confidence interval around the indirect path was entirely above zero (0.05, 0.22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 5
The LL-SS contrast identified regions in right dlPFC, right vlPFC, right parietal cortex, and left cerebellum.
“This contrast [i.e., LL -SS; familywise error (FWE) corrected, P < 0.05] identified regions in the right dlPFC [Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinates: 18, 26, 52], right vlPFC (MNI: 34, 38, -4), right parietal cortex (MNI: 30, -66, 44), and left cerebellum (MNI: -44, -64, -42).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 6
During the decision phase of the delay-discounting task, the right dlPFC showed a significant change in functional connectivity with the medial striatum compared with baseline.
“These analyses revealed that the right dlPFC, but not the right vlPFC, showed a significant change in connectivity with the medial striatum during the decision period versus baseline [ t (47) = -7.321, P < 0.001, and t (47) = -0.92, P = 0.83, respectively].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 5
These age trends in local activation were not correlated with the age-related decline in discounting across subjects.
“these measures were not correlated across subjects ( r = 0.18, P = 0.16).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 5
Amygdala tract strength was positively correlated with discount rates when controlling for age.
“amygdala tract strength was positively correlated with discount rates when controlling for age ( r = 0.65, P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 5
Each of these areas was more active when participants made LL compared with SS choices.
“Each of these areas was more active when participants made LL compared with SS choices (Fig. 4 A ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2
Present hedonism did not change with age across adolescence in the sample.
“but not more present hedonism”
- Also stated in: § Results · p. 4 · plain
“we did not find any age-related change in present hedonism (all three values of P > 0.45).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · p. 4 · plain
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 5
All tracts showed an increase in connectivity strength with age, except for the mOFC, left vlPFC, and hippocampus.
“We found that all tracts showed an increase in connectivity strength with age, except for the mOFC, the left vlPFC, and the hippocampus (Fig. 2 C and Table S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 6
The change in right dlPFC-medial striatum connectivity during the decision phase was an increase in negative coupling.
“That is, there was increased negative coupling between the right dlPFC and the medial striatum during the decision phase of the delay-discounting task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 6
The difference in dlPFC-striatal functional connectivity between larger, later and smaller, sooner trials correlated with structural connectivity.
“Finally, the difference in dlPFC -striatal functional connectivity between LL and SS trials correlated with structural connectivity ( r = 0.42, P < 0.004; Fig. 4 E ), and discount rates ( r = 0.41, P < 0.005; Fig. 4 F ).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · p. 7 · plain
“Consistent with this interpretation, our results showed that developmental differences in structural connectivity are associated with changes in functional connectivity.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · p. 7 · plain
“That is, structural connectivity was related to increased negative functional coupling between the right dlPFC and the striatum when choosing LL versus SS rewards.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · p. 7 · plain
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 5
Similar negative correlations were found between discount rates and tract strength for the right and left vlPFC.
“Similar trends were found for the right ( r = -0.48, P = 0.007) and left ( r = -0.37, P = 0.049) vlPFC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 5
The age-related reduction in striatal activity was mainly driven by decreased medial striatal activity when subjects chose LL rewards, not SS rewards.
“this age-related reduction was mainly driven by decreased medial striatal activity when subjects chose LL rewards ( F = 7.13, P < 0.009; Fig. 4 C ), not SS rewards ( F = 2.13, P = 0.14).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2
Developmental increases in structural connectivity strength in the right dorsolateral prefrontal tract were related to increased negative functional coupling with the striatum.
“Developmental increases in structural connectivity strength in the right dorsolateral prefrontal tract were related to increased negative functional coupling with the striatum”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 5
Increased connectivity with the amygdala was not associated with increased impulsiveness.
“we did not find that increased connectivity with the amygdala was associated with increased impulsiveness ( r = 0.26, P < 0.11).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 4
Present hedonism was not related to discount rates.
“There was no relationship between present hedonism and discount rates ( r = 0.22, P = 0.17; Fig. 1 E ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 7
Discounting decreased across adolescence.
“In line with previous studies, we observed a decrease in discounting across adolescence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 7
Future orientation increased with age.
“Furthermore, we found that future orientation increased with age and was correlated with developmental decreases in discounting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 6
Stop-signal reaction time correlated significantly with right IFG-striatum tract strength.
“Consistent with several studies (53), there was a significant correlation between SSRT and right IFG -striatum tract strength ( r = -0.31, P = 0.045) but, importantly, not with structural and functional connectivity of the right dlPFC -striatum ( r = -0.15, P = 0.33, and r = 0.06, P = 0.66, respectively; Fig. S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Discussion · p. 7
Age was associated with an increase in structural connectivity strength in most of the identified striatal tracts.
“In agreement with previous literature, we found that age was associated with an increase in structural connectivity strength in most of the identified striatal tracts (55).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 7
The immediacy effect did not predict developmental differences in discounting.
“These latter measures also did not predict developmental differences in discounting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 7
Present hedonism did not predict developmental differences in discounting.
“These latter measures also did not predict developmental differences in discounting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Behavioral Measures and Self-Report. · p. 8
The level of choice conflict was moderate, with a mean of 0.12.
“First, it shows that the level of choice conflict is moderate (M = 0.12) and that there were no age differences in experienced choice conflict ( r = 0.17, P = 0.22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 7
Future orientation was correlated with developmental decreases in discounting.
“Furthermore, we found that future orientation increased with age and was correlated with developmental decreases in discounting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Behavioral Measures and Self-Report. · p. 8
There were no age differences in experienced choice conflict.
“First, it shows that the level of choice conflict is moderate (M = 0.12) and that there were no age differences in experienced choice conflict ( r = 0.17, P = 0.22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 7
There were no developmental differences in present hedonism.
“However, we found no developmental differences in present hedonism or the immediacy effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 7
There were no developmental differences in the immediacy effect.
“However, we found no developmental differences in present hedonism or the immediacy effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 7
The developmental decrease in impatience is related to increased future orientation.
“( ii ) This developmental decrease is related to increased future orientation and is accompanied by specific changes in functional and anatomical connectivity in medial striatal tracts connecting with dlPFC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 7
The study did not find support for the hypothesis that sensitivity to immediate rewards drives adolescents' impatience.
“First, it is noteworthy that we did not find any support for the hypothesis that sensitivity to immediate rewards drives adolescents ' impatience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 7
Increased strength of the medial striatum-dlPFC tract was selectively associated with a decrease in impatient behavior.
“More interestingly, consistent with our previous results, increased strength of the medial striatum -dlPFC tract was selectively associated with a decrease in impatient behavior.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 6
Stop-signal reaction time did not correlate significantly with right dlPFC-striatum structural connectivity.
“Consistent with several studies (53), there was a significant correlation between SSRT and right IFG -striatum tract strength ( r = -0.31, P = 0.045) but, importantly, not with structural and functional connectivity of the right dlPFC -striatum ( r = -0.15, P = 0.33, and r = 0.06, P = 0.66, respectively; Fig. S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 6
Stop-signal reaction time did not correlate significantly with right dlPFC-striatum functional connectivity.
“Consistent with several studies (53), there was a significant correlation between SSRT and right IFG -striatum tract strength ( r = -0.31, P = 0.045) but, importantly, not with structural and functional connectivity of the right dlPFC -striatum ( r = -0.15, P = 0.33, and r = 0.06, P = 0.66, respectively; Fig. S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 6
There was no significant relation between stop-signal reaction time and delay discounting in the data.
“However, there was no significant relation between SSRT and delay discounting in our data (log k , r = 0.25, P = 0.23).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2
Explicitly instructed future orientation reduces discount rates within subjects.
“Explicitly instructed future orientation leads to ( i ) withinsubject reduction in discount rates (27 -29)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2
Impatience is linked to greater substance use and risk-taking in adolescents.
“research indicates that impatience is related to increased adolescent substance use and risk-taking (10 -13).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2
Adolescence is a developmental stage marked by higher impulsivity than childhood or adulthood.
“Adolescence is a developmental period associated with an increase in impulsivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ Results · p. 6
More patient participants showed increased negative coupling between the right dlPFC and the medial striatum when choosing larger, later rewards compared with smaller, sooner rewards.
“Taken together, these findings suggest that ( i ) the more patient participants showed increased negative coupling between right dlPFC and the medial striatum when choosing LL compared with when choosing SS rewards, and ( ii ) these participants also had stronger structural connectivity between the right dlPFC and the medial striatum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Results · p. 5
The development of striatal connections with the lateral prefrontal cortex, particularly the right dlPFC, plays a role in the age-related decrease in impulsivity.
“Taken together, these results suggest that the development of the striatal connections with the lateral prefrontal cortex, particularly the right dlPFC, plays a role in age-related decrease in impulsivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Results · p. 4
These results support a cognitive control account of the development of temporal discounting.
“Taken together, these results provide support for a cognitive control account of the development of temporal discounting.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Interpretationown data§ Results · p. 6
Increased right dlPFC activity during larger, later choices is associated with reduced medial striatal activity.
“This suggests that the increased right dlPFC activity during LL choices is associated with reduced medial striatal activity, which is consistent with the ROI analyses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Significance · p. 3
Discount rates depend on the strength of connections within and between valuation and control networks.
“discount rates are not only associated with regional changes within the valuation and control networks, but also depend on the strength of connections within and between these networks (31).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2
The reduction in impatience across adolescence is mainly driven by increased control and integration of future-oriented thought.
“Our results suggest that mainly increased control, and the integration of future-oriented thought, drives the reduction in impatience across adolescence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Study design and conductown data§ Results · p. 4
Choice variability was not correlated with the discount rate k.
“choice variability was not correlated with the discount rate k ( r = 0.11, P = 0.34).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Study design and conductown data§ Results · p. 4
The quality of hyperbolic model fits did not vary with age.
“the quality of the hyperbolic model fits (i.e., bestfitting log-likelihood values) did not vary with age [all three (linear, peak, and emerging trends) values of P > 0.38)].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Study design and conductown data§ Results · p. 3
Estimated discount rates from the prescanner and within-scanner tasks were highly correlated.
“Given the high correlation between estimated discount rates between the prescanner and within-scanner tasks ( r = 0.84, P < 0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Premisecitation§ Significance · p. 3
Many functional imaging studies using cognitive control tasks show increased engagement of lateral prefrontal areas across adolescence.
“many functional imaging studies, using tasks that require cognitive control, have shown increased engagement of lateral prefrontal areas across adolescence (38 -40).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning§ Results · p. 4
Future orientation appears to underlie age-related changes in impatience.
“it is future orientation that appears to underlie age-related changes in impatience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Interpretationown data§ Results · p. 6
More patient participants had stronger structural connectivity between the right dlPFC and the medial striatum.
“Taken together, these findings suggest that ( i ) the more patient participants showed increased negative coupling between right dlPFC and the medial striatum when choosing LL compared with when choosing SS rewards, and ( ii ) these participants also had stronger structural connectivity between the right dlPFC and the medial striatum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Significance · p. 3
Early development of the valuation system is indicated by increases in striatal dopamine levels, dopamine receptor availability, and BOLD activity to rewarding stimuli in early adolescence.
“Indications of the early development of the valuation system include increases in striatal dopamine levels, dopamine receptor availability, and blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) activity related to rewarding stimuli in early adolescence (34, 35)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Study design and conductown data§ Results · p. 4
Age was not significantly related to the estimated inverse temperature parameter.
“there was no significant relationship between age and the estimated inverse temperature parameter ( m ; all three values of P > 0.24).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
- Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 7
The developmental decrease in impatience is accompanied by specific changes in functional and anatomical connectivity in medial striatal tracts connecting with dlPFC.
“( ii ) This developmental decrease is related to increased future orientation and is accompanied by specific changes in functional and anatomical connectivity in medial striatal tracts connecting with dlPFC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Age-related differences observed cross-sectionally in connectivity and behavior reflect developmental change over adolescence.
- Study design and conductnone given§ Behavioral Measures and Self-Report. · p. 8
The task construction procedures produced individual choice sets that did not differ in level of choice conflict across age groups.
“Importantly, these task construction procedures led to individual choice sets that did not differ in level of choice conflict for different age groups (see below).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 7
Goal-oriented cognitive control processes play a fundamental role in the developmental reduction in impatience, at least as assessed with intertemporal decision making.
“Taken together, these findings suggest a fundamental role for goal-oriented cognitive control processes in the developmental reduction in impatience, at least as assessed with intertemporal decision making.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Discussion · p. 7
The striatum is organized in a ventromedial-to-dorsolateral gradient.
“Consistent with conclusions based on decades of animal work (70, 71), our results indicate that the striatum is organized in a ventromedial-to-dorsolateral gradient.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 7
Behavioral and imaging results suggest that increased control, rather than sensitivity to immediate rewards, drives developmental reductions in impatience.
“( i ) Our behavioral and imaging results suggest that it is mainly increased control, not sensitivity to immediate rewards, that drives developmental reductions in impatience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Discussion · p. 7
Animal tracing studies suggest that tracts between the striatum and prefrontal regions are likely afferent, providing input to the striatum.
“However, based on animal tracing studies, it is likely that the tracts between the striatum and prefrontal regions are afferent (i.e., providing input to the striatum) (58), suggesting the hypothesis that the reduction in impatience is due to top-down control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ Discussion · p. 7
The nonlinear developmental trend suggests that impatient behavior peaks in early adolescence.
“The nonlinear developmental trend suggests that impatient behavior peaks in early adolescence (1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Age-related differences observed cross-sectionally in connectivity and behavior reflect developmental change over adolescence.
- Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 7
Increased efficiency in the inhibitory interaction between dlPFC and striatum is important for the development of intertemporal decision making.
“These results support the hypothesis that increased efficiency in the inhibitory interaction between dlPFC and striatum is important for the development of intertemporal decision making.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 15
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 5A linear age-related increase best described the data for all tracts except the right vlPFC, which was best fit by the asymptotic trend.
“a linear age-related increase best described the data for all of the tracts except for the right vlPFC, which was best fit by the asymptotic trend.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 6Stop-signal reaction time decreased with age, both in a linear and in an asymptotic model.
“Consistent with previous findings, we found that SSRT decreased with age (linear: r = 0.55, P < 0.001; asymptotic: r = 0.58, P < 0.001; Fig. S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 5Age-related changes were found in right medial striatum, left medial striatum, and left temporoparietal junction.
“showed age-related changes in right medial striatum (MNI: 12, 2, 8), left medial striatum (MNI: -13, 17, 8), and left temporoparietal junction (MNI: -55, -42, 23; Fig. 4 B ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown data§ Structural Connectivity Analyses. · p. 9The tract strength measure was not normally distributed.
“tract strength values are nonnormally distributed, so nonparametric correlations are most appropriate”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2Delay discounting rates decline with age.
“Numerous studies have shown that rates of delay discounting measured in these tasks decline with age”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2Impulsivity is multidimensional and includes at least three separate components: acting without thinking, impatience, and sensation or novelty seeking.
“Impulsivity can be broken down into at least three independent components: acting without thinking, impatience, and sensation/novelty seeking (6, 8, 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2Explicitly instructed future orientation increases activity in the brain's executive control network.
“( ii ) increased activity in the brain ' s executive control network (30).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2Striatal activity is higher when participants see immediate rewards than when they see preference-matched delayed rewards.
“Luo et al. (23) showed that striatal activity is greater when participants are presented with immediate rewards versus preference-matched delayed rewards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Luo et al. (23)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2More patient behavior may come from control processes that shift attention away from immediate rewards or emphasize future goals.
“more patient behavior may result from control processes that bias attention away from immediate rewards and/or emphasize the importance of future goals (24, 25).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2Individual differences in future orientation are associated with more patient choices.
“individual differences in future orientation are associated with more patient choices (1, 21, 26).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2Delay discounting recruits corticostriatal circuitry.
“Neuroimaging studies have consistently shown that delay discounting recruits corticostriatal circuitry (19).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2More impatient behavior can result from oversensitivity to immediate rewards.
“more impatient behavior can result from oversensitivity to immediate rewards (21).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2People are more impatient when an immediate option is available than when both options are delayed.
“people are more impatient when an immediate option is present compared with when both options are in the future (22).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Results · p. 4Control is specifically necessary for consideration of prospective future outcomes.
“Control is believed to be specifically necessary for consideration of prospective future outcomes (29)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Significance · p. 3In adults, frontostriatal tracts predict lower delay discounting, while subcorticostriatal tracts predict higher delay discounting.
“we recently showed that frontostriatal tracts predicted decreased delay discounting, whereas subcorticostriatal tracts predicted increased delay discounting in adults (21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Results · p. 5These results are consistent with a recent large-scale study showing that adolescents valued the same objective monetary rewards more than adults, but this did not explain their increased impatient behavior.
“Together, these results are consistent with a recent large-scale study on adolescent discounting (49), which showed that, although the adolescents valued the same objective monetary rewards more than adults, this did not explain their increased impatient behavior on the intertemporal choice task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ Results · p. 5DICE values for all striatal segments were high and satisfactory (between 0.32 and 0.59), except for SMA and PCC (DICE < 0.05).
“The DICE values obtained for all striatal segments were high and satisfactory (between 0.32 and 0.59), except for the supplementary motor area (SMA) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) (DICE < 0.05; Table S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity · p. 2Striatal circuits are divided into a ventral valuation network and a dorsal control network.
“striatal circuits are divided into two networks: a ventral valuation network that is involved in representing the incentive value of the different options, and a dorsal control network that is involved in maintaining future goals and inhibiting prepotent responses (18, 24).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Significance · p. 2Relative future orientation, not sensitivity to immediate rewards, determines adolescent impatience.
“Our results suggest that relative future orientation, not sensitivity to immediate rewards, determines adolescent impatience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Results · p. 6The mediation analysis supports a pathway in which age-related increase in dlPFC-medial striatum tract integrity leads to increased negative functional coupling between dlPFC and medial striatum during larger, later versus smaller, sooner choices, which in turn leads to less impulsive decision making.
“As such, the mediation analysis supports the hypotheses that an increase in dlPFC -medial striatum tract integrity with age leads to increased negative functional coupling between dlPFC and the medial striatum during LL versus SS choices, which finally leads to less impulsive decision making.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · p. 7 · hedged
“That is, our data suggest that there is an increase in white matter connectivity strength with age, which in turn allows for increased efficiency in the inhibitory interaction between right dlPFC and striatum, potentially underlying the observed reduction of impatience with age.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The serial mediation model's causal ordering from age through structural connectivity and functional connectivity to discounting is valid.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · p. 7 · hedged
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Significance · p. 3Neurodevelopmental models propose that an early-developing valuation system and a later-maturing cognitive control system explain increased adolescent impulsivity.
“Neurodevelopmental models hypothesize that the different rates of maturation of the valuation and control networks account for increased impulsivity in adolescence. These models propose that there is a relatively early developing valuation system during adolescence, followed by a more slowly maturing cognitive control system (32, 33).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ Behavioral Measures and Self-Report. · p. 9Pubertal status data from a subset of participants showed no significant relations to task behavior or neural measures.
“We collected data on pubertal status on a subset of our participants, but these did not reveal any significant relations to task behavior or neural measures (see SI Materials and Methods for more details).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ MR Data Acquisition and Preprocessing. · p. 9Age was uncorrelated with the count of interpolated volumes (r = 0.02, P = 0.89).
“There was no correlation between age and number of interpolated volumes ( r = 0.02, P = 0.89; Fig. S3)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 7Specificity analyses suggest that the right dlPFC tract is associated with goal-oriented valuation, whereas the IFG tract is involved in inhibiting prepotent responses based on external cues.
“That is, our specificity analyses suggest that the right dlPFC tract is associated with goal-oriented valuation, whereas the IFG tract is involved in inhibiting prepotent responses (based on external cues).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ Discussion · p. 7There may be an age-related increase in the specificity of the different striatal tracts.
“In line with the interactive specialization account of neurodevelopment (69), this suggests that there may be an age-related increase in the specificity of the different striatal tracts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ Behavioral Measures and Self-Report. · p. 9There were no correlations between IQ and log k.
“Second, we found that there were also no correlations between IQ and log k ( r = 23, P = 0.46).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ MR Data Acquisition and Preprocessing. · p. 9Motion is known to cause problems for connectivity analyses.
“Given the known problems of motion for connectivity analyses (90), we used ArtRepair software to correct for excessive movement (91).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE (2012) Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage 59(3):2142 -2154. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 7This striatal organization allows for at least a tripartite functional division and introduces a role for context-dependent modulation of more basic inhibitory and affect-related processes.
“This organizational structure allows for at least a tripartite functional division and introduces a role for context-dependent modulation of the more basic inhibitory and affect-related processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Results · p. 6The structural development of the right dlPFC striatal tract is specifically related to delay discounting, or impatience, but not to motor inhibition.
“In sum, these analyses suggest that the structural development of the right dlPFC striatal tract is specifically related to the processes involved in delay discounting (impatience) but not motor inhibition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown data§ Structural Connectivity Analyses. · p. 9The tractography maps were judged successful and acceptable for analysis by visual inspection.
“Visual inspection ensured that tractography maps were successful and acceptable for further analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ Behavioral Measures and Self-Report. · p. 8Adding the inverse temperature function as a covariate of no interest did not change any of the reported results.
“Adding the inverse temperature function as a covariate of no interest to our regression models did not change any of the reported results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ Discussion · p. 7Probabilistic tractography and psychophysiological interaction analysis cannot resolve the direction of connectivity.
“Of course, both probabilistic tractography and PPI are in principle unable to resolve the direction of connectivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ Structural Connectivity Analyses. · p. 9No participants were excluded because of excessive head motion in the diffusion data (threshold 1 voxel/TR).
“None of the participants had to be rejected (threshold for movement was 1 voxel/TR).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ Behavioral Measures and Self-Report. · p. 9There was no relationship between age and IQ.
“First, we established that there was no relationship between age and IQ ( r = 0.16, P = 0.72).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ MR Data Acquisition and Preprocessing. · p. 9In this sample, the number of interpolated volumes per subject did not exceed eight.
“No more than eight (median, 0; mean, 1.1) of the volumes were interpolated within any subject.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ Structural Connectivity Analyses. · p. 9Dual-fiber models account for crossing fibers and therefore produce more reliable results than single-fiber models.
“Dual-fiber models account for crossing fibers and thus yield more reliable results compared with single-fiber models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Discussion · p. 7The dorsolateral striatum is predominantly connected to sensorimotor-related regions, the ventromedial part receives visceral-related afferents, and intermediate striatal areas receive higher-order associational information.
“The dorsolateral striatum predominantly connected to sensorimotor-related regions, the ventromedial part collects visceralrelated afferents, and striatal areas lying between these extremes receive higher order ' associational ' information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitation§ Behavioral Measures and Self-Report. · p. 8All regressions involving the discount rate were robust to account for possible outliers.
“To take into account the effect of possible outliers, all regressions with the discount rate were robust [using the robustbase package in R (76)].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Todorov V, Filzmoser P (2009) An object-oriented framework for robust multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 32(3):1 -47. source
Not checked in the free run.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Choices follow a hyperbolic discount function.
“assuming a hyperbolic discount function”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The choice function assumes each individual chooses the option with the highest subjective value with highest probability.
“The choice function assumed that each individual will choose the option with the highest subjective value (which in many cases could be SS choice) with highest probability.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The inverse temperature parameter represents response noise.
“The inverse temperature is a free parameter in the choice model that represents response noise.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Developmental changes in structural connectivity indicate the functional effectiveness of axonal connections.
“it can be assumed that developmental changes in structural connectivity provide information about the functional effectiveness of axonal connections.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Age-related differences observed cross-sectionally in connectivity and behavior reflect developmental change over adolescence.
“Process model linking age related differences in brain structure, function, and behavior.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The serial mediation model's causal ordering from age through structural connectivity and functional connectivity to discounting is valid.
“We generated a serial mediator model that tries to capture the relation between age and discounting with two sequential mediators: structural and functional connectivity with the right dlPFC (Fig. 5).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In van den Bos et al. (2015), choices to delay gratification were associated with greater self-reported future orientation and increased engagement of frontoparietal control circuitry, but not with variation in self-reported hedonism.
“choices to delay gratification in the decision task were associated with greater self-reported future orientation and increased engagement of frontoparietal control circuitry, but not with variation in self reported hedonism.”
From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as van den Bos et al., 2015
The Results (pp. 4–5) link more patient choices to greater self-reported future orientation and report greater prefrontal and parietal activation for larger, later choices. Present hedonism was not significantly associated with discount rates in the unadjusted analysis, but it was significantly associated after controlling for age (Results, p. 4). The unqualified claim that choices were not associated with variation in hedonism therefore overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRecent connectivity analyses have demonstrated that increases in control behaviors across adolescence are associated with an increase in connectivity between striatal and prefrontal regions.
“Recent connectivity analyses have demonstrated that increases in control behaviors across adolescence are associated with an increase in connectivity between striatal and prefrontal regions (van den Bos et al., 2015, van Duijvenvoorde et al., 2015a, Vink et al., 2014).”
From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as van den Bos et al., 2015
In van den Bos et al. (2015), improvements in frontostriatal connectivity mediated the link between age and willingness to wait for a larger reward.
“improvements in frontostriatal connectivity mediated the link between age and willingness to wait for a larger reward.”
From The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation (2016) · cites this paper as van den Bos et al., 2015
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentt(47) = -0.92reported p = .83 · recomputed p = .362
“t (47) = -0.92, p = .83”
The paper states a correction for multiple tests
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Left and right vlPFC correlations are reversed in Table 1
MinorThe text assigns r = -0.48 to the right vlPFC and r = -0.37 to the left, whereas Table 1 assigns those values to the left and right, respectively.
“Similar trends were found for the right ( r = -0.48, P = 0.007) and left ( r = -0.37, P = 0.049) vlPFC.”
“| Left | 0.10 | - 0.48** | - 0.13 | | Right | - 0.47*** | - 0.37* | - 0.18 |”
Cites
(2013) · Cited by 44,563 · see citing works
Power, J. D., Barnes, K. A., Snyder, A. Z., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018 · Cited by 7,429 · see citing works
The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations
Spear, L. P. (2000) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00014-2 · Cited by 5,433 · see citing works
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583 · see citing works
The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging
Haber, S. N., & Knutson, B. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.129 · Cited by 3,718 · see citing works
A self‐report measure of pubertal status: Reliability, validity and initial norms
Petersen, A. C., Crockett, L., Richards, M., & Boxer, A. (1988) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/bf01537962 · Cited by 3,129 · see citing works
Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1271 · Cited by 2,935 · see citing works
Synaptic density in human frontal cortex —Developmental changes and effects of aging
Peter R., H. (1979) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(79)90349-4 · Cited by 2,645 · see citing works
Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271 · Cited by 2,520 · see citing works
Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility
Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3313 · Cited by 2,507 · see citing works
White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI
Jones, D. K., Knösche, T. R., & Turner, R. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.081 · Cited by 2,479 · see citing works
Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging
Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., Woolrich, M. W., Smith, S. M., Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A. M., Boulby, P. A., Barker, G. J., Sillery, E. L., Sheehan, K., Ciccarelli, O., et al. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1075 · Cited by 2,330 · see citing works
Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation
Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118482 · Cited by 2,305 · see citing works
Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents.
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x · Cited by 2,253 · see citing works
Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2015) · Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_2 · Cited by 2,147 · see citing works
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States, 2009
Eaton, D. K., Kann, L. K., Kinchen, S., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Hawkins, J., Harris, W. A., Lowry, R., McManus, T., Chyen, D., et al. (2010) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e661322010-001 · Cited by 1,753 · see citing works
Structural magnetic resonance imaging of the adolescent brain
GIEDD, J. N. (2004) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1308.009 · Cited by 1,610 · see citing works
Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes
de Wit, H. (2009) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00129.x · Cited by 1,415 · see citing works
Risk Taking in Adolescence: New Perspectives From Brain and Behavioral Science
Steinberg, L. (2007) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00475.x · Cited by 1,362 · see citing works
Immature Frontal Lobe Contributions to Cognitive Control in Children
Bunge, S. A., Dudukovic, N. M., Thomason, M. E., Vaidya, C. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00583-9 · Cited by 1,291 · see citing works
How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning
Nurmi, J. (1991) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/0273-2297(91)90002-6 · Cited by 1,259 · see citing works
Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting
Steinberg, L., Graham, S., O’Brien, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., & Banich, M. (2009) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01244.x · Cited by 1,237 · see citing works
Putting a spin on the dorsal-ventral divide of the striatum
Voorn, P., Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J., Groenewegen, H. J., Robbins, T. W., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2004) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.06.006 · Cited by 1,188 · see citing works
Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison
Green, L., Fry, A. F., & Myerson, J. (1994) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00610.x · Cited by 1,165 · see citing works
The Teenage Brain: Sensitivity to Social Evaluation
Somerville, L. H. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721413476512 · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
Neurocognitive endophenotypes of impulsivity and compulsivity: Towards dimensional psychiatry
Robbins, T. W., Gillan, C. M., Smith, D. G., de Wit, S., & Ersche, K. D. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.009 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
Madden, G. J., Petry, N. M., Badger, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (1997) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/1064-1297.5.3.256 · Cited by 911 · see citing works
Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.026 · Cited by 871 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Control is believed to be specifically necessary for consideration of prospective future outcomes (29), and it is future orientation that appears to underlie age-related changes in impatience.”
BackgroundGitelman, D. R., Penny, W. D., Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00058-2 · Cited by 799 · see citing works
Spear, L. P. (2013) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.05.006 · Cited by 744 · see citing works
Beyond simple models of self-control to circuit-based accounts of adolescent behavior
Casey, B. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015156 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Interactive Specialization: A domain-general framework for human functional brain development?
Johnson, M. H. (2011) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2010.07.003 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
The Teenage Brain: Peer Influences on Adolescent Decision Making
Albert, D., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412471347 · Cited by 713 · see citing works
A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling
Reynolds, B. (2006) · Behavioural Pharmacology · doi:10.1097/fbp.0b013e3280115f99 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice
Figner, B., Knoch, D., Johnson, E. J., Krosch, A. R., Lisanby, S. H., Fehr, E., & Weber, E. U. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2516 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
The neural mechanisms of inter-temporal decision-making: understanding variability
Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.002 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
Adolescent risk taking, impulsivity, and brain development: Implications for prevention
Romer, D. (2010) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.20442 · Cited by 691 · see citing works
Barkley, R. A., Edwards, G., Laneri, M., Fletcher, K., & Metevia, L. (2001) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1012233310098 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Developmental neurobiology of cognitive control and motivational systems.
Somerville, L. H., & Casey, B. (2010) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.01.006 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Intertemporal choice – toward an integrative framework
Berns, G. S., Laibson, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.011 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Frontostriatal maturation predicts cognitive control failure to appetitive cues in adolescents
Somerville, L. H., Hare, T., & Casey, B. J. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21572 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
STOP-IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigm
Verbruggen, F., Logan, G. D., & Stevens, M. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.2.479 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance--United States 1997
(1998) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e371412004-001 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Frontostriatal Microstructure Modulates Efficient Recruitment of Cognitive Control
Liston, C., Watts, R., Tottenham, N., Davidson, M. C., Niogi, S., Ulug, A. M., & Casey, B. J. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj003 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Risk taking in adolescence: A decision-making perspective
Furby, L., & Marom, T. (1992) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/0273-2297(92)90002-j · Cited by 460 · see citing works
A meta-analysis on age differences in risky decision making: Adolescents versus children and adults.
Defoe, I. N., Dubas, J. S., Figner, B., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038088 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Growth of white matter in the adolescent brain: Myelin or axon?
Paus, T. (2010) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.002 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
A neural mechanism mediating the impact of episodic prospection on farsighted decisions
Benoit, R. G., Gilbert, S. J., & Burgess, P. W. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6559-10.2011 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Adolescent impulsivity phenotypes characterized by distinct brain networks
the IMAGEN Consortium, Whelan, R., Conrod, P. J., Poline, J.-B., Lourdusamy, A., Banaschewski, T., Barker, G. J., Bellgrove, M. A., Büchel, C., Byrne, M., et al. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3092 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
An Object-Oriented Framework for Robust Multivariate Analysis
Todorov, V., & Filzmoser, P. (2009) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v032.i03 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Evolutionary economics of mental time travel?
Boyer, P. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.003 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
The medial prefrontal cortex and the emergence of self-conscious emotion in adolescence
Somerville, L. H., Jones, R. M., Ruberry, E. J., Dyke, J. P., Glover, G., & Casey, B. J. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613475633 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Does delay discounting play an etiological role in smoking or is it a consequence of smoking?
Audrain-McGovern, J., Rodriguez, D., Epstein, L. H., Cuevas, J., Rodgers, K., & Wileyto, E. P. (2009) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.12.019 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
STANDARDIZATION OF PROGRESSIVE MATRICES, 1938
RAVEN, J. C. (1941) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1941.tb00316.x · Cited by 389 · see citing works
The Development of Selective Inhibitory Control Across the Life Span
Bedard, A.-C., Nichols, S., Barbosa, J. A., Schachar, R., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (2002) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2101_5 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Methods and Software for fMRI Analysis of Clinical Subjects
Mazaika, P. K., Hoeft, F., Glover, G. H., & Reiss, A. L. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(09)70238-1 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Dual processes in decision making and developmental neuroscience: A fuzzy-trace model
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2011) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.004 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Tziortzi, A. C., Haber, S. N., Searle, G. E., Tsoumpas, C., Long, C. J., Shotbolt, P., Douaud, G., Jbabdi, S., Behrens, T. E. J., Rabiner, E. A., et al. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs397 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Abortion surveillance--United States, 1999.
Elam–Evans, L. D., Strauss, L. T., Herndon, J. L., Parker, W. Y., Whitehead, S. J., & Berg, C. J. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Longitudinal Growth Curves of Brain Function Underlying Inhibitory Control through Adolescence
Ordaz, S. J., Foran, W., Velanova, K., & Luna, B. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1741-13.2013 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Pfeifer, J. H., & Allen, N. B. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.011 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Executive functions in adolescence: inferences from brain and behavior
Crone, E. A. (2009) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00918.x · Cited by 298 · see citing works
The Teenage Brain: Surging Hormones—Brain-Behavior Interactions During Puberty
Peper, J. S., & Dahl, R. E. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412473755 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Connectivity-based segregation of the human striatum predicts personality characteristics
Cohen, M. X., Schoene‐Bake, J., Elger, C. E., & Weber, B. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2228 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Different Forms of Self-Control Share a Neurocognitive Substrate
Tabibnia, G., Monterosso, J. R., Baicy, K., Aron, A. R., Poldrack, R. A., Chakrapani, S., Lee, B., & London, E. D. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2859-10.2011 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Adolescents, adults and rewards: Comparing motivational neurocircuitry recruitment using fMRI
Bjork, J. M., Smith, A. R., Chen, G., & Hommer, D. W. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011440 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Christakou, A., Brammer, M., & Rubia, K. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.067 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Romer, D., Duckworth, A. L., Sznitman, S., & Park, S. (2010) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-010-0171-8 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
The triadic model perspective for the study of adolescent motivated behavior
Ernst, M. (2014) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2014.01.006 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
The Teenage Brain: Sensitivity to Rewards
Galván, A. (2013) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721413480859 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Hutcherson, C. A., Plassmann, H., Gross, J. J., & Rangel, A. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6387-11.2012 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Is a bird in the hand worth two in the future? The neuroeconomics of intertemporal decision-making
Tobias Kalenscher, A., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2007) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.11.004 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Response inhibition and ADHD traits: Correlates and heritability in a community sample
Crosbie, J., Arnold, P., Paterson, A., Swanson, J., Dupuis, A., Li, X., Shan, J., Goodale, T., Tam, C., Strug, L. J., et al. (2013) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-012-9693-9 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Daniel, T. O., Stanton, C. M., & Epstein, L. H. (2013) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.07.010 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Olson, E. A., Hooper, C. J., Collins, P. F., & Luciana, M. M. (2007) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.016 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Adolescents prefer more immediate rewards when in the presence of their peers
O'Brien, L., Albert, D., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2011) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00738.x · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Olson, E. A., Collins, P. F., Hooper, C. J., Muetzel, R., Lim, K. O., & Luciana, M. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21107 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
van den Bos, W., Rodriguez, C. A., Schweitzer, J. B., & McClure, S. M. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4105-13.2014 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationForstmann, B. U., Keuken, M. C., Jahfari, S., Bazin, P., Neumann, J., Schäfer, A., Anwander, A., & Turner, R. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.044 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Scheres, A., Tontsch, C., Thoeny, A. L., & Kaczkurkin, A. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.10.033 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
TOWARDS A GENERAL MODEL OF TEMPORAL DISCOUNTING
van den Bos, W., & McClure, S. M. (2013) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.6 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationImpulsive Action but Not Impulsive Choice Determines Problem Gambling Severity
Brevers, D., Cleeremans, A., Verbruggen, F., Bechara, A., Kornreich, C., Verbanck, P., & Noël, X. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050647 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Berkman, E. T., Burklund, L., & Lieberman, M. D. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.084 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Peper, J. S., Mandl, R. C. W., Braams, B. R., de Water, E., Heijboer, A. C., Koolschijn, P. C. M. P., & Crone, E. A. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs163 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Effects of anonymous peer observation on adolescents’ preference for immediate rewards
Weigard, A., Chein, J., Albert, D., Smith, A., & Steinberg, L. (2014) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12099 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Soreni, N., Crosbie, J., Ickowicz, A., & Schachar, R. (2009) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054708326110 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Vink, M., Zandbelt, B. B., Gladwin, T., Hillegers, M., Hoogendam, J. M., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Du Plessis, S., & Kahn, R. S. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22483 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Neural representation of expected value in the adolescent brain
Barkley-Levenson, E., & Galván, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319762111 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Training Self-Control: A Domain-General Translational Neuroscience Approach
Berkman, E. T., Graham, A. M., & Fisher, P. A. (2012) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00248.x · Cited by 105 · see citing works
LUO, S. H., Ainslie, G. W., Giragosian, L., & Monterosso, J. R. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4261-09.2009 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Steinbeis, N., Haushofer, J., Fehr, E., & Singer, T. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu167 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
de Water, E., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Scheres, A. (2014) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12245 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Delay discounting by adolescents experimenting with cigarette smoking
Reynolds, B., & Fields, S. (2012) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03644.x · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Lamm, C., Benson, B. E., Guyer, A. E., Pérez‐Edgar, K. E., Fox, N. A., Pine, D. S., & Monique Ernst, D. (2014) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.12.003 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Evidence for Segregated and Integrative Connectivity Patterns in the Human Basal Ganglia
Draganski, B., Kherif, F., Klöppel, S., Cook, P. A., Alexander, D. C., Parker, G. J. M., Deichmann, R., Ashburner, J., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1486-08.2008 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
New perspectives on self-control development: Highlighting the role of intentional inhibition
Schel, M. A., Scheres, A., & Crone, E. A. (2014) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.022 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Higher order strategic gist reasoning in adolescence.
Chapman, S. B., Gamino, J. F., & Mudar, R. A. (2011) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/13493-005 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
A fuzzy trace theory of adolescent risk taking: Beyond self-control and sensation seeking.
Chick, C. F., & Reyna, V. F. (2011) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/13493-013 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Neural Mechanisms of Social Reorientation across Adolescence
van den Bos, W. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2667-13.2013 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation
Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., Icenogle, G., Duell, N., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010 · Cited by 867 · see citing works
“…between a smaller immediate reward and a larger delayed reward—are explained by variations in self-reported “present hedonism” (i.e., reward sensitivity) and “future orientation” (i.e., impulse control) and engagement of neural regions and networks during decision making (van den Bos et al., 2015).”
Beyond stereotypes of adolescent risk taking: Placing the adolescent brain in developmental context
Römer, D., Reyna, V. F., & Satterthwaite, T. D. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.007 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Pfeifer, J. H., & Berkman, E. T. (2018) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12279 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Neural Perspectives on Cognitive Control Development during Childhood and Adolescence
Crone, E. A., & Steinbeis, N. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.003 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Neural substrates of early executive function development
Fiske, A., & Holmboe, K. (2019) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2019.100866 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
The neuroscience of adolescent decision-making
Hartley, C. A., & Somerville, L. H. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.09.004 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Crone, E. A., van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., & Peper, J. S. (2016) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12502 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
van den Bos, W., & Hertwig, R. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep40962 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Charting the expansion of strategic exploratory behavior during adolescence.
Somerville, L. H., Sasse, S. F., Garrad, M. C., Drysdale, A. T., Akar, N. A., Insel, C., & Wilson, R. C. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000250 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Stevens, M. C. G. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.027 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Achterberg, M., Peper, J. S., van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., Mandl, R. C. W., & Crone, E. A. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3459-15.2016 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Dissociated neural substrates underlying impulsive choice and impulsive action
Wang, Q., Chen, C., Cai, Y., Li, S., Zhao, X. Q., Li, Z., Zhang, H., Liu, J., Chen, C., & Xue, G. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.010 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Understanding the effects of time perspective: A meta-analysis testing a self-regulatory framework.
Baird, H. M., Webb, T. L., Sirois, F. M., & Miller, J. G. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000313 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Cao, Z., Bennett, M., Orr, C., Icke, I., Banaschewski, T., Barker, G. J., Bokde, A. L. W., Bromberg, U., Büchel, C., Quinlan, E. B., et al. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24370 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Myelin plasticity and behaviour — connecting the dots
Kaller, M. S., Lazari, A., Blanco‐Duque, C., Sampaio‐Baptista, C., & Johansen‐Berg, H. (2017) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2017.09.014 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Hampton, W. H., Hanik, I. M., & Olson, I. R. (2019) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.02.005 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Development of corticostriatal connectivity constrains goal-directed behavior during adolescence
Insel, C., Kastman, E. K., Glenn, C. R., & Somerville, L. H. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01369-8 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Goddings, A., Roalf, D. R., Lebel, C. A., & Tamnes, C. K. (2021) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101008 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Adolescent sleep and the foundations of prefrontal cortical development and dysfunction
Anastasiades, P. G., de Vivo, L., Bellesi, M., & Jones, M. W. (2022) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102338 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Neurocognitive Development of Motivated Behavior: Dynamic Changes across Childhood and Adolescence
Gee, D. G., Bath, K. G., Johnson, C. M., Meyer, H. C., Murty, V. P., van den Bos, W., & Hartley, C. A. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1674-18.2018 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Harden, K. P., Kretsch, N., Mann, F. D., Herzhoff, K., Tackett, J. L., Steinberg, L., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.12.007 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Multiple accounts of adolescent impulsivity
Steinberg, L., & Chein, J. M. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1509732112 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Crone, E. A., Achterberg, M., Dobbelaar, S., Euser, S., van den Bulk, B. G., van der Meulen, M., van Drunen, L., Wierenga, L. M., Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2020) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100805 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Khurana, A., Römer, D., Betancourt, L. M., & Hurt, H. (2018) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-018-0891-9 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Developmental perspectives on risky and impulsive choice
Rosenbaum, G. M., & Hartley, C. A. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2018.0133 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Executive functioning and substance use in adolescence: Neurobiological and behavioral perspectives
Kim‐Spoon, J., Kahn, R. E., Lauharatanahirun, N., Deater-Deckard, K. D., Bickel, W. K., Chiu, P. H., & King‐Casas, B. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.020 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Valence biases in reinforcement learning shift across adolescence and modulate subsequent memory
Rosenbaum, G. M., Grassie, H. L., & Hartley, C. A. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.64620 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Braams, B. R., Davidow, J. Y., & Somerville, L. H. (2018) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12717 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Adolescents in Peer Groups Make More Prudent Decisions When a Slightly Older Adult Is Present
Silva, K., Chein, J. M., & Steinberg, L. D. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615620379 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Dissociable frontostriatal white matter connectivity underlies reward and motor impulsivity
Hampton, W. H., Alm, K. H., Venkatraman, V., Nugiel, T., & Olson, I. R. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.021 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Episodic future thinking reduces temporal discounting in healthy adolescents
Bromberg, U., Lobatcheva, M., & Peters, J. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188079 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Reiter, A. M. F., Moutoussis, M., Vanes, L. D., Kievit, R., Bullmore, E. T., Goodyer, I. M., Fonagy, P., Jones, P. B., Bullmore, E. T., NSPN Principle Investigators, et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23671-2 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Combined effects of peer presence, social cues, and rewards on cognitive control in adolescents
Breiner, K., Li, A., Cohen, A. O., Steinberg, L. D., Bonnie, R. J., Scott, E. S., Taylor‐Thompson, K., Rudolph, M. D., Chein, J. M., Richeson, J. A., et al. (2018) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.21599 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Abnormal frontostriatal tracts in young male tobacco smokers
Yuan, K., Yu, D., Zhao, M., Li, M., Wang, R., Li, Y., Manza, P., Kojori, E. S., Wiers, C. E., Wang, G., et al. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.046 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Sherman, L. E., Steinberg, L. D., & Chein, J. M. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.05.007 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Trauma and Grief Component Therapy for Adolescents
Saltzman, W. R., Layne, C. M., Pynoos, R. S., Olafson, E., Kaplow, J. B., & Boat, B. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316443132 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Limbic Intrinsic Connectivity in Depressed and High-Risk Youth
Singh, M. K., Leslie, S. M., Packer, M. M., Weisman, E. F., & Gotlib, I. H. (2018) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2018.06.017 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
The role of the dorsal striatum in choice impulsivity
Kim, B. S., & Im, H. (2018) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13961 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Striato-cortical tracts predict 12-h abstinence-induced lapse in smokers
Yuan, K., Zhao, M., Yu, D., Manza, P., Volkow, N. D., Wang, G., & Tian, J. (2018) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0182-x · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Schüller, C. B., Kuhn, J., Jessen, F., & Hu, X. (2019) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.1080/00952990.2018.1557675 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Development of MPFC function mediates shifts in self-protective behavior provoked by social feedback
Yoon, L., Somerville, L. H., & Kim, H. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05553-2 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
The Correlation between the Frontostriatal Network and Impulsivity in Internet Gaming Disorder
Kim, J.-Y., Chun, J., Park, C.-H., Cho, H., Choi, J., Yang, S., Ahn, K. J., & Kim, D. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37702-4 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Marvin, C. B., Tedeschi, E., & Daphna Shohamy, A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.08.003 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Lloyd, A., McKay, R., Sebastian, C. L., & Balsters, J. H. (2021) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13075 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
The future and me: Imagining the future and the future self in adolescent decision making
Mccue, R., McCormack, T., McElnay, J., Alto, A., & Feeney, A. (2019) · Cognitive development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.04.001 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Brown, V. M., Wilson, J., Hallquist, M. N., Szanto, K., & Dombrovski, A. Y. (2020) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-020-0632-0 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Peper, J. S., Braams, B. R., Blankenstein, N. E., Bos, M. G. N., & Crone, E. A. (2018) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13063 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges
Dennison, J. B., Sazhin, D., & Smith, D. V. (2022) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1589 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Goal-directed learning in adolescence: neurocognitive development and contextual influences
Wilbrecht, L., & Davidow, J. Y. (2024) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-023-00783-w · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Transforming brain signals related to value evaluation and self‐control into behavioral choices
Zha, R., Bu, J., Wei, Z., Han, L., Zhang, P., Ren, J., Li, J., Wang, Y., Yang, L., Vollstädt‐Klein, S., et al. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24379 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Brain functional connectome-based prediction of individual decision impulsivity
Cai, H., Chen, J., Liu, S., Zhu, J., & Yu, Y. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.022 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Lin, Y., & Feng, T. (2024) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-023-01148-7 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Brahmbhatt, K., Hilty, D. M., Hah, M., Han, J., Angkustsiri, K., & Schweitzer, J. B. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.025 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationData-driven brain network models differentiate variability across language tasks
Bansal, K., Medaglia, J. D., Bassett, D. S., Vettel, J. M., & Muldoon, S. F. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006487 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
The link between cognitive control and decision-making across child and adolescent development
Steinbeis, N., & Crone, E. A. (2016) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.009 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
I know better! Emerging metacognition allows adolescents to ignore false advice
Moses-Payne, M. E., Habicht, J., Bowler, A., Steinbeis, N., & Hauser, T. U. (2021) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13101 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
de Water, E., Mies, G. W., Figner, B., Yoncheva, Y. N., van den Bos, W., Castellanos, F. X., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Scheres, A. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.013 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Anandakumar, J., Mills, K. L., Earl, E., Irwin, L., Miranda-Domínguez, Ó., Demeter, D. V., Walton-Weston, A., Karalunas, S. L., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2018) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2018.07.003 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Sex differences and brain development during puberty and adolescence
Peper, J. S., Burke, S., & Wierenga, L. M. (2020) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-64123-6.00003-5 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Developing developmental cognitive neuroscience: From agenda setting to hypothesis testing
van den Bos, W., & Eppinger, B. (2015) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.011 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Developmental asymmetries in learning to adjust to cooperative and uncooperative environments
Westhoff, B., Molleman, L., Viding, E. M., van den Bos, W., & van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-78546-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Links between autobiographical memory richness and temporal discounting in older adults
Lempert, K. M., MacNear, K. A., Wolk, D. A., & Kable, J. W. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63373-1 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Dissociable fronto-striatal functional networks predict choice impulsivity
Wang, Q., Lv, C., He, Q., & Xue, G. (2020) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-020-02128-0 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
The computational basis of following advice in adolescents
Buritica, J. M. R., Heekeren, H. R., & van den Bos, W. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.019 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Casey, B. J., Simmons, C., Somerville, L. H., & Baskin-sommers, A. R. (2021) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-113250 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Pubertal testosterone correlates with adolescent impatience and dorsal striatal activity
Laube, C., Lorenz, R. C., & van den Bos, W. (2019) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100749 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Hu, Y., Ji, G., Li, G., Manza, P., Zhang, W., Wang, J., Lv, G., He, Y., Zhang, Z., Yuan, K., et al. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa294 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Computational neuroscience across the lifespan: Promises and pitfalls
van den Bos, W., Bruckner, R., Nassar, M. R., Mata, R., & Eppinger, B. (2017) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.09.008 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Motivation for the greater good: neural mechanisms of overcoming costs
Soutschek, A., & Tobler, P. N. (2018) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.025 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Holmes, C. J., Barton, A. W., MacKillop, J., Galván, A., Owens, M. M., McCormick, M. J., Yu, T., Beach, S. R. H., Brody, G. H., & Sweet, L. H. (2018) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.03.003 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Parr, A. C., Calabro, F. J., Tervo‐Clemmens, B., Larsen, B., Foran, W., & Luna, B. (2022) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101100 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Zhao, X., Wang, Y., & Maes, J. H. R. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105347 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Huang, Y., Hu, P., & Li, X. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep42631 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Guo, Y., Chen, Z., & Feng, T. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.021 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Old Strategies, New Environments: Reinforcement Learning on Social Media
Turner, G., Ferguson, A. M., Katiyar, T., Palminteri, S., & Orben, A. C. (2024) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.12.012 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Causal Information‐Seeking Strategies Change Across Childhood and Adolescence
Nussenbaum, K., Cohen, A. O., Davis, Z. J., Halpern, D. J., Gureckis, T. M., & Hartley, C. A. (2020) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12888 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Oguchi, M., Tanaka, S., Pan, X., Kikusui, T., Moriya‐Ito, K., Kato, S., Kobayashi, K., & Sakagami, M. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02623-y · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Meso-cortical pathway damage in cognition, apathy and gait in cerebral small vessel disease
Li, H., Jacob, M. A., Cai, M., Kessels, R. P. C., Norris, D. G., Duering, M., de Leeuw, F., & Tuladhar, A. M. (2024) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awae145 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Abraham, E., Posner, J. E., WICKRAMARATNE, P. J., Aw, N., van Dijk, M. T., Cha, J., Weissman, M. M., & Talati, A. (2020) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaa118 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-regulation in the pre-adolescent brain
Pas, P., Pol, H. E. H., Raemaekers, M. A. H., & Vink, M. (2021) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101012 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Reward Enhances Memory via Age-Varying Online and Offline Neural Mechanisms across Development
Cohen, A. O., Glover, M. M., Shen, X., Phaneuf-Hadd, C. V., Avallone, K. N., Davachi, L., & Hartley, C. A. (2022) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1820-21.2022 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Dissociable effects of age and testosterone on adolescent impatience
Laube, C., Suleiman, A. B., Johnson, M. M., Dahl, R. E., & van den Bos, W. (2017) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.03.012 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Impulsivity in unaffected adolescent biological relatives of schizophrenia patients
Ho, B., Barry, A. B., & Koeppel, J. A. (2017) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.11.008 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Pan, N., Long, Y., Qin, K., Pope, I. Z., Chen, Q., Zhu, Z., Cao, Y., Li, L., Singh, M. K., McNamara, R. K., et al. (2026) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2026.0001 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Wang, L., Jin, S., He, K., Chen, X., Ji, G., Bai, X., Xiao, G., Ma, H., & Wang, K. (2017) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.040 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Cubon, V. A., Murugavel, M., Holmes, K. W., & Dettwiler, A. (2018) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.1165 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Single caudate neurons encode temporally discounted value for formulating motivation for action
Hori, Y., Mimura, K., Nagai, Y., Fujimoto, A., Oyama, K., Kikuchi, E., Inoue, K., Takada, M., Suhara, T., Richmond, B. J., et al. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.61248 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Du, X., Liu, L., Yang, Y., Qi, X., Gao, P., Zhang, Y., Zhu, J., Du, G., Dai, S., Li, X., et al. (2017) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.753 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy improves brain connectivity in obese patients
Hu, Y., Ji, G., Li, G., Zhang, W., Wang, J., Lv, G., He, Y., Yuan, K., von Deneen, K. M., Chen, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-020-09780-w · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flayelle, M., Verbruggen, F., Schiel, J., Vögele, C., Maurage, P., & Billieux, J. (2020) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.194 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Elliott, B. L., D’Ardenne, K., Mukherjee, P., Schweitzer, J. B., & McClure, S. M. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.05.002 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationAccumbofrontal tract integrity is related to early life adversity and feedback learning
Kennedy, B. V., Hanson, J. L., Buser, N. J., van den Bos, W., Rudolph, K. D., Davidson, R. J., & Pollak, S. D. (2021) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01129-9 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Hänggi, J., Lohrey, C., Drobetz, R., Baetschmann, H., Forstmeier, S., Maercker, A. R. A., & Jäncke, L. (2016) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00307 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Su, W., Király, O., Demetrovics, Z., & Potenza, M. N. (2018) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/10784 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Wilmer, H. H., Hampton, W. H., Olino, T. M., Olson, I. R., & Chein, J. M. (2019) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsz024 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Sullivan‐Toole, H., DePasque, S., Holt-Gosselin, B., & Galván, A. (2019) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100652 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Spenser, K. A., Bull, R., Betts, L. R., & Winder, B. (2020) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100928 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Novel circuit biomarker of impulsivity and craving in male heroin-dependent individuals
Yang, W., Wang, S., Shao, Z., Yang, R., Tang, F., Luo, J., Yan, C., Zhang, J., Chen, J., Liu, J., et al. (2020) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108485 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Children perform extensive information gathering when it is not costly
Bowler, A., Habicht, J., Moses-Payne, M. E., Steinbeis, N., Moutoussis, M., & Hauser, T. U. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104535 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Garzón, B., Kurth-Nelson, Z. L., Bäckman, L., Nyberg, L. H., & Guitart‐Masip, M. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac164 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- van den Bos, W., Rodriguez, C. A., Schweitzer, J. B., & McClure, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, 14197 Berlin, Germany;
- Stanford University (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2015-06-22
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- E3765-74
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC4517266
- OpenAlex
- W2107416685
- Semantic Scholar
- 8c1c73da008d86d2fd95cb97e2a8340ebb7497c2
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 99
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 22.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (R01 091068)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091068)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- impatience, impulsivity, adolescence, frontostriatal connectivity, intertemporal choice, discounting, striatum, future orientation, developmental changes, structural connectivity, functional connectivity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Neostriatum, Young Adult, Diffusion Tensor Imaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review