Cited by 59Pharmaceutical studies and practicesAnalytical Methods in PharmaceuticalsGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Clinical trial: Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of polyethylene glycol (PEG-3350) in healthy young and elderly subjects

PELHAM, R. W., NIX, L. C., CHAVIRA, R. E., CLEVELAND, M. VB., STETSON, P.·2008·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Background The pharmacokinetics of polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG‐3350) have not been fully described because of lack of a sufficiently sensitive analytical method. Aim To describe the pharmacokinetics of PEG‐3350 in humans. Methods A highly sensitive, high performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS) method was developed for PEG‐3350 in urine, plasma and faeces with quantification limits of 30 ng/mL, 100 ng/mL and 500 μg/g respectively. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetics methods were used and the effects of gender, age, renal status and dosing frequency were examined after the oral administration of 17 g to healthy volunteers. Results Peak PEG‐3350 plasma concentrations occurred at 2–4 h and declined to nonquantifiable levels usually within 18 h after single and multiple doses, with a half‐life of about 4–6 h. Steady state was reached within 5 days of dosing. Mean urinary excretion of the administered dose ranged from 0.19% to 0.25%. Age, gender or mild kidney impairment did not alter the pharmacokinetics of PEG‐3350. Mean faecal excretion of the administered dose was 93% in young subjects. Conclusions For the first time, a highly sensitive assay allowed comprehensive pharmacokinetics studies of PEG‐3350 in humans. These studies confirmed that orally administered PEG‐3350 is minimally absorbed, rapidly excreted and primarily eliminated via faeces.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03727.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In general, polymer degradation products under ~40 kDa tend toward renal elimination, though the exact threshold varies.

    “In general, polymer degradation products under ~40 kDa (the exact threshold varies) tend toward renal elimination [253].”

Authors
PELHAM, R. W., NIX, L. C., CHAVIRA, R. E., CLEVELAND, M. V., & STETSON, P.
Affiliations
Braintree Laboratories (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
PELHAM, R. W.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-06-28
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
256-265
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2019401925
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
polyethylene glycol 3350, pharmacokinetics, oral administration, urinary excretion, fecal excretion, renal dysfunction, age effects, gender effects, dosing frequency, healthy volunteers
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Polyethylene Glycols, Sex Factors, Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review