Cited by 44melanin and skin pigmentationGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

White spotting in the domestic cat (Felis catus) maps near KIT on feline chromosome B1

Open access
Cooper, M. P., Fretwell, N., Bailey, S. J., Lyons, L. A.·2006·Animal Genetics

Abstract

Five feline-derived microsatellite markers were genotyped in a large pedigree of cats that segregates for ventral white spotting. Both KIT and EDNRB cause similar white spotting phenotypes in other species. Thus, three of the five microsatellite markers chosen were on feline chromosome B1 in close proximity to KIT; the other two markers were on feline chromosome A1 near EDNRB. Pairwise linkage analysis supported linkage of the white spotting with the three chromosome B1 markers but not with the two chromosome A1 markers. This study indicates that KIT, or another gene within the linked region, is a candidate for white spotting in cats. Platelet-derived growth factor alpha (PDGFRA) is also a strong candidate, assuming that the KIT-PDGFRA linkage group, which is conserved in many mammalian species, is also conserved in the cat.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2005.01389.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, M. P., Fretwell, N., Bailey, S. J., & Lyons, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition (GB)
Corresponding author
Lyons, L. A.
Venue
Animal Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11-23
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
163-165
ISSN
  • 0268-9146 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2052
OpenAlex
W2057585604
Cited by
44
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animal Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Winn Feline Foundation
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of California, Davis
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Center for Research Resources (R24RR016094, RR016094)
  • Center for Companion Animal Health, University of California, Davis
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
white spotting, cats, KIT gene, endothelin B receptor, microsatellite markers, linkage analysis, pedigree, PDGFRA, candidate genes, coat color inheritance
MeSH terms
Animals, Cats, Chromosome Mapping, Genetic Markers, Hair Color, Lod Score, Phenotype, Skin Pigmentation, Microsatellite Repeats, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit, Chromosomes, Mammalian

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review