Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 647

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phytoplasmas: bacteria that manipulate plants and insects

Open access
HOGENHOUT, SASKIA A., OSHIMA, KENRO, AMMAR, EL‐DESOUKY, KAKIZAWA, SHIGEYUKI, KINGDOM, HEATHER N., NAMBA, SHIGETOU·2008·Molecular Plant Pathology

Abstract

SUMMARY: Taxonomy: Superkingdom Prokaryota; Kingdom Monera; Domain Bacteria; Phylum Firmicutes (low‐G+C, Gram‐positive eubacteria); Class Mollicutes; Candidatus (Ca.) genus Phytoplasma. Host range: Ca. Phytoplasma comprises approximately 30 distinct clades based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses of ~200 phytoplasmas. Phytoplasmas are mostly dependent on insect transmission for their spread and survival. The phytoplasma life cycle involves replication in insects and plants. They infect the insect but are phloem‐limited in plants. Members of Ca. Phytoplasma asteris (16SrI group phytoplasmas) are found in 80 monocot and dicot plant species in most parts of the world. Experimentally, they can be transmitted by approximately 30, frequently polyphagous insect species, to 200 diverse plant species. Disease symptoms: In plants, phytoplasmas induce symptoms that suggest interference with plant development. Typical symptoms include: witches’ broom (clustering of branches) of developing tissues; phyllody (retrograde metamorphosis of the floral organs to the condition of leaves); virescence (green coloration of non‐green flower parts); bolting (growth of elongated stalks); formation of bunchy fibrous secondary roots; reddening of leaves and stems; generalized yellowing, decline and stunting of plants; and phloem necrosis. Phytoplasmas can be pathogenic to some insect hosts, but generally do not negatively affect the fitness of their major insect vector(s). In fact, phytoplasmas can increase fecundity and survival of insect vectors, and may influence flight behaviour and plant host preference of their insect hosts. Disease control: The most common practices are the spraying of various insecticides to control insect vectors, and removal of symptomatic plants. Phytoplasma‐resistant cultivars are not available for the vast majority of affected crops.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00472.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 647

Metadata

Authors
HOGENHOUT, S. A., OSHIMA, K., AMMAR, E., KAKIZAWA, S., KINGDOM, H. N., & NAMBA, S.
Venue
Molecular Plant Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-06-28
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
403-423
ISSN
  • 1364-3703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-6722
OpenAlex
W2165375801
Cited by
647
References
3
FWCI
33.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phytoplasmas: bacteria that manipulate plants and insects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00472.x
The paper
HOGENHOUT, S. A., OSHIMA, K., AMMAR, E., KAKIZAWA, S., KINGDOM, H. N., & NAMBA, S. (2008). Phytoplasmas: bacteria that manipulate plants and insects. Molecular Plant Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00472.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.