The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increasing prevalence of coeliac disease over time
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Background The number of coeliac disease diagnoses has increased in the recent past and according to screening studies, the total prevalence of the disorder is around 1%. Aim To establish whether the increased number of coeliac disease cases reflects a true rise in disease frequency. Methods The total prevalence of coeliac disease was determined in two population‐based samples representing the Finnish adult population in 1978–80 and 2000–01 and comprising 8000 and 8028 individuals, respectively. Both clinically–diagnosed coeliac disease patients and previously unrecognized cases identified by serum endomysial antibodies were taken into account. Results Only two (clinical prevalence of 0.03%) patients had been diagnosed on clinical grounds in 1978–80, in contrast to 32 (0.52%) in 2000–01. The prevalence of earlier unrecognized cases increased statistically significantly from 1.03% to 1.47% during the same period. This yields a total prevalence of coeliac disease of 1.05% in 1978–80 and 1.99% in 2000–01. Conclusions The total prevalence of coeliac disease seems to have doubled in Finland during the last two decades, and the increase cannot be attributed to the better detection rate. The environmental factors responsible for the increasing prevalence of the disorder are issues for further studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global Prevalence of Celiac Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Singh, P., Arora, A., Strand, T. A., Leffler, D. A., Catassi, C., Green, P. H., Kelly, C. P., Ahuja, V., & Makharia, G. K. (2018) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.037 · Cited by 1,743
Lebwohl, B., Sanders, D. S., & Green, P. H. R. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31796-8 · Cited by 1,065
Gut Microbiota Diversity and Human Diseases: Should We Reintroduce Key Predators in Our Ecosystem?
Mosca, A., Leclerc, M., & Hugot, J. P. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00455 · Cited by 612
The biodiversity hypothesis and allergic disease: world allergy organization position statement
Haahtela, T., Holgate, S., Pawankar, R., Akdis, C. A., Benjaponpitak, S., Caraballo, L., Demain, J., Portnoy, J., & von Hertzen, L. (2013) · World Allergy Organization Journal · doi:10.1186/1939-4551-6-3 · Cited by 426
Arasaradnam, R. P., Brown, S., Forbes, A., Fox, M. R., Hungin, P., Kelman, L., Major, G., O’Connor, M., Sanders, D. S., Sinha, R., et al. (2018) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315909 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- LOHI, S., MUSTALAHTI, K., KAUKINEN, K., LAURILA, K., COLLIN, P., RISSANEN, H., LOHI, O., BRAVI, E., GASPARIN, M., REUNANEN, A., & MÄKI, M.
- Venue
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1217-1225
- ISSN
- 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2036
- OpenAlex
- W1544004437
- Cited by
- 749
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increasing prevalence of coeliac disease over time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03502.x
- The paper
- LOHI, S., MUSTALAHTI, K., KAUKINEN, K., LAURILA, K., COLLIN, P., RISSANEN, H., LOHI, O., BRAVI, E., GASPARIN, M., REUNANEN, A., & MÄKI, M. (2007). Increasing prevalence of coeliac disease over time. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03502.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.