Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 374

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review article: 13C‐urea breath test in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection – a critical review

Gisbert, J. P., Pajares, J. M.·2004·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: The urea breath test is a non‐invasive, simple and safe test which provides excellent accuracy both for the initial diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and for the confirmation of its eradication after treatment. Some studies have found no differences between urea breath test performed under non‐fasting conditions. The simplicity, good tolerance and economy of the citric acid test meal probably make its systematic use advisable. The urea breath test protocol may be performed with relatively low doses (<100 mg) of urea: 75 mg or even 50 mg seem to be sufficient. With the most widely used protocol (with citric acid and 75 mg of urea), excellent accuracy is obtained when breath samples are collected as early as 10–15 min after urea ingestion. A unique and generally proposed cut‐off level is not possible because it has to be adapted to different factors, such as the test meal, the dose and type of urea, or the pre‐/post‐treatment setting. Fortunately, because positive and negative urea breath test results tend to cluster outside of the range between 2 and 5‰, a change in cut‐off value within this range would be expected to have little effect on clinical accuracy of the test.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02203.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 374

Metadata

Authors
Gisbert, J. P., & Pajares, J. M.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
1001-1017
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W1989131633
Cited by
374
References
44
FWCI
13.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review article: 13C‐urea breath test in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection – a critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02203.x
The paper
Gisbert, J. P., & Pajares, J. M. (2004). Review article: 13C‐urea breath test in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection – a critical review. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02203.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.