Cited by 64Airway Management and Intubation TechniquesTracheal and airway disordersAnesthesia and Sedative Agents

Evaluation of the GlideScope ® for tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilisation by a semi‐rigid collar

Open access
Bathory, I., Frascarolo, P., Kern, C., Schoettker, P.·2009·Anaesthesia

Abstract

Summary: Application of cervical collars may reduce cervical spine movements but render tracheal intubation with a standard laryngoscope difficult if not impossible. We hypothesised that despite the presence of a Philadelphia Patriot ® cervical collar and with the patient’s head taped to the trolley, tracheal intubation would be possible in 50 adult patients using the GlideScope ® and its dedicated stylet. Laryngoscopy was attempted using a Macintosh laryngoscope with a size 4 blade, and the modified Cormack–Lehane grade was scored. Subsequently, laryngoscopy with the GlideScope was graded and followed by tracheal intubation. All patients’ tracheas were successfully intubated with the GlideScope. The median (IQR) intubation time was 50 s (43–61 s). The modified Cormack–Lehane grade was 3 or 4 at direct laryngoscopy. It was significantly reduced with the GlideScope (p < 0.0001), reaching grade 2a in most patients. Tracheal intubation in patients wearing a semi‐rigid collar and having their head taped to the trolley is possible with the help of the GlideScope.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06075.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indirect hyperangulated video laryngoscopy (VL) consistently provides an improved glottic view.

    “indirect hyperangulated video laryngoscopy (VL) consistently provides an improved glottic view”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Results and Table 2 (page not available in our copy) show that GlideScope views were better than direct Macintosh views in all 50 patients studied. However, the study tested one device under simulated cervical-spine immobilisation; it does not establish that indirect hyperangulated VL consistently improves glottic views across devices and settings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • C-spine immobilization consistently impairs the glottic view with DL.

    “c-spine immobilization consistently impairs the glottic view with DL”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [43]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Goutcher CM, Lochhead V. Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005; 95: 344-8.
  2. I. Bathory et al. Æ GlideScope for intubation in patients with a cervical collar 3 Heath KJ. The effect of laryngoscopy of different cervical spine immobilisation techniques. Anaesthesia 1994; 49: 843-5.
  3. Peterson GN, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Posner KL, Lee LA, Cheney FW. Management of the difficult airway: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 33-9.
  4. Manoach S, Paladino L. Manual in-line stabilization for acute airway management of suspected cervical spine injury: historical review and current questions. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2007; 50: 236-45.
  5. Santoni BG, Hindman BJ, Puttlitz CM, et al. Manual in-line stabilization increases pressures applied by the laryngoscope blade during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 24-31.
  6. Nolan JP, Wilson ME. Orotracheal intubation in patients with potential cervical spine injuries. An indication for the gum elastic bougie. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 630-3.
  7. Lennarson PJ, Smith DW, Sawin PD, Todd MM, Sato Y, Traynelis VC. Cervical spinal motion during intubation: efficacy of stabilization maneuvers in the setting of com- plete segmental instability. Journal of Neurosurgery 2001; 94: 265-70.
  8. Maharaj CH, Buckley E, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a comparison of macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes. Anesthesiology 2007; 107: 53-9.
  9. Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airway- scope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008; 101: 723-30.
  10. Cooper RM. Use of a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in the management of a difficult airway. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2003; 50: 611-13.
  11. Lim Y, Lim TJ, Liu EH. Ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by inexperienced operators in simulated difficult airways. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2004; 51: 641-2.
  12. Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 32-7.
  13. Sun DA, Warriner CB, Parsons DG, Klein R, Umedaly HS, Moult M. The GlideScope video laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005; 94: 381-4.
  14. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (Glide- Scope) in 728 patients. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2005; 52: 191-8.
  15. Turkstra TP, Craen RA, Pelz DM, Gelb AW. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2005; 101: 910-15, table of contents.
  16. Lee RA, van Zundert AA, Maassen RL, et al. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors during video-assisted intubation. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2009; 108: 187-91.
  17. Tescher AN, Rindflesch AB, Youdas JW, et al. Range- of-motion restriction and craniofacial tissue-interface pressure from four cervical collars. Journal of Trauma 2007; 63: 1120-6.
  18. Yentis SM, Lee DJ. Evaluation of an improved scoring system for the grading of direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 1041-4.
  19. Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, et al. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 1290-7.
  20. Agro F, Barzoi G, Montecchia F. Tracheal intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope or a GlideScope in 15 patients with cervical spine immobilization. British Journal of Anaes- thesia 2003; 90: 705-6.
  21. Komatsu R, Kamata K, Hoshi I, Sessler DI, Ozaki M. Airway scope and gum elastic bougie with Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with simu- lated restricted neck mobility. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2008; 101: 863-9.
  22. Komatsu R, Kamata K, Hamada K, Sessler DI, Ozaki M. Airway scope and StyletScope for tracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2009; 108: 273-9.
  23. Komatsu R, Nagata O, Sessler DI, Ozaki M. The intubating laryngeal mask airway facilitates tracheal intubation in the lateral position. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2004; 98: 858-61.
  24. Wakeling HG, Nightingale J. The intubating laryngeal mask airway does not facilitate tracheal intubation in the presence of a neck collar in simulated trauma. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000; 84: 254-6.
  25. Ferson DZ, Rosenblatt WH, Johansen MJ, Osborn I, Ovassapian A. Use of the intubating LMA-Fastrach in 254 patients with difficult-to-manage airways. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 1175-81.
  26. Moller F, Andres AH, Langenstein H. Intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) seems to be an ideal device for blind intubation in case of immobile spine. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000; 85: 493-5.
  27. Dimitriou V, Voyagis GS. Blind intubation via the ILMA: what about accidental oesophageal intubation? British Journal of Anaesthesia 1999; 82: 478-9.
  28. Crosby ET. Airway management in adults after cervical spine trauma. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 1293-318.
  29. MacQuarrie K, Hung OR, Law JA. Tracheal intubation using Bullard laryngoscope for patients with a simulated difficult airway. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 1999; 46: 760-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bathory, I., Frascarolo, P., Kern, C., & Schoettker, P.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Bathory, I.
Venue
Anaesthesia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-06
Volume
64
Issue
12
Pages
1337-1341
ISSN
  • 0003-2409 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2044
OpenAlex
W2088993051
Cited by
64
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Université de Lausanne
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Keywords
GlideScope, video laryngoscopy, endotracheal intubation, cervical spine immobilization, Cormack-Lehane grade, difficult airway, intubation time
MeSH terms
Adult, Cervical Vertebrae, Female, Humans, Immobilization, Intubation, Intratracheal, Male, Middle Aged, Orthotic Devices, Posture, Time Factors, Laryngoscopes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review