The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A procedure‐specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Summary: The PROSPECT Working Group, a collaboration of anaesthetists and surgeons, conducts systematic reviews of postoperative pain management for different surgical procedures ( http://www.postoppain.org ). Evidence‐based consensus recommendations for the effective management of postoperative pain are then developed from these systematic reviews, incorporating clinical practice observations, and transferable evidence from other relevant procedures. We present the results of a systematic review of pain and other outcomes following analgesic, anaesthetic and surgical interventions for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The evidence from this review supports the use of general anaesthesia combined with a femoral nerve block for surgery and postoperative analgesia, or alternatively spinal anaesthesia with local anaesthetic plus spinal morphine. The primary technique, together with cooling and compression techniques, should be supplemented with paracetamol and conventional non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs or COX‐2‐selective inhibitors, plus intravenous strong opioids (high‐intensity pain) or weak opioids (moderate‐ to low‐intensity pain).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
The Effect of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition on Analgesia and Spinal Fusion
Reuben, S. S., & Ekman, E. F. (2005) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.d.02283 · Cited by 107
RetractedAssessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 · Cited by 6,061
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04337-3 · Cited by 5,373
Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The CONSORT Statement
Begg, C. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030 · Cited by 3,127
Møiniche, S., Kehlet, H., & Dahl, J. B. (2002) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-200203000-00032 · Cited by 815
Self-citationThe Efficacy of Preemptive Analgesia for Acute Postoperative Pain Management: A Meta-Analysis
Ong, C. K.-S., Lirk, P., Seymour, R. A., & Jenkins, B. J. (2005) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000144428.98767.0e · Cited by 694
EFFICACY OF PERIARTICULAR MULTIMODAL DRUG INJECTION IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
BUSCH, C. A., SHORE, B. J., BHANDARI, R., GANAPATHY, S., MACDONALD, S. J., BOURNE, R. B., RORABECK, C. H., & MCCALDEN, R. W. (2006) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200605000-00005 · Cited by 512
Fowler, S. J., Symons, J., Sabato, S., & Myles, P. S. (2008) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aem373 · Cited by 507
A MULTIMODAL ANALGESIA PROTOCOL FOR TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED STUDY
VENDITTOLI, P.-A., MAKINEN, P., DROLET, P., LAVIGNE, M., FALLAHA, M., GUERTIN, M.-C., & VARIN, F. (2006) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200602000-00005 · Cited by 423
Cited by
Fowler, S. J., Symons, J., Sabato, S., & Myles, P. S. (2008) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aem373 · Cited by 507
Susceptibility to Fraud in Systematic Reviews: Lessons from the Reuben Case
Marret, E., Elia, N., Dahl, J. B., McQuay, H. J., Møiniche, S., Moore, R. A., Straube, S., & Tramèr, M. R. (2009) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e3181c14c3d · Cited by 50
Thybo, K. H., Hägi‐Pedersen, D., Wetterslev, J., Dahl, J. B., Jakobsen, J. C., Pedersen, N. A., Jakobsen, K., Bülow, H. H., Ibsen, L., Overgaard, S., et al. (2020) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aas.13496 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Fischer, H. B. J., Simanski, C. J. P., Sharp, C., Bonnet, F., Camu, F., Neugebauer, E. A. M., Rawal, N., Joshi, G. P., Schug, S. A., & Kehlet, H.
- Venue
- Anaesthesia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09-05
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1105-1123
- ISSN
- 0003-2409 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2094136715
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A procedure‐specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05565.x
- The paper
- Fischer, H. B. J., Simanski, C. J. P., Sharp, C., Bonnet, F., Camu, F., Neugebauer, E. A. M., Rawal, N., Joshi, G. P., Schug, S. A., & Kehlet, H. (2008). A procedure‐specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05565.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
