Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A MULTIMODAL ANALGESIA PROTOCOL FOR TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED STUDY

VENDITTOLI, PASCAL-ANDRE, MAKINEN, PATRICE, DROLET, PIERRE, LAVIGNE, MARTIN, FALLAHA, MICHEL, GUERTIN, MARIE-CLAUDE, VARIN, FRANCE·2006·The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although numerous methods of postoperative analgesia have been investigated in an attempt to improve pain control after total knee arthroplasty, parenteral narcotics still play a major role in postoperative pain management. Local anesthetics have the advantage of blocking pain conduction at its origin and minimizing the systemic side effects associated with postoperative narcotic use. This study was performed to evaluate the benefits and safety of a multimodal analgesia protocol that included periarticular injection of large doses of local anesthetics in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We compared morphine consumption during the first twenty-four hours after unilateral total knee arthroplasty in forty-two patients who had been randomized to receive either (1) a perioperative infiltration mixture, consisting principally of local anesthetic, and self-administered morphine or (2) self-administered morphine only. Narcotics consumption, pain control, medication-related side effects, plasma levels of the local anesthetic (ropivacaine), and postoperative rehabilitation were monitored. RESULTS: Although there was high satisfaction and good pain control in both groups, morphine consumption was significantly lower in the local analgesia group than it was in the control group (28.8 +/- 17.4 mg compared with 50.3 +/- 25.4 mg twenty-four hours after surgery, and 46.7 +/- 19.4 mg compared with 68.6 +/- 38.6 mg forty hours after surgery). Both groups achieved a similar amount of knee flexion on the fifth postoperative day. Over the five-day period after the procedure, the patients in the local analgesia group reported a total of 2.6 +/- 3.9 hours of nausea compared with 7.1 +/- 12.2 hours in the control group. No complications related to the infiltration of the local anesthetic were observed, and all plasma concentrations of the local anesthetic were below the toxic range. CONCLUSIONS: This multimodal perioperative analgesia protocol that included infiltration of a local anesthetic offered improved pain control and minimal side effects to patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Our study also confirmed the safety of the protocol.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/00004623-200602000-00005

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 423

Metadata

Authors
VENDITTOLI, P.-A., MAKINEN, P., DROLET, P., LAVIGNE, M., FALLAHA, M., GUERTIN, M.-C., & VARIN, F.
Venue
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
Published
2006-02
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
282-289
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026572108
Cited by
423
References
0
FWCI
13.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A MULTIMODAL ANALGESIA PROTOCOL FOR TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED STUDY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-200602000-00005
The paper
VENDITTOLI, P.-A., MAKINEN, P., DROLET, P., LAVIGNE, M., FALLAHA, M., GUERTIN, M.-C., & VARIN, F. (2006). A MULTIMODAL ANALGESIA PROTOCOL FOR TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED STUDY. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200602000-00005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.